Gallo O, Deganello A, Scala J, De Campora E
Department of Oto-Neuro-Ophthalmological Sciences of the University of Florence, ENT Clinic, Florence, Italy.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2006 Dec;26(6):335-44.
Management of cervical lymph node metastasis is one of the most challenging problems facing clinicians dealing with head and neck cancer. A retrospective evaluation has been made of results in N0 laryngeal cancer patients treated from 1978 to date by comparing historical data reported in related papers previously published by our institution. The medical records of 2207 consecutive patients with cN0 SCC of the larynx were used as the source of data in the present study. Together with primary treatment, 759 (34.4%) received at least unilateral elective neck dissection, while the remaining 1448 (65.6%) were admitted to a wait-and-see protocol. Overall, in the electively dissected patients (ED): 128 (16.9%) cases were submitted to classical radical neck dissection, while 403 (53.1%) cases were submitted to functional neck dissection (FND) and 228 (30.0%) cases to jugular node dissection (JND, removing Level II, III and IV). In 125 of the ED group, a neck procedure on the contralateral N0 neck was associated, of which 15 were RNDs, 35 FNDs and 75 JNDs, respectively. Based on this large series population, the change in the philosophy was evaluated concerning elective neck treatment in N0 laryngeal cancer, from RND through FND towards JND. As far as concerns the reliability as a staging procedure, no statistically significant difference was found between RND, FND and JND (p = 0.794). The 5-year neck recurrence rate, as estimated by the Kaplan Meier, method, for all ED patients, was 7.7%. No significant difference in the rate of 5-year neck recurrence was detected between RND, FND and JND groups (p = 0.178). In the survival curves, no differences, in terms of actuarial survival by Kaplan Meier analysis, were observed, in our series, as far as concerns type of elective neck dissection performed (p = 0.222). In conclusion, following a critical revision of 25 years' experience, at our Institution, in the management of cN0 necks in laryngeal cancer patients, definitive changes were observed in the surgical approach to the treatment of occult disease in cN0 cases. JND, compared to more extensive neck dissections, did not show statistically significant differences in terms of neck control (p = 0.233), in terms of impact on survival (p = 0.122) and in terms of accuracy as staging procedure (p = 0.794).
颈部淋巴结转移的管理是头颈癌临床医生面临的最具挑战性的问题之一。通过比较本机构先前发表的相关论文中报告的历史数据,对1978年至今治疗的N0期喉癌患者的结果进行了回顾性评估。本研究使用了2207例连续的cN0期喉鳞状细胞癌患者的病历作为数据来源。在进行原发治疗的同时,759例(34.4%)患者接受了至少单侧选择性颈清扫术,其余1448例(65.6%)患者接受观察等待方案。总体而言,在选择性颈清扫组(ED)中:128例(16.9%)患者接受了经典根治性颈清扫术,403例(53.1%)患者接受了功能性颈清扫术(FND),228例(30.0%)患者接受了颈静脉淋巴结清扫术(JND,切除Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ区)。在ED组的125例患者中,对侧N0颈部也进行了颈部手术,其中分别有15例为根治性颈清扫术、35例为功能性颈清扫术和75例为颈静脉淋巴结清扫术。基于这一大型系列人群,评估了N0期喉癌选择性颈部治疗理念的变化,从根治性颈清扫术到功能性颈清扫术再到颈静脉淋巴结清扫术。就作为分期程序的可靠性而言,根治性颈清扫术、功能性颈清扫术和颈静脉淋巴结清扫术之间未发现统计学显著差异(p = 0.794)。根据Kaplan-Meier方法估计,所有ED患者的5年颈部复发率为7.7%。根治性颈清扫术、功能性颈清扫术和颈静脉淋巴结清扫术组之间的5年颈部复发率未检测到显著差异(p = 0.178)。在生存曲线方面,在我们的系列研究中,就Kaplan-Meier分析的精算生存率而言,未观察到所进行的选择性颈清扫术类型之间存在差异(p = 0.222)。总之,在对本机构25年经验进行批判性回顾后,在喉癌患者cN0颈部的管理中,观察到cN0病例隐匿性疾病治疗的手术方法有了明确变化。与更广泛的颈清扫术相比,颈静脉淋巴结清扫术在颈部控制方面(p = 0.233)、对生存的影响方面(p = 0.122)以及作为分期程序的准确性方面(p = 0.794)均未显示出统计学显著差异。