Avins A L, Neuhaus J M
General Internal Medicine Section (111-A1), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement St, San Francisco, CA 94121.
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Jul 10;160(13):1937-44. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.13.1937.
Prior research suggests that adding triglyceride determinations to measurements of total cholesterol and cholesterol subfractions may improve the prediction of coronary heart disease (CHD).
To determine the additional value of measuring triglyceride levels, in addition to cholesterol levels and subfractions, for predicting CHD.
A set of secondary analyses of previously reported studies.
We performed secondary analyses of data from the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial, the Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial, and the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence and Mortality Follow-Up Study. Predictor variables included the levels of fasting triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose; age; blood pressure; cigarette smoking; body mass index; and postmenopausal estrogen use. Analytic methods included Cox proportional hazards models, calculation of stratified crude incidence rates, and measurement of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Outcome variables were fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarctions.
With few exceptions, no significant interactions between cholesterol subfractions and triglyceride levels were found and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that triglyceride measurements did not improve discrimination between those subjects who did and did not suffer CHD events. In men, categorical analyses employing both triglyceride and cholesterol levels were similar to those using cholesterol categories alone. In the one study of women, those subjects with both a high-risk cholesterol profile and high triglyceride levels were more likely to have a CHD event, though this finding was based on fewer subjects and CHD events.
These data suggest that, in men, measurement of serum triglyceride levels does not provide clinically meaningful information about CHD risk beyond that obtainable by measurement of serum cholesterol subfractions alone.
先前的研究表明,在总胆固醇和胆固醇亚组分测量中加入甘油三酯测定可能会改善对冠心病(CHD)的预测。
确定除胆固醇水平和亚组分外,测量甘油三酯水平对预测冠心病的附加价值。
对先前报道的研究进行一组二次分析。
我们对多重危险因素干预试验、脂质研究临床冠心病一级预防试验以及脂质研究临床患病率和死亡率随访研究的数据进行了二次分析。预测变量包括空腹甘油三酯、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和空腹血糖水平;年龄;血压;吸烟;体重指数;以及绝经后雌激素使用情况。分析方法包括Cox比例风险模型、分层粗发病率计算以及受试者操作特征曲线下面积测量。
结局变量为致命性和非致命性心肌梗死。
除少数例外情况外,未发现胆固醇亚组分与甘油三酯水平之间存在显著相互作用,受试者操作特征曲线分析显示,甘油三酯测量并未改善对发生和未发生冠心病事件的受试者之间的区分能力。在男性中,同时使用甘油三酯和胆固醇水平的分类分析与仅使用胆固醇分类的分析相似。在一项针对女性的研究中,那些具有高风险胆固醇谱且甘油三酯水平高的受试者更有可能发生冠心病事件,尽管这一发现基于较少的受试者和冠心病事件。
这些数据表明,在男性中,测量血清甘油三酯水平并不能提供超出仅测量血清胆固醇亚组分所能获得的关于冠心病风险的临床有意义信息。