Vanhaelewyn G, Callens F, Grün R
Laboratory for Crystallography and Study of the Solid State, University of Ghent, Belgium.
Appl Radiat Isot. 2000 May;52(5):1317-26. doi: 10.1016/s0969-8043(00)00090-7.
In order to determine the components which give rise to the EPR spectrum around g = 2 we have applied Maximum Likelihood Common Factor Analysis (MLCFA) on the EPR spectra of enamel sample 1126 which has previously been analysed by continuous wave and pulsed EPR as well as EPR microscopy. MLCFA yielded agreeing results on three sets of X-band spectra and the following components were identified: an orthorhombic component attributed to CO2-, an axial component (CO3(3-)), as well as four isotropic components, three of which could be attributed to SO2-, a tumbling CO2- and a central line of a dimethyl radical. The X-band results were confirmed by analysis of Q-band spectra where three additional isotropic lines were found, however, these three components could not be attributed to known radicals. The orthorhombic component was used to establish dose response curves for the assessment of the past radiation dose, D(E). The results appear to be more reliable than those based on conventional peak-to-peak EPR intensity measurements or simple Gaussian deconvolution methods.
为了确定在g = 2附近产生电子顺磁共振(EPR)谱的成分,我们对牙釉质样品1126的EPR谱应用了最大似然公共因子分析(MLCFA),该样品此前已通过连续波和脉冲EPR以及EPR显微镜进行了分析。MLCFA在三组X波段谱上得出了一致的结果,并鉴定出以下成分:一个归因于CO2-的正交成分、一个轴向成分(CO3(3-))以及四个各向同性成分,其中三个可归因于SO2-、一个翻滚的CO2-和一个二甲基自由基的中心线。通过对Q波段谱的分析证实了X波段的结果,在Q波段谱中发现了另外三条各向同性谱线,然而,这三个成分不能归因于已知的自由基。利用正交成分建立了剂量响应曲线,用于评估过去的辐射剂量D(E)。结果似乎比基于传统峰峰值EPR强度测量或简单高斯去卷积方法的结果更可靠。