Johansson U B, Adamson U C, Lins P E, Wredling R A
Department of Nursing, Division of Nursing Research at Karolinska Hospital, Karolinska, Institut, Stockholm, Sweden.
Diabetes Metab. 2000 May;26(3):192-6.
The aim of the study was to compare lispro (LP) and Insuman(R) (I) insulin in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy with respect to blood glucose control as expressed by the standard deviation of blood glucose (SD(BG) ) and HbA(1c) and to monitor the well-being (WBQ) and treatment satisfaction (DTSQ) parameters during such treatment. Forty-one IDDM patients who had used CSII for at least 6 months participated in an open-label, randomized, cross-over, multicenter study for 4 months (2 months LP and 2 months I or vice versa). Boluses with LP were given 5 min before each meal and with I 30 min before each meal. During LP administration compared with I, the SD(BG) of all blood glucose values (3.6 mmol/l vs. 3.9 mmol/l, p=0.012), as well as the SD(BG) of the postprandial, blood glucose values (3.6 mmol/l vs. 4.0 mmol/l, p=0.006), were significantly reduced. The HbA(1c) was significantly lower during LP administration (7.4% vs. 7.6%, p=0.047). The incidence of hypoglycemic events per 30 days (capillary blood glucose<3.0 mmol/l and/or symptoms) did not significantly differ between LP and I (9.7 vs. 8.0 per month, p=0.23). The total amount of daily insulin was slightly but significantly lower with LP, compared to I (38.0 IU vs. 40.3 IU, p=0.004). There was no treatment effects of LP compared to I concerning WBQ and DTSQ. It is concluded that in CSII therapy LP is superior to I with respect to the stability of blood glucose control, a lower HbA(1c), a less insulin requirement without increasing the frequency of hypoglycemia.
本研究的目的是比较赖脯胰岛素(LP)和人胰岛素(I)在持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)治疗中对血糖的控制情况,血糖控制情况通过血糖标准差(SD(BG))和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)来表示,并监测该治疗过程中的健康状况(WBQ)和治疗满意度(DTSQ)参数。41例使用CSII至少6个月的1型糖尿病患者参与了一项开放标签、随机、交叉、多中心研究,为期4个月(2个月使用LP,2个月使用I,或反之)。LP在每餐饭前5分钟注射,I在每餐饭前30分钟注射。与使用I相比,在使用LP期间,所有血糖值的SD(BG)(3.6 mmol/l对3.9 mmol/l,p = 0.012)以及餐后血糖值的SD(BG)(3.6 mmol/l对4.0 mmol/l,p = 0.006)均显著降低。使用LP期间HbA1c显著更低(7.4%对7.6%,p = 0.047)。LP和I每30天低血糖事件的发生率(毛细血管血糖<3.0 mmol/l和/或有症状)无显著差异(每月9.7次对8.0次,p = 0.23)。与I相比,LP的每日胰岛素总量略低但有显著差异(38.0 IU对40.3 IU,p = 0.004)。在WBQ和DTSQ方面,LP与I相比没有治疗效果差异。得出的结论是,在CSII治疗中,就血糖控制的稳定性、更低的HbA1c、更少的胰岛素需求且不增加低血糖发生频率而言,LP优于I。