Curry C A, Eng J, Horton K M, Urban B, Siegelman S, Kuszyk B S, Fishman E K
Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jul;175(1):99-103. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750099.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether CT can be used to distinguish serous cystadenomas from mucinous cystadenomas or cystadenocarcinomas of the pancreas and play an enhanced role in patient triage and treatment.
A blinded retrospective analysis of CT scans from 50 patients with pathologically proven primary cystic pancreatic neoplasms was performed independently by three radiologists. Using classic CT criteria as reported in the literature, each tumor was categorized as definitely serous, mucinous, or indeterminate. Tumor location, size, presence of calcification, and size of largest cyst were recorded. Data for each reviewer were analyzed independently. Consensus data were then subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis.
The ability of our reviewers to diagnose serous neoplasms ranged from 23% to 41%. Eight mucinous neoplasms were mistaken for serous tumors by two of the three reviewers. When consensus between at least two of the three reviewers was used for diagnosis, 27% of serous neoplasms were correctly diagnosed and all of the mucinous tumors were correctly identified as uncertain or mucinous, yielding the same clinical end point. For multivariate logistic regression analysis, a cyst smaller than 2 cm had a statistically significant association (p = 0.005) with serous tumors, and the presence of peripheral tumoral calcification had a statistically significant association (p = 0.01) with mucinous tumors.
There is significant variability in the CT appearance of serous and mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas, making CT an insensitive tool for differentiating these tumors. All tumors with peripheral calcifications were identified as mucinous neoplasms.
本研究旨在确定CT是否可用于区分胰腺浆液性囊腺瘤与黏液性囊腺瘤或囊腺癌,并在患者分诊和治疗中发挥更大作用。
由三位放射科医生对50例经病理证实的原发性胰腺囊性肿瘤患者的CT扫描进行盲法回顾性分析。根据文献报道的经典CT标准,将每个肿瘤分类为明确的浆液性、黏液性或不确定型。记录肿瘤位置、大小、钙化情况以及最大囊肿的大小。对每位审阅者的数据进行独立分析。然后对共识数据进行多因素逻辑回归分析。
审阅者诊断浆液性肿瘤的能力在23%至41%之间。8例黏液性肿瘤被三位审阅者中的两位误诊为浆液性肿瘤。当以三位审阅者中至少两位的共识进行诊断时,27%的浆液性肿瘤被正确诊断,所有黏液性肿瘤均被正确识别为不确定或黏液性,得出相同的临床终点。对于多因素逻辑回归分析,小于2 cm的囊肿与浆液性肿瘤有统计学显著关联(p = 0.005),肿瘤外周钙化与黏液性肿瘤有统计学显著关联(p = 0.01)。
胰腺浆液性和黏液性肿瘤的CT表现存在显著差异,使得CT成为区分这些肿瘤的不敏感工具。所有有外周钙化的肿瘤均被识别为黏液性肿瘤。