• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本成年人软组织头影测量标准。

Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults.

作者信息

Alcalde R E, Jinno T, Orsini M G, Sasaki A, Sugiyama R M, Matsumura T

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jul;118(1):84-9. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.104411.

DOI:10.1067/mod.2000.104411
PMID:10893477
Abstract

Lateral soft tissue cephalometric standards of Japanese normal adults were developed with the use of Ricketts, Epker, Holdaway, and Legan cephalometric analyses. Cephalometric radiographs of 211 Japanese normal adults were analyzed, and the soft tissue measurements were compared with those of an esthetically pleasant Japanese subgroup and white adult sample. Statistically significant differences were found in the Japanese sample when compared with the white norms. On the other hand, the soft tissue mean values of the Japanese supernormal group were similar to the white norms, with the exception of the nasolabial angle and the lip prominence. Soft tissue cephalometric norms are specific for ethnic groups, but these values should not be interpreted as treatment goals. Normative data represent an aid for the diagnosis and planning of orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery.

摘要

利用里克茨、埃克、霍尔迪威和莱根头影测量分析法制定了日本正常成年人的侧位软组织头影测量标准。对211名日本正常成年人的头影测量X线片进行了分析,并将软组织测量结果与一个具有美观效果的日本亚组以及白人成年人样本的测量结果进行了比较。与白人标准相比,在日本样本中发现了具有统计学意义的差异。另一方面,日本超常组的软组织平均值与白人标准相似,但鼻唇角和唇部突度除外。软组织头影测量标准因种族而异,但这些数值不应被解释为治疗目标。规范性数据有助于正畸治疗和正颌外科手术的诊断与规划。

相似文献

1
Soft tissue cephalometric norms in Japanese adults.日本成年人软组织头影测量标准。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jul;118(1):84-9. doi: 10.1067/mod.2000.104411.
2
Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults.日本成年人的头影测量标准。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Feb;56(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(98)90849-7.
3
Soft tissue cephalometric norms for orthognathic and cosmetic surgery.正颌外科手术和美容手术的软组织头影测量标准。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;71(1):e24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.015. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
4
Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles.具有美观面部轮廓的中国成年人软组织头影测量标准。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Nov;50(11):1184-9; discussion 1189-90. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90151-o.
5
Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Yemeni men.也门男性的软组织头影测量标准。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Nov;132(5):576.e7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.018.
6
A cephalometric investigation of horizontal lip position in adult Nigerians.成年尼日利亚人水平唇部位置的头影测量研究。
J Orthod. 2012 Sep;39(3):160-9. doi: 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000026.
7
Comparison of cephalometric norms between Japanese and Caucasian adults in antero-posterior and vertical dimension.日本成年人与高加索成年人在前后径和垂直径方面的头影测量标准比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):493-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm059.
8
[Cephalometric analysis of the soft tissue profile in Hunan Han adults with normal occlusion].[湖南汉族正常牙合成年人软组织侧貌的头影测量分析]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Apr;40(4):398-405. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.04.010.
9
Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables.伊朗人的前后位和垂直位软组织头影测量标准、种族间比较、性别差异以及年龄对头影测量变量的影响。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;23(2):167-178. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00755-4. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
10
Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profiles of Turkish and European-American young adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.正常牙合、面型均衡的土耳其和欧洲裔美国青年成年人软组织侧貌的种族差异。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Jun;34(3):296-301. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq165. Epub 2011 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Chin soft tissue thickness and mandibular divergency: a cross-sectional study.颏部软组织厚度与下颌骨偏斜度:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 2;30(1):699. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02957-x.
2
Association of LSMx and LIMd Angles With Cephalometric Dental and Soft Tissue Parameters of Incisor Proclination and Lip Protrusion.LSMx角和LIMd角与切牙倾斜和唇前突的头影测量牙齿及软组织参数的相关性
Cureus. 2024 Aug 25;16(8):e67761. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67761. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Do We Vary from Caucasians! Cephalometric Analysis for Orthognathic Surgery in Chhattisgarhi Population.
我们与高加索人有差异吗?恰蒂斯加尔人群正颌外科手术的头影测量分析。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Dec;21(4):1237-1243. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01559-4. Epub 2021 Apr 11.
4
Anteroposterior and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians, interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect of age on cephalometric variables.伊朗人的前后位和垂直位软组织头影测量标准、种族间比较、性别差异以及年龄对头影测量变量的影响。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;23(2):167-178. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00755-4. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
5
Lateral cephalometric analysis of the nasal morphology among Saudi adults.沙特成年人鼻腔形态的侧位头影测量分析
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2019 Jan 15;11:9-17. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S190230. eCollection 2019.
6
Comparison of cephalometric variables between adult Spanish and Japanese women with Class I malocclusion.成年西班牙和日本I类错牙合女性头影测量变量的比较。
J Orthod Sci. 2018 Sep 6;7:19. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_66_18. eCollection 2018.
7
Legan-burstone soft tissue profile values in a Circassian adult sample.切尔克斯成年样本中的莱根-伯斯通软组织侧貌值。
J Orthod Sci. 2018 Sep 6;7:18. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_27_18. eCollection 2018.
8
Evaluation of Nasal Proportions in Adults with Class I and Class II Skeletal Patterns: A Cephalometric Study.I类和II类骨骼型成人鼻比例的评估:一项头影测量研究。
J Orthod Sci. 2017 Apr-Jun;6(2):41-46. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.205453.
9
Effect of frontal facial type and sex on preferred chin projection.面部正面类型和性别对理想下巴突出度的影响。
Korean J Orthod. 2017 Mar;47(2):108-117. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.108. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
10
Cephalometric norms and esthetic profile preference for the Japanese: a systematic review.日本人的头影测量标准和审美轮廓偏好:一项系统评价。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Nov-Dec;20(6):43-51. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.043-051.oar.