• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独立代理人在医疗保险市场改革成功中的作用。

The role of independent agents in the success of health insurance market reforms.

作者信息

Hall M A

机构信息

Wake Forest University, School of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063, USA.

出版信息

Milbank Q. 2000;78(1):23-45, i-ii. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00160.

DOI:10.1111/1468-0009.00160
PMID:10834080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2751152/
Abstract

The impact of reforms on the health insurance markets cannot be understood without more information about the role played by insurance agents and a closer analysis of their contribution. An in-depth, qualitative study of insurance-market reforms in seven illustrative states forms the basis for this report on how agents help to shape the efficiency and fairness of insurance markets. Different types of agents relate to insurers in their own ways and are compensated differently. This study shows agents to be almost uniformly enthusiastic about guaranteed-issue requirements and other components of market reforms. Although insurers devise strategies for manipulating agents in order to avoid undesirable business, these opportunities are limited and do not appear to be seriously undermining the effectiveness of market reforms. Despite the layer of cost that agents add to the system, they play an important role in making market reforms work, and they fill essential information and service functions for which many purchasers have no ready substitute.

摘要

如果没有更多关于保险代理人所起作用的信息以及对其贡献的更深入分析,就无法理解改革对健康保险市场的影响。对七个具有代表性的州的保险市场改革进行的深入定性研究,构成了本报告关于代理人如何帮助塑造保险市场效率和公平性的基础。不同类型的代理人与保险公司的关系各不相同,薪酬方式也有所不同。本研究表明,代理人几乎一致对保证发行要求和市场改革的其他组成部分充满热情。尽管保险公司制定策略来操纵代理人以避免不良业务,但这些机会有限,似乎并未严重削弱市场改革的有效性。尽管代理人给系统增加了一层成本,但他们在使市场改革发挥作用方面发挥着重要作用,并且他们履行了许多购买者没有现成替代方案的基本信息和服务功能。

相似文献

1
The role of independent agents in the success of health insurance market reforms.独立代理人在医疗保险市场改革成功中的作用。
Milbank Q. 2000;78(1):23-45, i-ii. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00160.
2
The impact of health insurance market reforms on market competition.医疗保险市场改革对市场竞争的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2000 Jan;6(1):57-67.
3
Individual insurance: health insurers try to tap potential market growth.个人保险:健康保险公司试图挖掘潜在的市场增长机会。
Res Brief. 2009 Nov(14):1-8.
4
Costs, commitment and locality: a comparison of for-profit and not-for-profit health plans.成本、承诺与地区性:营利性与非营利性健康保险计划的比较
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):116-29. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.116.
5
The structure and enforcement of health insurance rating reforms.医疗保险费率改革的结构与实施
Inquiry. 2000;37(4):376-88.
6
First, do no harm: developing health insurance market reform packages.首先,切勿造成伤害:制定医疗保险市场改革方案。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1996 Fall;15(3):35-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.15.3.35.
7
Insurance agents: ignored players in health insurance reform.保险代理人:医疗保险改革中被忽视的参与者。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Mar-Apr;17(2):137-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.137.
8
A model to decompose the performance of supplementary private health insurance markets.一种用于分解补充私人健康保险市场绩效的模型。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2008 Sep;8(3):193-208. doi: 10.1007/s10754-008-9037-z. Epub 2008 Jun 22.
9
Medical Underwriting In Long-Term Care Insurance: Market Conditions Limit Options For Higher-Risk Consumers.长期护理保险中的医疗核保:市场状况限制了高风险消费者的选择。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1494-503. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1133.
10
An alternative approach to measuring the effects of insurance market reforms.一种衡量保险市场改革效果的替代方法。
Inquiry. 1999 Spring;36(1):44-56.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and ethnic disparities in the purchase of nongroup health insurance: the roles of community and family-level factors.非团体医疗保险购买中的种族和族裔差异:社区和家庭层面因素的作用。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):211-31. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00113.