• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗种植体周围炎的致死性光致敏、自体骨和e-PTFE膜:初步结果

Lethal photosensitization, autogenous bone, and e-PTFE membrane for the treatment of peri-implantitis: preliminary results.

作者信息

Haas R, Baron M, Dörtbudak O, Watzek G

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery, Dental School, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 May-Jun;15(3):374-82.

PMID:10874802
Abstract

This clinical study reports on the results of a new method in the treatment of peri-implantitis. The surfaces of 24 plasma flame-sprayed cylindric implants in 17 patients who were diagnosed with peri-implantitis were decontaminated with a combination of toluidine blue (100 micrograms/mL) and laser irradiation at a wavelength of 906 nm. Bone defects were filled with autogenous bone using e-PTFE membranes for retention of the grafting material. Premature membrane exposure occurred in all patients after an average of 3 weeks (+/- 10 days), which required immediate removal of the exposed membrane in 1 patient. Since the soft tissue showed minimal signs of inflammation, the membranes were left in situ for another 6 weeks in all other patients. The mean radiographic peri-implant bone gain was 2 mm +/- 1.90 mm after 9.5 months (maxilla 2.5 mm +/- 2.38 mm; mandible 1.9 mm +/- 1.87 mm). Two implants around which the initial bone defect had already reached the basket had to be removed after 10 months and 35 months, respectively, despite radiographic evidence of improvement of the peri-implant defect. The longer the membrane stayed in situ, the more bone was gained, as long as the membrane was covered by soft tissue (P = .01). However, the longer an exposed membrane was left in place, the smaller the resultant bone gain (P = .0001). Therefore, despite the absence of clinical signs of inflammation, exposed membranes should be removed immediately. The short-term results of this study corroborate the efficacy of the applied treatment method in prolonging the service time of dental implants involved with peri-implantitis.

摘要

本临床研究报告了一种治疗种植体周围炎的新方法的结果。对17例被诊断为种植体周围炎患者的24个等离子火焰喷涂圆柱形种植体表面,采用甲苯胺蓝(100微克/毫升)和波长906纳米的激光照射相结合的方法进行去污处理。使用e-PTFE膜保留移植材料,用自体骨填充骨缺损。所有患者平均在3周(±10天)后均出现膜过早暴露,其中1例患者需要立即移除暴露的膜。由于软组织炎症迹象轻微,其他所有患者的膜均保留原位6周。9.5个月后,种植体周围骨平均影像学增益为2毫米±1.90毫米(上颌骨2.5毫米±2.38毫米;下颌骨1.9毫米±1.87毫米)。尽管影像学显示种植体周围缺损有所改善,但分别在10个月和35个月后,仍有两个种植体周围最初的骨缺损已达牙槽嵴顶,不得不将其移除。只要膜被软组织覆盖,膜在原位保留的时间越长,骨增益就越多(P = 0.01)。然而,暴露的膜保留原位的时间越长,最终的骨增益就越小(P = 0.0001)。因此,尽管没有炎症的临床体征,暴露的膜也应立即移除。本研究的短期结果证实了所应用的治疗方法在延长患有种植体周围炎的牙种植体使用寿命方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
Lethal photosensitization, autogenous bone, and e-PTFE membrane for the treatment of peri-implantitis: preliminary results.用于治疗种植体周围炎的致死性光致敏、自体骨和e-PTFE膜:初步结果
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 May-Jun;15(3):374-82.
2
Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.种植体周围炎的外科治疗
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:140-9.
3
Experimentally induced peri-implantitis: a review of different treatment methods described in the literature.实验性诱导种植体周围炎:文献中描述的不同治疗方法综述
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jul-Aug;15(4):533-44.
4
Lethal photosensitization and guided bone regeneration in treatment of peri-implantitis: an experimental study in dogs.致死性光敏化与引导骨再生治疗种植体周围炎:犬类实验研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Jun;17(3):273-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01167.x.
5
Treatment of ligature-induced peri-implantitis by lethal photosensitization and guided bone regeneration: a preliminary histologic study in dogs.通过致死性光致敏和引导性骨再生治疗结扎诱导的种植体周围炎:犬的初步组织学研究
J Periodontol. 2003 Mar;74(3):338-45. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.338.
6
Osseointegration of titanium implants following guided bone regeneration using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and various bone fillers.使用膨体聚四氟乙烯膜和各种骨填充材料引导骨再生后钛种植体的骨结合
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Jun;27(3):287-94.
7
Regenerative therapy of deep peri-implant infrabony defects after CO2 laser implant surface decontamination.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2008 Jun;28(3):245-55.
8
The treatment of peri-implantitis 3.种植体周围炎的治疗3。
SADJ. 2008 Jul;63(6):360, 362.
9
Dental implants. Part II: Guided bone regeneration, immediate implant placement, peri-implantitis, failing implants.牙种植体。第二部分:引导骨再生、即刻种植、种植体周围炎、种植体失败
J N Z Soc Periodontol. 1994 Nov(78):18-28.
10
Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate extraction sockets: comparison of e-PTFE and a new titanium membrane.即刻拔牙窝内牙种植体周围引导组织再生:e-PTFE与新型钛膜的比较
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994 Jun;14(3):242-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Therapy by Using Bovine Bone Substitute with or without Hyaluronic Acid: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Pilot Study.使用含或不含透明质酸的牛骨替代物进行种植体周围炎重建治疗:一项随机临床对照试验研究
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Mar 8;14(3):149. doi: 10.3390/jfb14030149.
2
Laser Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review of Radiographic Outcomes.种植体周围炎的激光治疗:影像学结果的系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jan 28;10(2):20. doi: 10.3390/dj10020020.
3
Peri-Implantitis Regenerative Therapy: A Review.种植体周围炎再生治疗:综述
Biology (Basel). 2021 Aug 13;10(8):773. doi: 10.3390/biology10080773.
4
Focal Infection and Periodontitis: A Narrative Report and New Possible Approaches.局灶性感染与牙周炎:一篇叙述性报告及新的可能方法
Int J Microbiol. 2020 Oct 29;2020:8875612. doi: 10.1155/2020/8875612. eCollection 2020.
5
A clinical and radiographical comparison of buccolingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement.即刻种植与延期种植后颊舌侧牙槽嵴顶骨变化的临床与影像学比较
Med Pharm Rep. 2019 Oct;92(4):401-407. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1213. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
6
Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Protocols on with Different Combinations of Wavelengths and Photosensitizing Dyes.关于不同波长与光敏染料组合的抗菌光动力疗法方案
Bioengineering (Basel). 2019 May 10;6(2):42. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering6020042.
7
Evaluation of Effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy With Low-level Diode Laser in Nonsurgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis.低强度二极管激光光动力疗法在种植体周围炎非手术治疗中的疗效评估
J Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Summer;8(3):136-142. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2017.25. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
Efficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunctive to Mechanical Debridement in the Treatment of Peri-implant Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.抗菌光动力疗法作为机械清创辅助手段治疗种植体周围疾病的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验
J Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Summer;7(3):139-145. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.24. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
9
Clinical, Radiographic and Microbiological Evaluation of High Level Laser Therapy, a New Photodynamic Therapy Protocol, in Peri-Implantitis Treatment; a Pilot Experience.一种新型光动力疗法方案——高强度激光疗法治疗种植体周围炎的临床、影像学及微生物学评估:一项初步经验
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6321906. doi: 10.1155/2016/6321906. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
10
Erythritol-Enriched Air-Polishing Powder for the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis.富含赤藓糖醇的空气抛光粉用于种植体周围炎的外科治疗
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:802310. doi: 10.1155/2015/802310. Epub 2015 May 6.