Nelson D E, Thompson B L, Davenport N J, Penaloza L J
Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. 30341-3717, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):924-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.924.
This study determined the validity of self-reported data on selected health insurance characteristics.
We obtained telephone survey data on the presence of health insurance, source of insurance, length of time insured, and type of insurance (managed care or fee-for-service) from a random sample of 351 adults in 3 Wisconsin counties and compared findings with data from respondents' health insurers.
More than 97% of the respondents correctly reported that they were currently insured. For source of insurance among persons aged 18 to 64 years, sensitivity was high for those covered through private health insurance (93.8%) but low for those covered through public insurance (6.7%). Only 33.1% of the respondents accurately categorized length of enrollment in their current plan. Overall estimates for managed care enrollment were similar for the 2 sources, but individual validity was low: 84.2% of those in fee-for-service believed that they were in managed care.
Information obtained from the general population about whether they have health insurance is valid, but self-reported data on source of insurance, length of time insured, and type of insurance are suspect and should be used cautiously.
本研究确定了关于选定医疗保险特征的自我报告数据的有效性。
我们从威斯康星州3个县的351名成年人的随机样本中获取了关于医疗保险的存在、保险来源、参保时长以及保险类型(管理式医疗或按服务收费)的电话调查数据,并将结果与受访者的健康保险公司的数据进行了比较。
超过97%的受访者正确报告他们目前有保险。对于18至64岁人群的保险来源,通过私人医疗保险参保者的敏感性较高(93.8%),而通过公共保险参保者的敏感性较低(6.7%)。只有33.1%的受访者准确分类了他们当前计划的参保时长。两种来源的管理式医疗参保总体估计相似,但个体有效性较低:84.2%的按服务收费参保者认为他们参加的是管理式医疗。
从普通人群中获得的关于他们是否有医疗保险的信息是有效的,但关于保险来源、参保时长和保险类型的自我报告数据值得怀疑,应谨慎使用。