• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

步行、锻炼与吸烟:邻里环境有影响吗?

Walking, exercising, and smoking: does neighborhood matter?

作者信息

Ross C E

机构信息

Ohio State University, Department of Sociology, Columbus 43210, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(2):265-74. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00451-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00451-7
PMID:10832573
Abstract

Neighborhood context could affect health behaviors because of structure or contagion. We expected that residents of US neighborhoods where a high percentage of residents are poor and do not have college degrees would be more likely to smoke and less likely to walk and exercise. We examined the hypotheses using multi-level data in which survey information from a representative sample of Illinois residents is linked to census-tract information about poverty and education in their neighborhood. Contrary to expectations we found that residents of poor neighborhoods were more likely to walk than those in less disadvantaged places, adjusting for individual poverty, household income, education, race, ethnicity, sex, age, and marital status. This was the case despite the fact that residents of poor neighborhoods were more afraid to leave the house and feared being victimized on the streets. Consistent with expectations we found that residents of neighborhoods where a high percentage of residents are college educated are more likely to walk. Thus, the two aspects of neighborhood socioeconomic status had opposite effects on walking. Neighborhood context had no effect on the likelihood of exercising strenuously. Men in poor neighborhoods were more likely to smoke than those in less disadvantaged places, but neighborhood context had no significant effect on women's likelihood of smoking.

摘要

邻里环境可能由于结构或传染效应而影响健康行为。我们预计,在美国那些贫困居民比例高且没有大学学历的社区中,居民吸烟的可能性更大,而步行和锻炼的可能性更小。我们使用多层次数据检验了这些假设,其中来自伊利诺伊州居民代表性样本的调查信息与他们所在社区关于贫困和教育的普查区信息相关联。与预期相反,我们发现,在调整了个人贫困状况、家庭收入、教育程度、种族、民族、性别、年龄和婚姻状况后,贫困社区的居民比处境不那么不利的地方的居民更有可能步行。尽管贫困社区的居民更害怕出门,担心在街上受到侵害,但情况依然如此。与预期一致,我们发现居民中大学学历比例高的社区的居民更有可能步行。因此,邻里社会经济地位的两个方面对步行有相反的影响。邻里环境对剧烈运动的可能性没有影响。贫困社区的男性比处境不那么不利的地方的男性更有可能吸烟,但邻里环境对女性吸烟的可能性没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Walking, exercising, and smoking: does neighborhood matter?步行、锻炼与吸烟:邻里环境有影响吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(2):265-74. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00451-7.
2
Individual, neighborhood, and state-level predictors of smoking among US Black women: a multilevel analysis.美国黑人女性吸烟的个体、社区及州层面预测因素:一项多层次分析
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(4):1034-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 2.
3
Personal and neighborhood socioeconomic status and indices of neighborhood walk-ability predict body mass index in New York City.个人及邻里社会经济地位与邻里步行适宜性指数可预测纽约市的体重指数。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):1951-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.036. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
4
Neighborhood disadvantage and physical activity: baseline results from the HABITAT multilevel longitudinal study.社区劣势与身体活动:多水平纵向研究 HABITAT 的基线结果。
Ann Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;20(3):171-81. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.11.004.
5
Do health trajectories predict neighborhood outcomes? Evidence of health selection in a diverse sample of U.S. adults.健康轨迹是否能预测社区结果?美国成年人多样化样本中的健康选择证据。
Health Place. 2022 Jan;73:102713. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102713. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
6
Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health.邻里劣势、混乱与健康。
J Health Soc Behav. 2001 Sep;42(3):258-76.
7
The independent contribution of neighborhood disadvantage and individual-level socioeconomic position to self-reported oral health: a multilevel analysis.社区劣势和个体层面社会经济地位对自我报告的口腔健康的独立贡献:一项多层次分析。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):195-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00311.x.
8
Associations of neighborhood problems and neighborhood social cohesion with mental health and health behaviors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.社区问题和社区社会凝聚力与心理健康及健康行为的关联:动脉粥样硬化多民族研究
Health Place. 2008 Dec;14(4):853-65. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Jan 26.
9
Redlining and Neighborhood Walking in Older Adults: The 2017 National Household Travel Survey.老年人的红线和邻里步行:2017 年全国住户出行调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Dec;63(6):926-934. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
10
Walking to Work: The Roles of Neighborhood Walkability and Socioeconomic Deprivation.步行上班:邻里适步性与社会经济剥夺的作用
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Jun 16;12 Suppl 1:S70-5. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0359.

引用本文的文献

1
Landscape exposure and exercising for health: exposure to natural versus urban landscapes promotes walking for health.景观暴露与健康锻炼:接触自然景观与城市景观对促进健康步行的影响
Aust J Psychol. 2025 Jan 19;77(1):2450351. doi: 10.1080/00049530.2025.2450351. eCollection 2025.
2
Cumulative neighborhood disadvantage and racial and geographic disparities in epigenetic aging.累积邻里劣势与表观遗传衰老中的种族和地理差异。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Jun 10;31:101825. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101825. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Socioeconomic inequalities in employees' health-enhancing physical activity: Evidence from the SHAHWAR cohort study in Iran.
伊朗 SHAHWAR 队列研究中的员工促进健康的身体活动的社会经济不平等。
PLoS One. 2023 May 15;18(5):e0285620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285620. eCollection 2023.
4
Disparities in Perceived Physical and Mental Wellness: Relationships Between Social Vulnerability, Cardiovascular Risk Factor Prevalence, and Health Behaviors Among Elderly US Residents.感知身心健康的差异:美国老年居民的社会脆弱性、心血管风险因素患病率与健康行为之间的关系。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;14:21501319231163639. doi: 10.1177/21501319231163639.
5
Health Impacts of the Built and Social Environments, and Travel Behavior: The Case of the Sunshine State.建成环境和社会环境对健康的影响,以及出行行为:以阳光之州为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9102. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159102.
6
Physical activity and sitting time changes in response to the COVID-19 lockdown in England.英格兰因 COVID-19 封锁而改变的身体活动和久坐时间。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0271482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271482. eCollection 2022.
7
Local Inequalities in Health Behaviours: Longitudinal Findings from the Stockton-On-Tees Cohort Study.健康行为的地方不平等:来自斯托克顿-泰恩队列研究的纵向发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;18(21):11018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111018.
8
Investigating the practical viability of walk-sharing in improving pedestrian safety.研究步行共享在提高行人安全方面的实际可行性。
Comput Urban Sci. 2021;1(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s43762-021-00020-z. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Neighborhood Exposures and Blood Pressure Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Environmental Study among 19-53 Years-Old Parsis in Mumbai.社区环境暴露与血压结局:孟买 19-53 岁帕西人群的横断面环境研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 14;18(16):8594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168594.
10
It Takes Two to Tango: Patients' and Providers' Perspectives in Tobacco Cessation and Head/Neck Cancer.探戈需两人共舞:患者与医疗服务提供者在戒烟及头颈癌方面的观点
Oncologist. 2021 Sep;26(9):761-770. doi: 10.1002/onco.13856. Epub 2021 Jun 18.