• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[双耳辨别测试中旧评估模式与新评估模式的比较]

[Comparison between the old and new evaluation mode in the dichotic discrimination test].

作者信息

Berger R, Demirakca T

机构信息

Abteilung Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, MZ der Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Philipps-Universität Marburg.

出版信息

HNO. 2000 May;48(5):390-3.

PMID:10872121
Abstract

The dichotic discrimination test for children could make an important contribution to the diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders. With previous test procedures and their interpretation it was not possible to get the auditory discrimination ability in only one grade. To evaluate this ability, it was necessary to measure the degree of comprehension in each ear as well as the required noise level. The evaluation cannot be used for statistical results because there are too many parameters. Moreover, results apparently similar can come from varying abilities. We are therefore working on a new method to evaluate dichotic hearing more accurately. By using a constant noise level and only evaluating positively those hearing pairs which have been repeated correctly, we arrive at one single grade. The dichotic discrimination test was administered to 46 children with auditory perception disorders and the results evaluated according to both, the previous and new evaluation system. According to the new evaluation, a maximum of 20 correct responses is possible. The average number of correct responses was significantly lower than by the previous evaluation system. The standard deviation increased from 16% on the left side and 13% in the right to 24%, or five word-pairs. The difference is even clearer when the test is subdivided into four performance ranges, each of 25%. Of all the children examined, 85% fell in the upper performance range according to the previous evaluation. No child was in the lowest performance range. According to the new evaluation, only 56.5% of the children were in the upper performance range, while three children, that is 6.5%, were in the lowest performance range. This difference, P = 0.0002, is highly significant. Our results demonstrate clearly that on the basis of the new evaluation system the measurement of dichotic ability is possible, for the first time. We consider the new evaluation method to be an improvement in determining dichotic discrimination and in comparing it with other abilities. To check the validity, further independent testing should be carried out and results compared with those obtained from children without auditory perception disorders.

摘要

儿童双耳辨别测试对中枢听觉处理障碍的诊断可能会有重要贡献。采用以前的测试程序及其解释方法,无法仅用一个等级来评估听觉辨别能力。为了评估这种能力,有必要测量每只耳朵的理解程度以及所需的噪声水平。由于参数过多,该评估不能用于统计结果。此外,看似相似的结果可能来自不同的能力。因此,我们正在研究一种新方法,以更准确地评估双耳听力。通过使用恒定的噪声水平,并且只对正确重复的听力对进行正向评估,我们得出一个单一的等级。对46名有听觉感知障碍的儿童进行了双耳辨别测试,并根据旧的和新的评估系统对结果进行了评估。根据新的评估,最多可能有20个正确反应。正确反应的平均数量明显低于旧的评估系统。标准差从左侧的16%和右侧的13%增加到24%,即五个单词对。当测试细分为四个表现范围,每个范围为25%时,差异更加明显。在所有接受检查的儿童中,根据旧的评估,85%处于较高表现范围。没有儿童处于最低表现范围。根据新的评估,只有56.5%的儿童处于较高表现范围,而三名儿童,即6.5%,处于最低表现范围。这种差异,P = 0.0002,具有高度显著性。我们的结果清楚地表明,基于新的评估系统,首次有可能测量双耳能力。我们认为新的评估方法在确定双耳辨别以及将其与其他能力进行比较方面是一种改进。为了检验有效性,应该进行进一步的独立测试,并将结果与没有听觉感知障碍的儿童所获得的结果进行比较。

相似文献

1
[Comparison between the old and new evaluation mode in the dichotic discrimination test].[双耳辨别测试中旧评估模式与新评估模式的比较]
HNO. 2000 May;48(5):390-3.
2
Odds of demonstrating auditory processing abnormality in the average older adult: the Blue Mountains Hearing Study.普通老年人出现听觉处理异常的几率:蓝山听力研究
Ear Hear. 2006 Apr;27(2):129-38. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000202328.19037.ff.
3
Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.发育性口吃中的言语双耳分听:具有非典型听觉加工的亚组
Cogn Behav Neurol. 2004 Dec;17(4):224-32.
4
[Assessment of the Dichotic Listening Test by Feldmann in children with developmental reading and spelling disorders].[费尔德曼对发育性阅读和拼写障碍儿童的双耳分听测试评估]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2001 Oct;80(10):610-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17836.
5
[(Central) Auditory Processing Disorders in 8 - 10-year-old children: which tests distinguish between normal and impaired children?].8至10岁儿童的(中枢性)听觉处理障碍:哪些测试能够区分正常儿童和受损儿童?
Laryngorhinootologie. 2009 Jul;88(7):469-76. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119403. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
6
[Diagnosis of central hearing disorders in childhood].[儿童中枢性听力障碍的诊断]
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1988 Jun;67(6):312-5.
7
[Identification of auditory laterality by means of a new dichotic digit test in Spanish, and body laterality and spatial orientation in children with dyslexia and in controls].[通过一项新的西班牙语双耳数字测试以及对诵读困难儿童和对照组儿童的身体偏侧性和空间定向来识别听觉偏侧性]
Rev Neurol. 2005;41(4):198-205.
8
Development and standardization of single and double dichotic digit tests in the Malay language.马来语单双耳数字测试的开发与标准化
Int J Audiol. 2006 Jun;45(6):344-52. doi: 10.1080/14992020600582174.
9
Children with rolandic epilepsy have abnormalities of oromotor and dichotic listening performance.罗兰多癫痫患儿存在口面部运动及双耳分听功能异常。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Sep;47(9):603-8.
10
Beneficial auditory and cognitive effects of auditory brainstem implantation in children.儿童听觉脑干植入的有益听觉和认知效应。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Sep;127(9):943-6. doi: 10.1080/00016480601110253.

引用本文的文献

1
[Central auditory processing in adolescents with communication impairments].[有沟通障碍青少年的中枢听觉处理]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2020 Nov;99(11):795-802. doi: 10.1055/a-1177-1240. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
2
[Guideline: Auditory Processing and Perception Disorders: Diagnostics : S1-Guideline of The German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology].[指南:听觉处理与感知障碍:诊断:德国言语治疗与儿科听力学协会S1指南]
HNO. 2019 Aug;67(8):566-575. doi: 10.1007/s00106-019-0630-x.
3
[Auditory processing and perception disorders--diagnostics. Guidelines of the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology].
[听觉处理与感知障碍——诊断。德国言语治疗与儿童听力学协会指南]
HNO. 2010 Nov;58(11):1124-7. doi: 10.1007/s00106-010-2172-0.
4
[Speech perception in noise with and without FM technology].[有和没有调频技术时噪声环境下的言语感知]
HNO. 2010 Jul;58(7):674-9. doi: 10.1007/s00106-010-2086-x.
5
[Hearing aids in the elderly. Why is the accommodation so difficult?].[老年人使用助听器。为何适应如此困难?]
HNO. 2004 Apr;52(4):321-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-004-1058-4.
6
[Audiologic diagnosis in children. Applicability of different speech material].[儿童听力诊断。不同言语材料的适用性]
HNO. 2004 Feb;52(2):156-61. doi: 10.1007/s00106-003-0891-1.