Waters H R
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Aug;51(4):599-612. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00003-4.
This article develops and uses methodologies to: (1) measure equity in the distribution of access to health services; and (2) measure the impact of health insurance programs on equity. The article proposes two egalitarian-based indicators for measuring equity in terms of access to health care--a concentration coefficient derived from the Gini coefficient, and the Atkinson distributional measure and also employs a weighted Utilitarian social welfare function to measure overall levels of access. The article defines access as the use of health care by individuals with a need for care; need is measured as self-reported morbidity. The setting for the empirical application is the country of Ecuador. The Ecuador Social Security Institute runs a General Health Insurance (GHI) program, whose affiliates are primarily workers in the formal sector of the economy. The principal data source is the 1995 Ecuador Living Standards Measurement Survey. The study uses a microeconomic health care demand model and bivariate probit estimation techniques to measure the impact of insurance on health service use for each quintile of adjusted per-capita household expenditure. The study also predicts health care use and program impact for each quintile under a series of simulation scenarios corresponding to proposed expansion of eligibility for the GHI program. The GHI program increases overall access to health care, but has a negative impact on equity in the distribution of health services. The benefits of the program, calculated as its marginal impact on the probability of using of health care, have a strongly regressive distribution. Expanding eligibility to the self-employed makes the benefit more equitably distributed (but still inequitable), and increases overall social welfare considerably. Expanding eligibility to the dependents of the insured person has similar effects, although less important in magnitude.
(1)衡量获得医疗服务机会分配的公平性;(2)衡量医疗保险计划对公平性的影响。本文提出了两个基于平等主义的指标来衡量医疗保健可及性方面的公平性——一个从基尼系数推导出来的集中系数,以及阿特金森分配测度,并且还采用加权功利主义社会福利函数来衡量总体可及性水平。本文将可及性定义为有医疗需求的个人对医疗保健的使用;需求通过自我报告的发病率来衡量。实证应用的背景是厄瓜多尔。厄瓜多尔社会保障局运营着一项综合健康保险(GHI)计划,其附属对象主要是经济正规部门的工人。主要数据来源是1995年厄瓜多尔生活水平测量调查。该研究使用微观经济医疗保健需求模型和双变量概率估计技术,来衡量保险对调整后的人均家庭支出每个五分位数的医疗服务使用的影响。该研究还在一系列与提议扩大GHI计划资格相对应的模拟情景下,预测了每个五分位数的医疗保健使用情况和计划影响。GHI计划增加了总体医疗保健可及性,但对医疗服务分配的公平性有负面影响。该计划的收益,以其对使用医疗保健概率的边际影响来计算,具有强烈的累退分布。将资格扩大到个体经营者会使收益分配更公平(但仍然不公平),并大幅提高总体社会福利。将资格扩大到被保险人的家属有类似效果,尽管在程度上不太重要。