Suppr超能文献

关节镜冲洗清创术治疗感染性全膝关节置换术

Infected total knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopic irrigation and débridement.

作者信息

Waldman B J, Hostin E, Mont M A, Hungerford D S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jun;15(4):430-6. doi: 10.1054/arth.2000.4637.

Abstract

Sixteen patients with infected total knee arthroplasties (4 postoperative and 12 late hematogenous) were treated by arthroscopic irrigation and débridement. All patients had < or = 7 days of knee symptoms, and there were no radiographic signs of osteitis or prosthetic loosening. Six of the 16 original total knee arthroplasties (38%) did not need prosthesis removal at a mean follow-up of 64 months (range, 36-151 months). Ten other knees were treated with irrigation, débridement, and hardware removal within 7 weeks of the latest procedure used to try to retain components. Two (13%) of these cases ultimately required an arthrodesis for persistent infection. Although we still believe that this method is preferable to resorting immediately to implant removal for acute infections, arthroscopic débridement was less efficacious for most situations when compared with open treatment. We would use arthroscopic irrigation and débridement only under selected circumstances (medically unstable or anticoagulated patients).

摘要

16例感染性全膝关节置换患者(4例术后感染,12例晚期血源性感染)接受了关节镜冲洗和清创治疗。所有患者膝关节症状均≤7天,且无骨炎或假体松动的影像学表现。16例初次全膝关节置换患者中有6例(38%)在平均64个月(范围36 - 151个月)的随访中无需取出假体。另外10例膝关节在用于尝试保留假体部件的最新手术后7周内接受了冲洗、清创和取出内固定装置的治疗。其中2例(13%)最终因持续感染而行关节融合术。尽管我们仍然认为这种方法比急性感染时立即取出植入物更为可取,但与开放治疗相比,关节镜清创在大多数情况下效果较差。我们仅在特定情况下(内科情况不稳定或正在抗凝治疗的患者)才会使用关节镜冲洗和清创。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验