Ector H, Emmerechts C, De Schepper S, De Geest H
Acta Cardiol. 1976;Suppl 21:85-95.
After this follow-up period some data seem important for the future: 1. Sudden failure never occurred for ventricular asynchronous units. Moreover battery survival time of fixed rate units is longer than that of ventricular-inhibited units. On the other hand, the use of fixed rate pacers avoids a number of demand function-related electrode difficulties. We must be aware of false signals generated by malfunctioning electrodes. 2. The reliability of a pacemaker clinic improves by replacing ventricular-inhibited units after 34 months. 3. Despite the additional work and cost we feel that photoanalysis is indispensable in today's pacemaker clinic.
在这段随访期之后，一些数据对未来似乎很重要：1. 心室非同步装置从未发生过突然故障。此外，固定频率装置的电池存活时间比心室抑制型装置更长。另一方面，使用固定频率起搏器可避免许多与按需功能相关的电极问题。我们必须意识到电极故障产生的错误信号。2. 在34个月后更换心室抑制型装置可提高起搏器诊所的可靠性。3. 尽管有额外的工作和成本，但我们认为在当今的起搏器诊所中，照片分析是必不可少的。
