Suppr超能文献

[白内障手术后给予3种不同粘弹剂后的眼压反应]

[Intraocular pressure response after administration of 3 different viscoelastic agents after cataract operation].

作者信息

Lüchtenberg M, Lüchtenberg C, Lang M, Badachschi N, Emmerich K H

机构信息

Universitäts-Augenklinik Frankfurt/Main.

出版信息

Ophthalmologe. 2000 May;97(5):331-5. doi: 10.1007/s003470050532.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

By using three different viscoelastics [Adatocel (methylhydroxypropylcellulose), Amvisc Plus (sodium hyaluronate) and Healon (sodium hyaluronate)] a prospective randomized study was conducted to investigate whether postoperative intraocular pressure shows significant differences according to the viscoelastics used after 150 cases of cataract surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The inclusion criteria for this study were: extracapsular cataract extraction via the usual small-incision techniques and endocapsular posterior-chamber lens implantation. A total of 150 eyes were operated upon. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups according to the viscoelastics, 50 cases used adatocel, 50 Amvisc Plus and 50 Healon. As far as possible, the viscoelastics were sucked out under visual control. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured after 6 and 24 h.

RESULTS

Six hours postoperatively, no statistically significant difference between the intraocular pressure after using different viscoelastics (adatocel: 19.6 +/- 9.7 mmHg, Amvisc Plus: 20.5 +/- 9.6 mmHg und Healon: 21.8 +/- 8.8 mmHg) was seen. At 24 h IOP was statistically significant higher for Healon than for adatocel and Amvisc Plus (adatocel: 16.3 +/- 4.8 mmHg, Amvisc Plus: 16.5 +/- 4.6 mmHg and Healon: 19.7 +/- 6.6 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Six hours postoperatively after phacoemulsification there was no significant difference between the IOP using different viscoelastics adatocel, Amvisc Plus and Healon. Twenty-four hours postoperatively a significantly higher intraocular pressure was measured for Healon than for the other viscoelastics.

摘要

未标注

通过使用三种不同的粘弹性物质[Adatocel(甲基羟丙基纤维素)、Amvisc Plus(透明质酸钠)和Healon(透明质酸钠)],进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以调查150例白内障手术后,根据所使用的粘弹性物质,术后眼压是否存在显著差异。

患者与方法

本研究的纳入标准为:采用常规小切口技术进行白内障囊外摘除术和囊内后房型人工晶状体植入术。共对150只眼进行了手术。根据粘弹性物质将患者随机分为三组,50例使用Adatocel,50例使用Amvisc Plus,50例使用Healon。尽可能在视觉控制下吸出粘弹性物质。术后6小时和24小时测量眼压。

结果

术后6小时,使用不同粘弹性物质后的眼压之间无统计学显著差异(Adatocel:19.6±9.7 mmHg,Amvisc Plus:20.5±9.6 mmHg,Healon:21.8±8.8 mmHg)。在24小时时,Healon组的眼压在统计学上显著高于Adatocel组和Amvisc Plus组(Adatocel:16.3±4.8 mmHg,Amvisc Plus:16.5±4.6 mmHg,Healon:19.7±6.6 mmHg)。

结论

超声乳化术后6小时,使用不同粘弹性物质Adatocel、Amvisc Plus和Healon后的眼压无显著差异。术后24小时,Healon组的眼压测量值显著高于其他粘弹性物质组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验