Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查期间的清醒镇静及心肺安全性

Conscious sedation and cardiorespiratory safety during colonoscopy.

作者信息

Ristikankare M, Julkunen R, Mattila M, Laitinen T, Wang S X, Heikkinen M, Janatuinen E, Hartikainen J

机构信息

Departments of Medicine, Research, and Clinical Physiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Jul;52(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.105982.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiorespiratory events during colonoscopy are common. The effect of sedative premedication on cardiorespiratory parameters during colonoscopy has not been studied in controlled, prospective trials.

METHODS

One hundred eighty patients undergoing colonoscopy were divided into 3 groups: (1) sedation with intravenous midazolam (midazolam group); (2) sedation with intravenous saline (placebo group); and (3) no intravenous cannula (control group). Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), systolic and diastolic blood pressure and continuous electrocardiogram were recorded prior to, during and after the endoscopic procedure.

RESULTS

Midazolam produced lower SaO(2) values during colonoscopy compared with placebo or control groups (p < 0.001, repeated measures analysis of variance). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure during colonoscopy were lower in the midazolam group than in the placebo group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), but no difference was found between the midazolam and the control groups. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg) occurred more frequently in the midazolam group (19%) than in the placebo (3%; p < 0.01) or control groups (7%; p < 0.05). ST-segment depression developed in 7% of patients during the recording with no difference between the groups. In 75% of cases ST-depression appeared prior to the endoscopic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Premedication with midazolam induced a statistically significant decrease in arterial oxygen saturation and increased the risk for hypotension. However, colonoscopy proved to be a safe procedure both with and without sedation.

摘要

背景

结肠镜检查期间的心肺事件很常见。在对照的前瞻性试验中,尚未研究镇静预处理对结肠镜检查期间心肺参数的影响。

方法

180例接受结肠镜检查的患者分为3组:(1)静脉注射咪达唑仑镇静(咪达唑仑组);(2)静脉注射生理盐水镇静(安慰剂组);(3)无静脉插管(对照组)。在内镜检查前、检查期间和检查后记录动脉血氧饱和度(SaO₂)、收缩压和舒张压以及连续心电图。

结果

与安慰剂组或对照组相比,咪达唑仑在结肠镜检查期间导致较低的SaO₂值(p < 0.001,重复测量方差分析)。结肠镜检查期间,咪达唑仑组的收缩压和舒张压低于安慰剂组(分别为p < 0.01和p < 0.05),但咪达唑仑组与对照组之间未发现差异。低血压(收缩压低于100 mmHg)在咪达唑仑组(19%)中比在安慰剂组(3%;p < 0.01)或对照组(7%;p < 0.05)中更频繁地发生。7%的患者在记录期间出现ST段压低,各组之间无差异。在75%的病例中,ST段压低出现在内镜检查之前。

结论

咪达唑仑预处理导致动脉血氧饱和度有统计学意义的下降,并增加了低血压风险。然而,无论有无镇静,结肠镜检查都被证明是一种安全的操作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验