Suppr超能文献

技术如何影响癌症患者及其医疗保健提供者之间的沟通:系统文献回顾。

How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review.

机构信息

School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07047, USA.

School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, 07047, USA.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104430. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To ensure the well-being of their patients, health care providers (HCPs) are putting more effort into the quality of the communication they provide in oncology clinics. With the emergence of Health Information Technology (HIT), the dynamics between doctors and patients in oncology settings have changed. The purpose of this literature review is to explore and demonstrate how various health information technologies impact doctor-patient communication in oncology settings.

METHOD

A systematic literature review was conducted in 4 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore) to select publications that are in English, published between January 2009 and September 2020. This review reports outcomes related to the impacts of using health information technologies on doctor-patient communication according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA).

RESULTS

We identified 31 studies which satisfied the selection and eligibility criteria. The review revealed a diverse range of HIT used to support communication between cancer patients and their HCPs in oncology settings. Outcomes related to communication were examined to demonstrate how technology can improve access to care in clinical settings and online. When technology is used effectively to support patient knowledge and shared understanding, this increases the patient's satisfaction and ability to manage emotions, make decisions, and progress in their treatment, in addition to increasing social support and building a stronger therapeutic alliance based on shared knowledge and transparency between clinicians and patients.

CONCLUSION

Technology-based solutions can help strengthen the relationship and communication between patients and their doctors. They can empower the patient's well-being, help doctors make better decisions and enhance the therapeutic alliance between them. Thus, using technology to enhance communication in healthcare settings remains beneficial if its use is structured and target oriented. Future studies should focus on comparing in-depth the difference between outpatient and inpatient settings in terms of the efforts required and the extent of the impacts from both clinicians' and cancer patients' perspectives.

摘要

目的

为了确保患者的福祉,医疗保健提供者(HCPs)更加注重他们在肿瘤诊所提供的沟通质量。随着健康信息技术(HIT)的出现,肿瘤环境中医生和患者之间的动态关系发生了变化。本文献综述的目的是探讨和展示各种健康信息技术如何影响肿瘤环境中的医患沟通。

方法

在 4 个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane、Web of Science、IEEE Xplore)中进行了系统的文献综述,以选择发表于 2009 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月期间的英文出版物。本综述根据系统评价和荟萃分析综述和荟萃分析指南(PRISMA)报告与使用健康信息技术对医患沟通的影响相关的结果。

结果

我们确定了 31 项符合选择和资格标准的研究。该综述揭示了各种用于支持肿瘤环境中癌症患者与其 HCPs 之间沟通的 HIT。检查了与沟通相关的结果,以展示技术如何改善临床环境和在线环境中的护理可及性。当技术被有效地用于支持患者的知识和共同理解时,这会提高患者的满意度和管理情绪、做出决策以及在治疗中取得进展的能力,此外还会增加社会支持并在医患之间建立基于共同知识和透明度的更强治疗联盟。

结论

基于技术的解决方案可以帮助加强患者及其医生之间的关系和沟通。它们可以增强患者的幸福感,帮助医生做出更好的决策,并增强他们之间的治疗联盟。因此,如果技术的使用是结构化和有针对性的,那么在医疗保健环境中使用技术来增强沟通仍然是有益的。未来的研究应重点从医生和癌症患者的角度深入比较门诊和住院环境在所需努力和影响程度方面的差异。

相似文献

1
How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review.
Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104430. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
2
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 24;7(7):CD003751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003751.pub4.
4
Experiences of health professionals towards using mobile electrocardiogram (ECG) technology: A qualitative systematic review.
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3205-3218. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16434. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review on the technology's role in supporting lung cancer patients in the treatment journey.
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 13;8(1):516. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01913-7.
3
Technology access, use, socioeconomic status, and healthcare disparities among African Americans in the US.
Front Public Health. 2025 May 28;13:1547189. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1547189. eCollection 2025.
4
Engagement with Programmatic Electronic Communications Among Young Adults with Breast Cancer.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 May 5;33(6):451. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09490-x.
5
Glioblastoma Patient and Caregiver Perspectives of Treatment Side-Effects and Information Provision.
J Patient Exp. 2025 Apr 10;12:23743735251331770. doi: 10.1177/23743735251331770. eCollection 2025.
6
Perspectives of Healthcare Providers and Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma on Treatment Priorities and Novel Therapies.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Apr 16;19:1089-1104. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S496106. eCollection 2025.
7
Unlocking the potentials of digital twins for optimal healthcare delivery in Africa.
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2024 Sep 16;2:oqae039. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqae039. eCollection 2024.
8
Telehealth adoption in palliative care: a systematic review of patient barriers and facilitators.
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Feb 26;24(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01698-2.
10
Understanding Multi-Level Factors Impacting Digital Health Literacy in the Deep South of the United States.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 31;22(1):41. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010041.

本文引用的文献

3
How do social media users process cancer prevention messages on Facebook? An eye-tracking study.
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jun;103(6):1161-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
4
An exploratory study in breast cancer of factors involved in the use and communication with health professionals of Internet information.
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Oct;28(10):4989-4996. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05335-x. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
5
The Role of a Symptom Assessment Tool in Shaping Patient-Physician Communication in Palliative Care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jan;59(1):30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.024. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
A pilot study of a smartphone-based monitoring intervention on head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemo-radiotherapy.
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Sep;129:404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
A smartphone Chatbot application to optimize monitoring of older patients with cancer.
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Aug;128:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 14.
10
Oncologists' Views Regarding the Role of Electronic Health Records in Care Coordination.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-12. doi: 10.1200/CCI.17.00118.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验