• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[儿童听力诊断。不同言语材料的适用性]

[Audiologic diagnosis in children. Applicability of different speech material].

作者信息

Feldhusen F, Möhring L, Brunner M, Troost J, Spielberger C, Braun-Frank L, Schoenfelder D, Pröschel U

机构信息

Abt. f. Stimm- und Sprachstörungen sowie Pädaudiologie, Universitäts-HNO-Klinik, INF 400, 69120 Heidelberg.

出版信息

HNO. 2004 Feb;52(2):156-61. doi: 10.1007/s00106-003-0891-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00106-003-0891-1
PMID:14968321
Abstract

The aim of our study was to establish bench-mark values for speech intelligibility in noise for children. We also considered which of the two dichotic discrimination tests, Feldmann's or Uttenweiler's, would be most suitable for use within this age group. We examined 102 children aged between 7 and 10 years (second year, primary school), with an average age of 8 years. After confirming normal hearing acuity (examination of the ear, tympanometry and audiogram), speech perception was tested. This was performed with and without noise using the Göttingen Audiometric Speech Test for Children II and the monosyllables of the Freiburger Speech Intelligibility Test. The percentage of word intelligibility was recorded. Furthermore, dichotic hearing was tested using a combination of Feldmann and Uttenweiler dichotic discrimination tests. We rated the percentage of correct word pair repetitions with the correct article. The results showed that the best method for testing speech perception in noise for this age group was the Göttingen Test II for Children. Speech perception below 70% for word intelligibility should be considered as pathologic. For testing dichotic hearing, Uttenweiler's dichotic discrimination test for children was most suitable. In this test values below 80% should be considered as pathologic.

摘要

我们研究的目的是确定儿童在噪声环境下言语清晰度的基准值。我们还考虑了两种双耳辨别测试(费尔德曼测试或乌滕魏勒测试)中哪一种最适合在这个年龄组中使用。我们检查了102名年龄在7至10岁(小学二年级)之间的儿童,平均年龄为8岁。在确认听力正常(耳部检查、鼓室图和声图)后,对言语感知进行了测试。这是使用哥廷根儿童听力计言语测试II和弗赖堡言语清晰度测试的单音节词,分别在有噪声和无噪声的情况下进行的。记录单词清晰度的百分比。此外,使用费尔德曼和乌滕魏勒双耳辨别测试的组合对双耳听力进行了测试。我们对正确冠词的正确单词对重复百分比进行了评分。结果表明,对于这个年龄组,测试噪声环境下言语感知的最佳方法是哥廷根儿童测试II。单词清晰度低于70%的言语感知应被视为病理性的。对于测试双耳听力,乌滕魏勒儿童双耳辨别测试最为合适。在该测试中,低于80%的值应被视为病理性的。

相似文献

1
[Audiologic diagnosis in children. Applicability of different speech material].[儿童听力诊断。不同言语材料的适用性]
HNO. 2004 Feb;52(2):156-61. doi: 10.1007/s00106-003-0891-1.
2
[On the diagnostics of structural deficits in dyslexia in clinical work: relationship between different achievement indicators].[临床工作中阅读障碍结构性缺陷的诊断:不同成绩指标之间的关系]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2003 Feb;82(2):83-91. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-37725.
3
[Problems and possible solutions in evaluation of dichotic discrimination tests for children].[儿童双耳分听辨别测试评估中的问题及可能的解决方案]
HNO. 1998 Aug;46(8):753-6. doi: 10.1007/s001060050306.
4
[Comparison between the old and new evaluation mode in the dichotic discrimination test].[双耳辨别测试中旧评估模式与新评估模式的比较]
HNO. 2000 May;48(5):390-3.
5
The Speech Intelligibility Index and the pure-tone average as predictors of lexical ability in children fit with hearing AIDS.言语可懂度指数和纯音平均值可预测佩戴助听器儿童的词汇能力。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Jun;55(3):764-78. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0264). Epub 2012 Jan 5.
6
Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.噪声环境下言语感知时的认知负荷:年龄、听力损失和认知对瞳孔反应的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):498-510. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb.
7
Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment.影响言语测听评估的语言因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7249848. doi: 10.1155/2016/7249848. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
8
[CAPD in 2nd-graders of primary schools: which tests discriminate normal from impaired children?].[小学二年级学生的持续性非卧床腹膜透析:哪些测试能区分正常儿童和受损儿童?]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2013 Sep;92(9):594-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299758. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
9
[Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss].[言语测试:在噪声性听力损失个体中的应用]
Pro Fono. 2004 Sep-Dec;16(3):293-300.
10
Speech and language development in a population of Swedish hearing-impaired pre-school children, a cross-sectional study.瑞典听力受损学龄前儿童群体的言语和语言发展:一项横断面研究
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jul;71(7):1061-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.03.016. Epub 2007 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
[Dichotic speech recognition with cochlear implants].[人工耳蜗的双耳分听语音识别]
HNO. 2019 Oct;67(10):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00106-019-00728-9.
2
Current audiological diagnostics.当前的听力学诊断
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 18;16:Doc09. doi: 10.3205/cto000148. eCollection 2017.
3
[Auditory processing and perception disorders (AVWS). Three theses on diagnosis and therapy].[听觉处理与感知障碍(AVWS)。关于诊断与治疗的三个论点]

本文引用的文献

1
[DICHOTIC DISCRIMINATION TEST, A NEW METHOD FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CENTRAL HEARING DISORDERS].[双耳辨别测试,一种诊断中枢性听力障碍的新方法]
Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1965 Mar 11;184:294-329.
2
[Comparison between the old and new evaluation mode in the dichotic discrimination test].[双耳辨别测试中旧评估模式与新评估模式的比较]
HNO. 2000 May;48(5):390-3.
3
[The Göttingen audiometric speech test for children. II. Speech audiometry of the pre-school child with a monosyllabic picture-test (author's transl)].[儿童的哥廷根听力言语测试。II. 采用单音节图片测试法对学龄前儿童进行言语测听(作者译)]
HNO. 2007 May;55(5):331-2. doi: 10.1007/s00106-007-1566-0.
4
[Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test].[瑞士版弗莱堡言语可懂度测试规范值的验证]
HNO. 2006 Jun;54(6):445-50. doi: 10.1007/s00106-005-1337-8.
HNO. 1976 Nov;24(11):399-402.
4
[Dichotic hearing test in 750 German school-children (author's transl)].
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1975 Sep;54(9):747-55.