Ashworth M, Armstrong D, Colwill S, Cohen A, Balazs J
GKT Department of General Practice, Kings College London, 5 Lambeth Walk, London SE11 6SP, U.K.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2000 Apr;25(2):119-24. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2000.00270.x.
To determine the extent to which GPs were motivated to change their prescribing upon joining a Primary Care Commissioning Group (PCCG) and how effective certain interventions planned by the PCCG might be as a means to change prescribing. To define the characteristics of GPs less motivated to change their prescribing.
A cross-sectional survey of participating general practitioners linked with current prescribing information derived from PACT data.
General practice covering a geographical locality within inner-city south London.
All 72 general practitioners who had joined a GP Commissioning Group.
questionnaire responses.
93% of GPs entering the GP Commissioning Group expected their prescribing to change but none expected substantial change. There was no difference between fundholders, singlehanders nor training practices in their expectation of change. GPs in practices with the lowest quality prescribing, as measured by a quality index, were least likely to expect change (Spearman's r = 0.25, P = 0.04). Those in practices with higher prescribing costs were not more likely to expect their prescribing to change, whereas expensive prescribers who were unaware of their practices' prescribing costs were associated with a reduced expectation of prescribing change (P = 0.05). Educational interventions were thought to be the most effective means by which prescribing could be changed, whereas formularies and financial factors were perceived as weaker influences.
Acceptance of a cash-limited prescribing budget by GPs is accompanied by the expectation of personal prescribing change. The motivation to change prescribing may be related to a strongly developed collectivist perspective amongst GPs who are prepared to consider the prescribing implications for their fellow GPs. It is ironic that those with the least expectation of change should have the lowest quality prescribing, or be unaware of their high cost prescribing. Engendering greater commitment to the professional group may be one way of changing their prescribing.
确定全科医生(GPs)加入基层医疗委托小组(PCCG)后在改变其处方行为方面的积极性程度,以及PCCG计划的某些干预措施作为改变处方的手段可能有多有效。明确改变处方积极性较低的全科医生的特征。
对参与的全科医生进行横断面调查,并与从PACT数据得出的当前处方信息相关联。
涵盖伦敦南部市中心一个地理区域的全科医疗。
所有72名已加入全科医生委托小组的全科医生。
问卷调查回复。
加入全科医生委托小组的全科医生中有93%预计他们的处方会改变,但没有人预计会有实质性改变。在对改变的预期方面,基金持有者、个体执业者和培训诊所之间没有差异。根据质量指数衡量,处方质量最低的诊所中的全科医生最不可能预期会有改变(斯皮尔曼相关系数r = 0.25,P = 0.04)。处方成本较高的诊所中的全科医生并不更有可能预期他们的处方会改变,而那些不知道自己诊所处方成本的高成本处方者对处方改变的预期降低(P = 0.05)。教育干预被认为是改变处方最有效的手段,而处方集和财务因素被认为影响较弱。
全科医生接受现金受限的处方预算时伴随着对个人处方改变的预期。改变处方的积极性可能与全科医生中强烈发展的集体主义观念有关,他们准备考虑对同行全科医生的处方影响。具有讽刺意味的是,那些对改变期望最低的人处方质量最低,或者不知道自己的高成本处方。增强对专业群体的更大承诺可能是改变他们处方的一种方式。