Suppr超能文献

慢性下腰痛患者的有氧适能测试:哪种测试最佳?

Aerobic fitness testing in patients with chronic low back pain: which test is best?

作者信息

Wittink H, Michel T H, Kulich R, Wagner A, Sukiennik A, Maciewicz R, Rogers W

机构信息

New England Medical Center, Pain Management Clinic, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jul 1;25(13):1704-10. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200007010-00015.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

This is a randomized comparison of three exercise tests in a sample of 30 patients with chronic low back pain.

OBJECTIVES

To determine, by comparing three exercise tests, which test yields the highest peak and predicted oxygen consumption in a sample of patients with chronic low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Little is known about the level of aerobic fitness in patients with chronic low back pain, although many rehabilitation programs emphasize aerobic exercise as an important part of their therapy. Measurement of aerobic fitness levels in these patients remains a problem. In healthy individuals, the highest oxygen consumption values come from exercise tests that use the largest muscle groups. For a number of reasons, this may not be true in patients with chronic low back pain.

METHODS

In this study, 30 participants with chronic low back pain performed three symptom-limited maximal exercise tests: a treadmill, an upper extremity ergometer, and a bicycle ergometer. The tests were administered in randomized order. Heart rate was continuously monitored and oxygen consumption in terms of mL/kg/minute was measured by indirect calorimetry each 30 seconds.

RESULTS

The statistical difference among the tests was highly significant (P < 0.0001). The treadmill test yielded the highest peak and predicted oxygen consumption followed by the bicycle and the upper extremity ergometer test, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The treadmill test is the best test for measuring aerobic fitness levels in patients with chronic low back pain. It yielded the highest peak oxygen consumption compared with the other tests, coming closest to measuring maximal oxygen consumption.

摘要

研究设计

这是一项对30例慢性下腰痛患者进行的三种运动测试的随机对照研究。

目的

通过比较三种运动测试,确定在慢性下腰痛患者样本中哪种测试能产生最高的峰值和预测耗氧量。

背景数据总结

尽管许多康复项目强调有氧运动是其治疗的重要组成部分,但对于慢性下腰痛患者的有氧适能水平知之甚少。测量这些患者的有氧适能水平仍然是一个问题。在健康个体中,最高耗氧量值来自使用最大肌肉群的运动测试。由于多种原因,在慢性下腰痛患者中可能并非如此。

方法

在本研究中,30名慢性下腰痛参与者进行了三项症状限制的最大运动测试:跑步机测试、上肢测力计测试和自行车测力计测试。测试按随机顺序进行。持续监测心率,每30秒通过间接测热法测量以毫升/千克/分钟为单位的耗氧量。

结果

测试之间的统计学差异非常显著(P < 0.0001)。跑步机测试产生的峰值和预测耗氧量最高,其次分别是自行车测试和上肢测力计测试。

结论

跑步机测试是测量慢性下腰痛患者有氧适能水平的最佳测试。与其他测试相比,它产生的峰值耗氧量最高,最接近测量最大耗氧量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验