Suppr超能文献

经前评估表作为经前烦躁障碍诊断辅助工具的临床效用。

Clinical utility of the premenstrual assessment form as an instrument auxiliary to the diagnosis of premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

作者信息

Nogueira Pires M L, Calil H M

机构信息

Departamento de Psicobiologia, UNIFESP, Rua Botucatu 862, 1. andar, 04023-062, SP, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2000 Jul 17;94(3):211-9. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00151-7.

Abstract

The Premenstrual Assessment Form (PAF) is a retrospective self-report questionnaire, yielding classification into syndromal categories and severity assessment (unipolar summary scales) of behavioral, psychological and physical premenstrual changes. However, the PAF has been criticized due to an overlap of its syndromal categories and the unipolar summary scores from symptomatic and asymptomatic women. PAF data from women seeking treatment for premenstrual symptoms and meeting a provisional diagnosis of premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD; n=30) were compared to a control group (n=16). Results showed that 97% of the symptomatic group met the PAF depressive premenstrual syndrome criteria vs. only 12% of the control subjects (chi(2)=29.9, P<0.001). The symptomatic group also reported more severe premenstrual symptoms in all unipolar scales than the control subjects. Sixteen symptomatic women completed two menstrual cycles of prospective daily ratings, and half of them had their provisional diagnosis of PMDD confirmed. There were no significant differences in the scores of the PAF unipolar summary scales between the subgroups with or without the diagnosis confirmation. Most of the PAF scales displayed high sensitivity, but low specificity. These findings suggest that the PAF can be useful to differentiate clinical population and control samples, but it does not provide information to make a more definite diagnosis of PMDD.

摘要

经前评估表(PAF)是一种回顾性自我报告问卷,可对经前行为、心理和身体变化进行综合征分类及严重程度评估(单极汇总量表)。然而,PAF因综合征类别与有症状和无症状女性的单极汇总评分存在重叠而受到批评。将寻求经前症状治疗且初步诊断为经前烦躁障碍(PMDD;n = 30)的女性的PAF数据与对照组(n = 16)进行比较。结果显示,97%的有症状组符合PAF经前抑郁综合征标准,而对照组仅12%符合(χ(2)=29.9,P<0.001)。有症状组在所有单极量表中报告的经前症状也比对照组更严重。16名有症状女性完成了两个月经周期的前瞻性每日评分,其中一半人的PMDD初步诊断得到确认。诊断得到确认和未得到确认的亚组之间,PAF单极汇总量表的得分无显著差异。PAF的大多数量表显示出高敏感性,但特异性较低。这些发现表明,PAF有助于区分临床人群和对照样本,但它无法提供信息以做出更明确的PMDD诊断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验