Armitage G C
School of Dentistry, University of California San Francisco 94143-0650, USA.
Ann Periodontol. 1999 Dec;4(1):1-6. doi: 10.1902/annals.1999.4.1.1.
Classification systems are necessary in order to provide a framework in which to scientifically study the etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of diseases in an orderly fashion. In addition, such systems give clinicians a way to organize the health care needs of their patients. The last time scientists and clinicians in the field of periodontology and related areas agreed upon a classification system for periodontal diseases was in 1989 at the World Workshop in Clinical Periodontics. Subsequently, a simpler classification was agreed upon at the 1st European Workshop in Periodontology. These classification systems have been widely used by clinicians and research scientists throughout the world. Unfortunately, the 1989 classification had many shortcomings including: 1) considerable overlap in disease categories, 2) absence of a gingival disease component, 3) inappropriate emphasis on age of onset of disease and rates of progression, and 4) inadequate or unclear classification criteria. The 1993 European classification lacked the detail necessary for adequate characterization of the broad spectrum of periodontal diseases encountered in clinical practice. The need for a revised classification system for periodontal diseases was emphasized during the 1996 World Workshop in Periodontics. In 1997 the American Academy of Periodontology responded to this need and formed a committee to plan and organize an international workshop to revise the classification system for periodontal diseases. The proceedings in this volume are the result of this reclassification effort. The process involved development by the Organizing Committee of an outline for a new classification and identification of individuals to write state-of-the-science reviews for each of the items on the outline. The reviewers were encouraged to depart from the preliminary outline if there were data to support any modifications. On October 30-November 2, 1999, the International Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal Diseases and Conditions was held and a new classification was agreed upon (Fig. 1). This paper summarizes how the new classification for periodontal diseases and conditions presented in this volume differs from the classification system developed at the 1989 World Workshop in Clinical Periodontics. In addition, an analysis of the rationale is provided for each of the modifications and changes.
分类系统是必要的,以便提供一个框架,在这个框架内能够以有序的方式科学地研究疾病的病因、发病机制和治疗方法。此外,这样的系统为临床医生提供了一种组织其患者医疗保健需求的方法。牙周病学及相关领域的科学家和临床医生上一次就牙周疾病的分类系统达成共识是在1989年的临床牙周病学世界研讨会上。随后,在第一届欧洲牙周病学研讨会上达成了一个更简单的分类。这些分类系统已被全世界的临床医生和研究科学家广泛使用。不幸的是,1989年的分类有许多缺点,包括:1)疾病类别有相当大的重叠,2)没有牙龈疾病部分,3)对疾病发病年龄和进展速度的强调不当,4)分类标准不足或不明确。1993年的欧洲分类缺乏对临床实践中遇到的广泛牙周疾病进行充分描述所需的细节。在1996年的牙周病学世界研讨会上强调了对牙周疾病修订分类系统的必要性。1997年,美国牙周病学会响应这一需求,成立了一个委员会来规划和组织一次国际研讨会,以修订牙周疾病的分类系统。本卷中的论文集就是这次重新分类工作的成果。这个过程包括由组织委员会制定一个新分类的大纲,并确定人员为大纲上的每个项目撰写科学现状综述。如果有数据支持任何修改,鼓励审稿人偏离初步大纲。1999年10月30日至11月2日,举行了牙周疾病和状况分类国际研讨会,并达成了一个新的分类(图1)。本文总结了本卷中提出的牙周疾病和状况的新分类与1989年临床牙周病学世界研讨会上制定的分类系统有何不同。此外,还为每一项修改和变化提供了理由分析。