• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于分解补充私人健康保险市场绩效的模型。

A model to decompose the performance of supplementary private health insurance markets.

作者信息

Leidl Reiner

机构信息

Ludwig-Maximilians-University and Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2008 Sep;8(3):193-208. doi: 10.1007/s10754-008-9037-z. Epub 2008 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1007/s10754-008-9037-z
PMID:18568435
Abstract

For an individual insurance firm offering supplementary private health insurance, a model is developed to decompose market performance in terms of insurer profits. For the individual contract, the model specifies the conditions under which adverse selection, cream skimming, and moral hazard occur, shows the impact of information on contracting, and the profit contribution. Contracts are determined by comparing willingness to pay for insurance with the individual's risk position, and information on both sides of the market. Finally, performance is aggregated up to the total market. The model provides a framework to explain the attractiveness of supplementary markets to insurers.

摘要

对于提供补充性私人医疗保险的个体保险公司,开发了一个模型,用于根据保险公司利润来分解市场表现。对于个人合同,该模型规定了逆向选择、撇脂和道德风险发生的条件,展示了信息对签约的影响以及利润贡献。合同通过比较保险支付意愿与个人风险状况以及市场双方的信息来确定。最后,将表现汇总到整个市场。该模型提供了一个框架来解释补充市场对保险公司的吸引力。

相似文献

1
A model to decompose the performance of supplementary private health insurance markets.一种用于分解补充私人健康保险市场绩效的模型。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2008 Sep;8(3):193-208. doi: 10.1007/s10754-008-9037-z. Epub 2008 Jun 22.
2
Risk selection and heterogeneous preferences in health insurance markets with a public option.具有公共选择的健康保险市场中的风险选择与异质性偏好。
J Health Econ. 2016 Sep;49:153-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
Costs, commitment and locality: a comparison of for-profit and not-for-profit health plans.成本、承诺与地区性:营利性与非营利性健康保险计划的比较
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):116-29. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.116.
4
Medical service provider networks.医疗机构网络。
Health Econ. 2018 Aug;27(8):1201-1217. doi: 10.1002/hec.3769. Epub 2018 May 17.
5
How can the regulator show evidence of (no) risk selection in health insurance markets? Conceptual framework and empirical evidence.监管机构如何证明健康保险市场中(不存在)风险选择的证据?概念框架与实证证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Mar;18(2):167-180. doi: 10.1007/s10198-016-0764-7. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
6
Is the medical loss ratio a good target measure for regulation in the individual market for health insurance?医疗损失率是否是医疗保险个人市场监管的一个良好目标衡量指标?
Health Econ. 2015 Jan;24(1):55-74. doi: 10.1002/hec.3002. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
7
Pricing behaviour of nonprofit insurers in a weakly competitive social health insurance market.非营利保险公司在弱竞争社会医疗保险市场中的定价行为。
J Health Econ. 2011 Mar;30(2):439-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
8
Asymmetric Information in Iranian's Health Insurance Market: Testing of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard.伊朗健康保险市场中的信息不对称:逆向选择与道德风险的检验
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Apr 19;7(6):146-55. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p146.
9
Optimal cost reimbursement of health insurers to reduce risk selection.优化医保机构的费用报销以减少风险选择。
Health Econ. 2011 May;20(5):532-52. doi: 10.1002/hec.1614.
10
Individual insurance: health insurers try to tap potential market growth.个人保险:健康保险公司试图挖掘潜在的市场增长机会。
Res Brief. 2009 Nov(14):1-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple Dimensions of Private Information: Evidence from the Long-Term Care Insurance Market.私人信息的多维性:来自长期护理保险市场的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2006 Sep 1;96(4):938-958. doi: 10.1257/aer.96.4.938.
2
Genetic testing in competitive insurance markets with repulsion from chance: a welfare analysis.存在偶然因素排斥情况下竞争保险市场中的基因检测:福利分析
J Health Econ. 2006 Sep;25(5):847-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 25.
3
Life insurance and breast cancer risk assessment: adverse selection, genetic testing decisions, and discrimination.
人寿保险与乳腺癌风险评估:逆向选择、基因检测决策与歧视
Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Jul 30;120A(3):359-64. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20025.
4
Asymmetric information in health insurance: evidence from the National Medical Expenditure Survey.健康保险中的信息不对称:来自国家医疗支出调查的证据。
Rand J Econ. 2001 Autumn;32(3):408-27.
5
What people really know about their health insurance: a comparison of information obtained from individuals and their insurers.人们对其医疗保险的真实了解:个体与保险公司所提供信息的比较。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):924-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.924.
6
Is cream-skimming a problem for the competitive medical market?撇脂策略对竞争激烈的医疗市场来说是个问题吗?
J Health Econ. 1984 Apr;3(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(84)90029-8.
7
Is competition the answer?竞争是答案吗?
J Health Econ. 1982 May;1(1):110-6. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(82)90023-6.
8
Consumer information surplus and adverse selection in competitive health insurance markets: an empirical study.竞争型健康保险市场中的消费者信息盈余与逆向选择:一项实证研究。
J Health Econ. 1995 Jun;14(2):149-69. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00043-4.
9
How can we prevent cream skimming in a competitive health insurance market? The great challenge for the 90's.在竞争激烈的医疗保险市场中,我们如何防止撇脂行为?这是90年代面临的巨大挑战。
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1992;1:23-46. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-2392-1_2.