Giacino J T
JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, Edison, New Jersey, USA.
Semin Neurol. 1997 Jun;17(2):105-11. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1040919.
Disorders of consciousness present intriguing challenges to the neurologist and neurorehabilitation specialist. Assessment is constrained by the lack of reliable methods of assessing consciousness, and there are no treatment interventions known to influence the course of recovery from these conditions. In addition, the relationship between the clinical features associated with these disorders and their corresponding pathophysiologic substrate is also unclear. Our understanding of disorders of consciousness has not kept pace with the advances in neurosurgical management that have decreased mortality following severe injury. There is still considerable confusion regarding differential diagnosis and prognostication concerning states of severely altered consciousness. The purpose of this article is to discuss the content and neural basis of consciousness and to review the terminology most often used to describe altered states of consciousness. The neurobehavioral criteria for differentiating among specific syndromes associated with severe alterations in consciousness are presented. Representative case studies are utilized to illustrate the characteristic clinical profiles of coma, vegetative state, persistent and permanent vegetative state, minimally conscious state, akinetic mutism, and locked-in syndrome. Areas of ambiguity and controversy are emphasized and future directions for research are suggested.
意识障碍给神经科医生和神经康复专家带来了有趣的挑战。评估受到缺乏可靠的意识评估方法的限制,并且目前尚无已知的治疗干预措施可影响这些疾病的恢复进程。此外,与这些疾病相关的临床特征与其相应的病理生理基础之间的关系也不清楚。我们对意识障碍的理解未能跟上神经外科治疗进展的步伐,这些进展降低了严重损伤后的死亡率。在严重意识改变状态的鉴别诊断和预后方面仍存在相当大的困惑。本文的目的是讨论意识的内容和神经基础,并回顾最常用于描述意识改变状态的术语。介绍了区分与严重意识改变相关的特定综合征的神经行为标准。利用代表性病例研究来说明昏迷、植物状态、持续性和永久性植物状态、最低意识状态、运动不能性缄默症和闭锁综合征的特征性临床概况。强调了模糊和有争议的领域,并提出了未来的研究方向。