• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最初采用监测管理的前列腺癌患者的治疗模式:来自CaPSURE数据库的结果。前列腺癌战略泌尿外科研究计划。

Patterns of treatment of patients with prostate cancer initially managed with surveillance: results from The CaPSURE database. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor.

作者信息

Koppie T M, Grossfeld G D, Miller D, Yu J, Stier D, Broering J M, Lubeck D, Henning J M, Flanders S C, Carroll P R

机构信息

Department of Urology, Center for Urologic Outcomes, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2000 Jul;164(1):81-8.

PMID:10840429
Abstract

PURPOSE

We determined the demographic and clinical profile of men who elect surveillance as the initial management of prostate cancer as well as the incidence and predictors of secondary treatment of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) is a national disease registry of patients with various stages and treatments of prostate cancer. Using this database of 4,458 men we identified 329 (8.2%) who elected surveillance as the initial management of prostate cancer. Patients choosing watchful waiting were compared to other CaPSURE participants using the chi-square test. The likelihood of treatment initiation in the watchful waiting group was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. After adjusting for patient age, race, prostate specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis, clinical T stage and total Gleason score the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine significant predictors of treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Compared with others in the database, patients on watchful waiting were more likely to be 75 years old or older (51% versus 16%, p <0.001), white (93% versus 85%, p <0.001), and have lower serum PSA (p <0.001), organ confined disease (97% versus 88%, p <0.001) and a total Gleason score of 7 or less (97% versus 88%, p <0.001). In the watchful waiting group there was a 52% likelihood of treatment initiation within 5 years of the diagnosis. Significant predictors of secondary treatment were age younger than 65 years and elevated serum PSA at diagnosis. Neither race, extraprostatic stage cT3 disease nor higher total Gleason score was a significant predictor of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Men who elect initial watchful waiting for prostate cancer tend to be older, have lower serum PSA and more favorable disease characteristics than those who seek treatment. PSA at diagnosis is the dominant factor for predicting secondary treatment.

摘要

目的

我们确定了选择监测作为前列腺癌初始治疗方法的男性患者的人口统计学和临床特征,以及这些患者二次治疗的发生率和预测因素。

材料与方法

前列腺癌战略泌尿学研究计划(CaPSURE)是一个关于前列腺癌不同分期和治疗方法的全国性疾病登记系统。利用这个包含4458名男性患者的数据库,我们确定了329名(8.2%)选择监测作为前列腺癌初始治疗方法的患者。采用卡方检验,将选择观察等待的患者与CaPSURE的其他参与者进行比较。使用Kaplan-Meier方法计算观察等待组开始治疗的可能性。在对患者年龄、种族、诊断时的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、临床T分期和总Gleason评分进行校正后,使用Cox比例风险回归模型确定开始治疗的显著预测因素。

结果

与数据库中的其他患者相比,选择观察等待的患者更可能年龄在75岁及以上(51%对16%,p<0.001)、为白人(93%对85%,p<0.001),且血清PSA较低(p<0.001)、疾病局限于器官内(97%对88%,p<0.001)以及总Gleason评分为7分或更低(97%对88%,p<0.001)。在观察等待组中,诊断后5年内开始治疗的可能性为52%。二次治疗的显著预测因素为年龄小于65岁以及诊断时血清PSA升高。种族、前列腺外分期cT3疾病和更高的总Gleason评分均不是治疗的显著预测因素。

结论

与寻求治疗的男性相比,选择对前列腺癌进行初始观察等待的男性往往年龄更大、血清PSA更低且疾病特征更有利。诊断时的PSA是预测二次治疗的主要因素。

相似文献

1
Patterns of treatment of patients with prostate cancer initially managed with surveillance: results from The CaPSURE database. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor.最初采用监测管理的前列腺癌患者的治疗模式:来自CaPSURE数据库的结果。前列腺癌战略泌尿外科研究计划。
J Urol. 2000 Jul;164(1):81-8.
2
Watchful waiting and factors predictive of secondary treatment of localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌的观察等待及二次治疗的预测因素
J Urol. 2004 Mar;171(3):1111-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000113300.74132.8b.
3
Predictors of treatment after initial surveillance in men with prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.前列腺癌男性患者初次监测后的治疗预测因素:CaPSURE研究结果
J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 1):2279-83. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000094190.46523.b2.
4
Time trends and characteristics of men choosing watchful waiting for initial treatment of localized prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.选择观察等待作为局限性前列腺癌初始治疗方法的男性患者的时间趋势及特征:来自CaPSURE的结果
J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1804-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091641.34674.11.
5
Adjuvant radiotherapy in prostate cancer: predictors of prostate-specific antigen recurrence from the CaPSURE database.前列腺癌的辅助放疗:来自CaPSURE数据库的前列腺特异性抗原复发预测因素
Urology. 2007 Jul;70(1):106-10. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.018.
6
Temporarily deferred therapy (watchful waiting) for men younger than 70 years and with low-risk localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era.在前列腺特异性抗原时代,对70岁以下且患有低风险局限性前列腺癌的男性进行暂时延迟治疗(观察等待)。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 1;21(21):4001-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.092.
7
Androgen-deprivation therapy as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: data from Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE).雄激素剥夺疗法作为局限性前列腺癌的主要治疗方法:来自前列腺癌战略泌尿学研究计划(CaPSURE)的数据。
Cancer. 2006 Apr 15;106(8):1708-14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21799.
8
Predicting risk of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy with the Center for Prostate Disease Research and Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor databases.利用前列腺疾病研究中心和前列腺癌战略泌尿学研究计划数据库预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原复发风险。
J Urol. 2001 Oct;166(4):1322-7.
9
Conservative management of prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era: the incidence and time course of subsequent therapy.前列腺特异性抗原时代前列腺癌的保守治疗:后续治疗的发生率及时间进程
J Urol. 2001 Nov;166(5):1702-6.
10
Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE).前列腺癌临床风险分层的时间趋势:对结局的影响(来自CaPSURE的数据)
J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 2):S21-5; discussion S26-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000095025.03331.c6.

引用本文的文献

1
Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of prostate cancer patients on delayed palliative management: a PIONEER analysis based on big data.延迟姑息治疗的前列腺癌患者的基线特征和临床结局:基于大数据的先锋分析
Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(3):403-410. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2024.83. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
2
A vision for closing the evidence-practice gap in the management of low-grade prostate cancer.缩小低级别前列腺癌管理中证据与实践差距的愿景。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Mar 1;7(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad028.
3
Watchful waiting and quality of life among prostate cancer survivors in the Physicians' Health Study.
观察等待和生活质量在前列腺癌幸存者中的医生健康研究。
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1862-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.058. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
4
When 'dueling technologies' are mistaken for progress.当“对抗性技术”被误认为是进步时。
BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1699-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10243.x.
5
Prospective study of determinants and outcomes of deferred treatment or watchful waiting among men with prostate cancer in a nationwide cohort.一项针对全国范围内前列腺癌男性患者延迟治疗或观察等待的决定因素及结果的前瞻性研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 20;27(30):4980-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.2613. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
6
Incompetent patients, substitute decision making, and quality of life: some ethical considerations.无行为能力患者、替代决策与生活质量:一些伦理考量
Medscape J Med. 2008;10(10):237. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
7
Managing the low-socioeconomic-status prostate cancer patient.管理低社会经济地位的前列腺癌患者。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Apr;98(4):521-30.
8
Global registries for measuring pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes: focus on design and data collection, analysis and interpretation.用于衡量药物经济学和生活质量结果的全球注册登记处:重点关注设计、数据收集、分析与解读。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(9):551-68. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422090-00001.
9
Patterns of practice in the United States: insights from CaPSURE on prostate cancer management.美国的实践模式:来自CaPSURE关于前列腺癌管理的见解。
Curr Urol Rep. 2004 Jun;5(3):166-72. doi: 10.1007/s11934-004-0033-7.
10
Prostate cancer management: (1) an update on localised disease.前列腺癌管理:(1)局限性疾病的最新情况。
Postgrad Med J. 2003 Oct;79(936):575-80. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.936.575.