Treatment of the contralateral negative neck in supraglottic cancer patients with unilateral node metastases (N1-3).

BACKGROUND

Elective treatment of the contralateral N0 neck in supraglottic cancer patients with unilateral metastases is controversial.

METHODS

We reviewed 127 N1-3 cases with contralateral negative necks to compare elective contralateral dissection (ED: 24 cases) with a contralateral wait-and-see policy (WS: 103 cases) and subsequent delayed therapy (SDT: 40 cases) when contralateral disease became evident. Prognostic factors were studied to identify the risk of contralateral disease.

RESULTS

Nine of 24 (37.5%) ED patients had occult contralateral metastases, and 40 of 103 (38.8%) WS patients had a delayed contralateral failure. Supraglottic cancers involving or extending up to the midline had a higher risk of contralateral metastases compared with well-lateralized tumors (p =.049). The risk of contralateral neck disease was more influenced by tumor site and stage than by histopathologic characteristics of ipsilateral metastases. WS patients with contralateral neck relapse showed a higher risk of distant metastases and of level I and V neck involvement than ED cases with no difference in terms of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of contralateral occult neck involvement in supraglottic laryngeal cancers with unilateral metastases is high (about 40%), particularly for more advanced lesions extending to or involving the midline larynx; thus, a bilateral neck treatment in such cases is recommended.