Hall K, Giles-Corti B
Department of Public Health, University of Western Australia.
Aust Fam Physician. 2000 Jun;29(6):602-6.
The purpose of this study was to identify the knowledge, attitudes and referral patterns of general practitioners (GPs) toward 10 specific complementary therapies.
The study was a descriptive cross-sectional postal survey, conducted between July 1998 and August 1998 inclusive. A random selection of 200 male and 200 female Western Australian GPs residing in Perth and listed in the Australian Medical Association database file of registered GPs.
The response rate was 74.8% (n = 282). Over 90% of these GPs reported having been approached by more than 30 patients seeking their advice about complementary therapies in the past nine months. The majority of these patients were women, over the age of 35 years. Ten complementary therapies were listed in the questionnaire: acupuncture, hypnosis, meditation, spinal manipulation, yoga, homeopathy, herbal medicine, naturopathy, massage and aromatherapy. Just under half (132) of the respondents had undertaken studies in at least one of the listed complementary therapies, with over 60% reporting a wish for further training. Overall, 67.8% (191) of all respondents reported they were in favour of GP referrals to complementary therapists. However, 56.1% (158) were against complementary therapies being included in rebates for private health insurance. Overall, 75.0% (211) of GPs surveyed had already formally referred a patient to one or more of the listed therapies, the most frequent of these being acupuncture, massage, meditation, hypnosis and spinal manipulation as a part of their overall medical treatment.
Perth GPs have a high level of interest in complementary therapies. Government regulation and registration of complementary therapies is seen by GPs as important in order to ensure professional standards of practice. Given the high level of interest, provision of undergraduate and postgraduate education in complementary therapies could be considered. In addition, the development of clinical guidelines would be of benefit.
本研究旨在确定全科医生(GPs)对10种特定补充疗法的知识、态度和转诊模式。
该研究为描述性横断面邮寄调查,于1998年7月至1998年8月(含)期间进行。从居住在珀斯且列于澳大利亚医学协会注册全科医生数据库文件中的200名男性和200名女性西澳大利亚全科医生中随机选取。
回复率为74.8%(n = 282)。超过90%的这些全科医生报告称,在过去九个月里有超过30名患者就补充疗法向他们寻求建议。这些患者大多数为35岁以上的女性。问卷中列出了10种补充疗法:针灸、催眠、冥想、脊柱推拿、瑜伽、顺势疗法、草药医学、自然疗法、按摩和芳香疗法。略少于一半(132名)的受访者对至少一种列出的补充疗法进行过研究,超过60%的人表示希望接受进一步培训。总体而言,所有受访者中有67.8%(191名)报告他们赞成全科医生将患者转诊给补充疗法治疗师。然而,56.1%(158名)反对将补充疗法纳入私人健康保险回扣范围。总体而言,接受调查的全科医生中有75.0%(211名)已经正式将一名患者转诊至一种或多种列出的疗法,其中最常见的是针灸、按摩、冥想、催眠和脊柱推拿,作为其整体医疗的一部分。
珀斯的全科医生对补充疗法有很高的兴趣。全科医生认为对补充疗法进行政府监管和注册对于确保专业执业标准很重要。鉴于兴趣浓厚,可以考虑提供补充疗法的本科和研究生教育。此外,制定临床指南会有帮助。