• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《平价医疗法案》实施后基层医疗的障碍:对洛杉矶安全网患者经历的定性研究

Barriers to Primary Care After the Affordable Care Act: A Qualitative Study of Los Angeles Safety-Net Patients' Experiences.

作者信息

Saluja Sonali, McCormick Danny, Cousineau Michael R, Morrison Janina, Shue Lisa, Joyner Kyle, Hochman Michael

机构信息

The Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Cambridge Health Alliance, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Health Equity. 2019 Aug 23;3(1):423-430. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0056. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1089/heq.2019.0056
PMID:31448352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6707030/
Abstract

Millions of people gained health care coverage in Los Angeles after the Affordable Care Act (ACA); however, challenges with obtaining and utilizing primary care still persist, particularly in the safety net. In this study, we explore barriers to accessing primary care services among safety-net patients in Los Angeles after Medicaid expansion and implementation of other programs for safety-net patients after the ACA. We conducted qualitative interviews, in Spanish and English, with 34 nonelderly adult patients in 1 of 3 insurance groups: Medicaid, MyHealthLA (a health care program for low-income undocumented individuals), or uninsured. We recruited participants from three sites in Los Angeles in 2017. We analyzed our interviews using a framework approach and included emerging concepts from participant responses. We identified seven themes regarding barriers to accessing primary care: understanding the concept of primary care, finding a primary care provider (PCP), switching PCPs, getting timely appointments, geography and transportation, perceived cost or coverage barriers, and preferring emergency or urgent care over primary care. Patients with Medicaid were more likely to report barriers compared with other groups. Uninsured patients were less likely to understand the concept of primary care. Patients with MyHealthLA noted getting timely appointments and cost of care to be significant barriers. Despite Medicaid and other coverage expansions for safety-net patients after the ACA, substantial barriers to accessing primary care persist. Addressing such barriers through the development of targeted interventions or broader policy solutions could improve access to primary care for safety-net patients in Los Angeles.

摘要

《平价医疗法案》(ACA)实施后,数百万洛杉矶居民获得了医保覆盖;然而,在获取和利用初级医疗服务方面仍存在挑战,在安全网体系中尤为如此。在本研究中,我们探讨了医疗补助扩大以及ACA实施后针对安全网患者的其他项目实施后,洛杉矶安全网患者获取初级医疗服务的障碍。我们用西班牙语和英语对34名非老年成年患者进行了定性访谈,这些患者分属三个保险组之一:医疗补助、“我的健康洛杉矶”(一项针对低收入无证人员的医疗保健项目)或未参保。2017年,我们从洛杉矶的三个地点招募了参与者。我们采用框架分析法对访谈进行分析,并纳入了参与者回答中出现的新观点。我们确定了获取初级医疗服务障碍的七个主题:理解初级医疗的概念、找到初级医疗服务提供者(PCP)、更换PCP、获得及时预约、地理位置和交通、感知到的成本或覆盖障碍,以及比起初级医疗更喜欢急诊或紧急护理。与其他组相比,参加医疗补助的患者更有可能报告存在障碍。未参保患者不太可能理解初级医疗的概念。参加“我的健康洛杉矶”项目的患者指出,获得及时预约和护理费用是重大障碍。尽管ACA实施后为安全网患者扩大了医疗补助及其他覆盖范围,但获取初级医疗服务的重大障碍依然存在。通过制定有针对性的干预措施或更广泛的政策解决方案来解决这些障碍,可能会改善洛杉矶安全网患者获得初级医疗服务的情况。

相似文献

1
Barriers to Primary Care After the Affordable Care Act: A Qualitative Study of Los Angeles Safety-Net Patients' Experiences.《平价医疗法案》实施后基层医疗的障碍:对洛杉矶安全网患者经历的定性研究
Health Equity. 2019 Aug 23;3(1):423-430. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0056. eCollection 2019.
2
Why Uninsured Free Clinic Patients Don't Apply for Affordable Care Act Health Insurance in a Non-expanding Medicaid State.为何在非医疗补助扩大州,未参保的免费诊所患者不申请《平价医疗法案》医保。
J Community Health. 2016 Feb;41(1):119-26. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0076-3.
3
Perspectives of adults with disabilities on access to health care after the ACA: Qualitative findings.《平价医疗法案》后残疾成年人获得医疗保健的看法:定性研究结果。
Disabil Health J. 2019 Jul;12(3):350-358. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
Perspectives from leadership and frontline staff on telehealth transitions in the Los Angeles safety net during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.领导者和一线工作人员对新冠疫情期间及之后洛杉矶安全网中远程医疗转型的看法。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 9;4:944860. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.944860. eCollection 2022.
5
Has the Affordable Care Act Been Associated with Increased Insurance Coverage and Early-stage Diagnoses of Bone and Soft-tissue Sarcomas in Adults?平价医疗法案是否与成年人的保险覆盖范围增加和骨与软组织肉瘤的早期诊断有关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Mar 1;479(3):493-502. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001438.
6
Improving Health Care for the Future Uninsured in Los Angeles County: A Community-Partnered Dialogue.改善洛杉矶县未来无保险人群的医疗保健:一场社区合作对话。
Ethn Dis. 2015 Nov 5;25(4):487-94. doi: 10.18865/ed.25.4.487.
7
The Affordable Care Act Decreased the Proportion of Uninsured Patients in a Safety Net Orthopaedic Clinic.平价医疗法案降低了一家骨科医保诊所中无保险患者的比例。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 May;476(5):925-931. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000078.
8
"Canaries in the mine..." the impact of Affordable Care Act implementation on people with disabilities: Evidence from interviews with disability advocates.“煤矿中的金丝雀……”平价医疗法案实施对残疾人的影响:来自残疾倡导者访谈的证据。
Disabil Health J. 2018 Jan;11(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
Changes in uncompensated pediatric ambulatory care visits for uninsured children among safety net providers after implementing a health insurance program for children of low-income families.为低收入家庭儿童实施医疗保险计划后,安全网提供者处未参保儿童的非补偿性儿科门诊就诊情况的变化。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):E1-6. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31819aaabd.
10
Su salud a la mano (your health at hand): patient perceptions about a bilingual patient portal in the Los Angeles safety net.手中的健康(Your health at hand):洛杉矶安全网中双语患者门户的患者认知。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Dec 1;26(12):1525-1535. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz115.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Patients With Cirrhosis at US Safety-Net Health Systems.美国安全网医疗系统中肝硬化患者的肝细胞癌监测
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 25;16(8):e00877. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000877. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
2
Disparities in Smoking Cessation Treatment Among Immigrants and Potential Barriers to Care.移民群体戒烟治疗的差异及潜在的护理障碍
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02443-4.
3
Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.自《平价医疗法案》以来影响美国女性获得初级保健服务的因素:一项混合方法的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0314620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314620. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparing imputation approaches for immigration status in ED visits: Implications for using electronic medical records.急诊就诊中移民身份的插补方法比较:对使用电子病历的启示
Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb;60(1):e14397. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14397. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
5
Health Care Use Among Patients Retroactively Insured via a Hospital-Based Insurance Linkage Program.通过基于医院的保险衔接计划进行追溯参保的患者的医疗保健利用情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Aug;39(11):1977-1984. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08712-y. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
6
Care for Vulnerable Populations with Chronic Liver Disease: A Safety-Net Perspective.从安全网角度看慢性肝病弱势群体的护理
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 13;11(20):2725. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202725.
7
Do Tobacco Treatment Trials Address Disparities in Smoking Outcomes Among Black and Hispanic Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review of Smoking Cessation Interventions for Black and Hispanic Patients Diagnosed with Cancer.烟草治疗试验是否解决了黑人和西班牙裔癌症患者吸烟结局方面的差异问题?对诊断为癌症的黑人和西班牙裔患者的戒烟干预措施的系统评价。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Aug;11(4):2390-2406. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01705-3. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
8
A nurse-led intervention in patients with newly diagnosed cancer and Type 2 diabetes: A pilot randomized controlled trial feasibility study.护士主导的干预对新诊断癌症和 2 型糖尿病患者的影响:一项初步的随机对照试验可行性研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(11):12874-12880. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6118. Epub 2023 May 22.
9
Healthcare beliefs, health information seeking, and healthcare setting preferences among women who inject drugs by community supervision status.按社区监管状态划分的注射毒品女性的医疗保健观念、健康信息寻求行为及医疗保健场所偏好
Health Justice. 2021 Apr 16;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00135-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Health Care Access and Self-Assessed Health After 3 Years.《平价医疗法案》实施三年后对医疗保健可及性和自我评估健康状况的影响。
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018796361. doi: 10.1177/0046958018796361.
2
Insurance Type and Access to Health Care Providers and Appointments Under the Affordable Care Act.平价医疗法案下的保险类型和医疗服务提供者及预约访问。
Med Care. 2018 Feb;56(2):186-192. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000855.
3
Cal MediConnect Enrollment: Why Are Dual-Eligible Consumers in Los Angeles County Opting Out?加州医保连接计划注册:洛杉矶县的双重资格消费者为何选择退出?
Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res. 2017 Sep 1;2017(7):1-8.
4
Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Care: Has the Affordable Care Act Made a Difference?减少医疗服务获取方面的种族和族裔差异:《平价医疗法案》有作用吗?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Aug;2017:1-14.
5
Reasons for Frequent Emergency Department Use by Medicaid Enrollees: A Qualitative Study.医疗补助计划参保者频繁使用急诊科的原因:一项定性研究
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;23(4):476-81. doi: 10.1111/acem.12952. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
6
Affordability of health care under publicly subsidized insurance after Massachusetts health care reform: a qualitative study of safety net patients.马萨诸塞州医疗改革后公共补贴保险下医疗保健的可负担性:对安全网患者的定性研究
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Oct 29;14:112. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0240-5.
7
The Affordable Care Act at 5 Years.《平价医疗法案》实施五周年
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 18;372(25):2451-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1503614. Epub 2015 May 6.
8
Acceptance of new patients with public and private insurance by office-based physicians: United States, 2013.2013年美国门诊医生对有公共和私人保险的新患者的接纳情况
NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Mar(195):1-8.
9
Medicaid beneficiaries in california reported less positive experiences when assigned to a managed care plan.加利福尼亚州的医疗补助计划受益人在被分配到管理式医疗计划时,报告的积极体验较少。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Mar;34(3):447-54. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0528.
10
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.