Bain V G, Abraham N, Jhangri G S, Alexander T W, Henning R C, Hoskinson M E, Maguire C G, Lalor E A, Sadowski D C
Department of Medicine, Walter Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Can J Gastroenterol. 2000 May;14(5):397-402. doi: 10.1155/2000/467567.
There have been few prospective studies regarding the investigation of biliary strictures, principally because of rapid technological change. The present study was designed to determine the sensitivity of various imaging studies for the detection of biliary strictures. Serum biochemistry and imaging studies were evaluated for their role in distinguishing benign from malignant strictures.
Thirty-one patients with suspected noncalculus biliary obstruction were enrolled consecutively in the study. A complete biochemical profile, ultrasound, Disida scan and cholangiogram (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP] or percutaneous cholangiogram) were obtained at study entry. Stricture etiology was determined based on cytology, biopsy and/or clinical follow-up at one year.
Twenty-nine of 31 patients had biliary strictures, of which 15 were malignant. The mean age of the malignant cohort was 73.9 years versus 53.9 years in the benign cohort (P<0.001). Statistically significant differences between the malignant and benign groups, respectively, were as follows: alanine transaminase 235.2 versus 66.9 U/L (P=0.004), aspartate transaminase 189.8 versus 84.5 U/L (P=0.011), alkaline phosphatase 840.2 versus 361.1 U/L (P=0.002), bilirubin 317.8 versus 22.1 micromol/L (P<0. 001) and bile acids 242.5 versus 73.2 micromol/L (P=0.001). Threshold analysis using receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that a bilirubin level of 75 micromol/L was most predictive of malignant strictures. Intrahepatic duct dilation was present in 93% of malignant strictures versus 36% of benign strictures (P=0.002). Common hepatic duct dilation was less discriminatory (malignant 13.5 versus benign 9.6 mm; P=0.11). Ultrasound was highly sensitive (93%) in the detection of the primary tumour in the bile duct or pancreas, or in the visualization of nodal or liver metastases. In benign disease, ultrasound failed to detect evidence of intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary dilation in most cases. Disida scans were not able to distinguish between malignant or benign strictures and could not accurately localize the level of obstruction. The sensitivity of Disida scan for the diagnosis of obstruction was 50%. Cholangiographic characterization of strictures revealed an equal distribution of smooth (eight of 13) and irregular (five of 13) strictures in the malignant group. Ten of 13 benign strictures were characterized as smooth. Malignant strictures were significantly longer than benign ones - 30.3 versus 9.2 mm (P=0.001). Threshold analysis using ROC curves showed that strictures greater than or equal to 14 mm were predictive of malignancy (sensitivity 78%, specificity 75%, log odds ratio 11.23).
A serum bilirubin level of 75 micromol/L or higher, or a stricture length of greater than 14 mm was highly predictive of malignancy in patients with a biliary stricture. Ultrasound was useful in predicting malignant strictures by detecting either intrahepatic duct dilation or by visualizing the tumour (primary or metastases). Strictures with a 'benign' cholangiographic appearance are frequently malignant. Disida scan did not add additional information. ERCP is necessary to diagnose benign strictures, which tend to be less extensive at presentation.
关于胆管狭窄的研究,前瞻性研究较少,主要是因为技术变化迅速。本研究旨在确定各种影像学检查对胆管狭窄的检测敏感度。评估血清生化检查和影像学检查在鉴别良性与恶性狭窄中的作用。
连续纳入31例疑似非结石性胆管梗阻患者。研究开始时进行完整的生化检查、超声、二异丙基乙酰胺扫描和胆管造影(内镜逆行胰胆管造影[ERCP]或经皮胆管造影)。根据细胞学、活检和/或一年的临床随访确定狭窄病因。
31例患者中有29例存在胆管狭窄,其中15例为恶性。恶性组的平均年龄为73.9岁,良性组为53.9岁(P<0.001)。恶性组和良性组之间在以下方面存在统计学显著差异:丙氨酸转氨酶分别为235.2与66.9 U/L(P=0.004),天冬氨酸转氨酶为189.8与84.5 U/L(P=0.011),碱性磷酸酶为840.2与361.1 U/L(P=0.002),胆红素为317.8与22.1 μmol/L(P<0.001),胆汁酸为242.5与73.2 μmol/L(P=0.001)。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线进行阈值分析表明,胆红素水平75 μmol/L最能预测恶性狭窄。93%的恶性狭窄存在肝内胆管扩张,而良性狭窄中这一比例为36%(P=0.002)。肝总管扩张的鉴别性较差(恶性为13.5 vs良性为9.6 mm;P=0.11)。超声对胆管或胰腺原发性肿瘤的检测,或对淋巴结或肝转移灶的可视化高度敏感(93%)。在良性疾病中,超声在大多数情况下未能检测到肝内或肝外胆管扩张的证据。二异丙基乙酰胺扫描无法区分恶性或良性狭窄,也无法准确确定梗阻部位。二异丙基乙酰胺扫描对梗阻诊断的敏感度为50%。胆管造影对狭窄的特征显示,恶性组中光滑狭窄(13例中的8例)和不规则狭窄(13例中的5例)分布相等。13例良性狭窄中有10例表现为光滑。恶性狭窄明显长于良性狭窄,分别为30.3与9.2 mm(P=0.001)。使用ROC曲线进行阈值分析表明,长度大于或等于14 mm的狭窄可预测为恶性(敏感度78%,特异度75%,对数优势比11.23)。
血清胆红素水平75 μmol/L或更高,或狭窄长度大于14 mm高度提示胆管狭窄患者存在恶性病变。超声通过检测肝内胆管扩张或可视化肿瘤(原发性或转移灶)有助于预测恶性狭窄。胆管造影表现为“良性”的狭窄往往是恶性的。二异丙基乙酰胺扫描未提供额外信息。诊断良性狭窄需要ERCP,其在初诊时往往范围较小。