Park Mi-Suk, Kim Tae Kyoung, Kim Kyoung Won, Park Sung Won, Lee Jeong Kyung, Kim Jung-Sun, Lee Jean Hwa, Kim Kyoung Ah, Kim Ah Young, Kim Pyo Nyun, Lee Moon-Gyu, Ha Hyun Kwon
Depts of Diagnostic Radiology and Pathology, Asan Medical Ctr, Univ of Ulsan College of Medicine, 388-1 Poongnap Dong Songpa-Ku, Seoul 138-040, South Korea.
Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):234-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2331031446. Epub 2004 Aug 27.
To retrospectively evaluate criteria for differentiating extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign cause of stricture at magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and to compare diagnostic accuracy with this modality versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
MRCP and ERCP images in 50 patients (27 with cholangiocarcinoma [18 men, nine women; mean age, 58 years] and 23 with benign cause of stricture [13 men, 10 women; mean age, 60 years]) were retrospectively reviewed to assess the appearance of bile duct strictures. Final diagnosis was based on surgical or biopsy findings. Strictures were described according to their imaging appearance (irregular or smooth margins, asymmetric or symmetric narrowing, abrupt narrowing or gradual tapering, and presence or absence of double-duct sign). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRCP and ERCP were calculated by using ratings of confidence in image-based diagnosis. Lengths of stricture were electronically measured and compared by using the Student t test.
Among cholangiographic criteria for malignant biliary stricture, irregular margins and asymmetric narrowing were more common in cholangiocarcinomas (24 [89%] of 27 patients) than in benign strictures (six [26%] and eight [35%] of 23 patients, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two methods for differentiation of malignant from benign causes of biliary stricture were 81% (22 of 27), 70% (16 of 23), and 76% (38 of 50), respectively, for MRCP and 74% (20 of 27), 70% (16 of 23), and 72% (36 of 50), respectively, for ERCP. Mean length (+/- standard deviation) of cholangiocarcinomas was 30.0 mm +/- 8.5, and that of benign strictures was 13.6 mm +/- 9.1 (P <.001).
Accuracy of MRCP is comparable with that of ERCP. Regardless of modality, a lengthy segment of extrahepatic bile duct stricture with irregular margin and asymmetric narrowing suggests cholangiocarcinoma, and a short segment with regular margin and symmetric narrowing suggests benign cause.
回顾性评估磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)中肝外胆管胆管癌与良性狭窄病因的鉴别标准,并比较该检查方法与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的诊断准确性。
回顾性分析50例患者的MRCP和ERCP图像(27例胆管癌患者[18例男性,9例女性;平均年龄58岁],23例良性狭窄病因患者[13例男性,10例女性;平均年龄60岁]),以评估胆管狭窄的表现。最终诊断基于手术或活检结果。根据狭窄的影像表现(边缘不规则或光滑、不对称或对称狭窄、突然狭窄或逐渐变细以及是否存在双管征)对狭窄进行描述。通过对基于图像诊断的可信度评级计算MRCP和ERCP的敏感性、特异性和准确性。电子测量狭窄长度,并采用Student t检验进行比较。
在恶性胆管狭窄的胆管造影标准中,边缘不规则和不对称狭窄在胆管癌患者(27例患者中的24例[89%])中比在良性狭窄患者(23例患者中的6例[26%]和8例[35%])中更常见。MRCP区分胆管狭窄恶性与良性病因的两种方法的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为81%(27例中的22例)、70%(23例中的16例)和76%(50例中的38例),ERCP分别为74%(27例中的20例)、70%(23例中的16例)和72%(50例中的36例)。胆管癌的平均长度(±标准差)为30.0 mm±8.5,良性狭窄的平均长度为13.6 mm±9.1(P<.001)。
MRCP的准确性与ERCP相当。无论采用何种检查方法,肝外胆管狭窄段长、边缘不规则且不对称狭窄提示胆管癌,而短段、边缘规则且对称狭窄提示良性病因。