• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应与新奇:进化生物学中的目的论解释

Adaptation and novelty: teleological explanations in evolutionary biology.

作者信息

Ayala F J

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine 92697-2525, USA.

出版信息

Hist Philos Life Sci. 1999;21(1):3-33.

PMID:10865876
Abstract

Knives, birds' wings, and mountain slopes are used for certain purposes: cutting, flying, and climbing. A bird's wings have in common with knives that they have been 'designed' for the purpose they serve, which purpose accounts for their existence, whereas mountain slopes have come about by geological processes independently of their uses for climbing. A bird's wings differ from a knife in that they have not been designed or produced by any conscious agent; rather, the wings, like the slopes, are outcomes of natural processes without any intentional causation. Evolutionary biologists use teleological language and teleological explanations. I propose that this use is appropriate, because teleological explanations are hypotheses that can be subject to empirical testing. The distinctiveness of teleological hypotheses is that they account for the existence of a feature in terms of the function it serves; for example, wings have evolved and persist because flying is beneficial to birds by increasing their chances of surviving and reproducing. Features of organisms that are explained with teleological hypotheses include structures, such as wings; processes, such as development from egg to adult; and behaviours, such as nest building. A proximate explanation of these features is the function they serve; an ultimate explanation that they all share is their contribution to the reproductive fitness of the organisms. I distinguish several kinds of teleological explanations, such as natural and artificial, as well as bounded and unbounded, some of which but not others apply to biological explanations.

摘要

刀、鸟的翅膀和山坡都有特定的用途:切割、飞行和攀爬。鸟的翅膀与刀的共同之处在于,它们是为其所服务的目的而“设计”的,这个目的解释了它们的存在,而山坡是由地质过程形成的,与它们用于攀爬的用途无关。鸟的翅膀与刀的不同之处在于,它们不是由任何有意识的主体设计或制造的;相反,翅膀和山坡一样,是自然过程的结果,没有任何有意的因果关系。进化生物学家使用目的论语言和目的论解释。我认为这种用法是恰当的,因为目的论解释是可以接受实证检验的假设。目的论假设的独特之处在于,它们根据一个特征所服务的功能来解释其存在;例如,翅膀的进化和留存是因为飞行对鸟类有益,增加了它们生存和繁殖的机会。用目的论假设来解释的生物体特征包括结构,如翅膀;过程,如从卵到成年的发育;以及行为,如筑巢。对这些特征的直接解释是它们所服务的功能;它们都共有的最终解释是它们对生物体繁殖适应性的贡献。我区分了几种目的论解释,如自然的和人工的,以及有界的和无界的,其中一些适用于生物学解释,而另一些则不适用。

相似文献

1
Adaptation and novelty: teleological explanations in evolutionary biology.适应与新奇:进化生物学中的目的论解释
Hist Philos Life Sci. 1999;21(1):3-33.
2
Natural selection and the conditions for existence: representational vs. conditional teleology in biological explanation.自然选择与生存条件:生物学解释中的表征目的论与条件目的论
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2005;27(2):249-80.
3
Consequence etiology and biological teleology in Aristotle and Darwin.亚里士多德与达尔文思想中的因果关系、病因学及生物目的论
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2008 Dec;39(4):379-90. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2008.09.001. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
4
Functional explanation and the function of explanation.功能解释与解释的功能。
Cognition. 2006 Mar;99(2):167-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009. Epub 2005 Jun 6.
5
Evolutionary explanations in medicine: how do they differ and how to benefit from them.医学中的进化解释:它们有何不同,以及如何从中受益。
Med Hypotheses. 2010 Apr;74(4):746-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
6
The morphological basis of the arm-to-wing transition.从手臂到翅膀转变的形态学基础。
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Feb;33(2):277-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.11.020.
7
An extended synthesis for evolutionary biology.进化生物学的扩展综合理论。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jun;1168:218-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04578.x.
8
Why don't zebras have machine guns? Adaptation, selection, and constraints in evolutionary theory.为什么斑马没有机关枪?进化理论中的适应、选择与限制
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2008 Mar;39(1):135-46. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
9
Manipulative signals in family conflict? On the function of maternal yolk hormones in birds.家庭冲突中的操纵信号?鸟类母体卵黄激素的功能
Am Nat. 2007 Apr;169(4):E84-96. doi: 10.1086/511962.
10
Chance, explanation, and causation in evolutionary theory.进化理论中的偶然性、解释与因果关系。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2005;27(3-4):395-405.

引用本文的文献

1
Living Control Systems: Exploring a Teleonomic Account of Behavior in .生命控制系统:探索一种关于行为的目的论解释
Insects. 2025 Aug 16;16(8):848. doi: 10.3390/insects16080848.
2
Persistence selection between simulated biogeochemical cycle variants for their distinct effects on the Earth system.针对模拟的生物地球化学循环变体对地球系统的不同影响进行持续选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 18;122(7):e2406344122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2406344122. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
3
Teleonomy: Revisiting a Proposed Conceptual Replacement for Teleology.
目的性:重新审视一个提议的取代目的论的概念。
Biol Theory. 2023;18(2):101-113. doi: 10.1007/s13752-022-00424-y. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
4
Homeostasis as a fundamental principle for a coherent theory of brains.作为大脑连贯理论的基本原则的内稳态。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Jun 10;374(1774):20180373. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0373.
5
Why we don't want another "Synthesis".为何我们不想要另一个“综合报告”。
Biol Direct. 2017 Oct 2;12(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13062-017-0194-1.
6
A central theory of biology.生物学的一个核心理论。
Med Hypotheses. 2015 Jul;85(1):49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.03.019. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
7
What is a resistance gene? Ranking risk in resistomes.什么是抗性基因?抗性组中的风险排序。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 Feb;13(2):116-23. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3399. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
8
Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE.垃圾 DNA 是无稽之谈吗?对 ENCODE 的批判。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 2;110(14):5294-300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221376110. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
9
Functional information and the emergence of biocomplexity.功能信息与生物复杂性的出现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):8574-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701744104. Epub 2007 May 9.
10
A calculus of purpose.目的的权衡
PLoS Biol. 2004 Jun;2(6):e164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020164. Epub 2004 Jun 15.