Obstetric interventions among private and public patients. High rates of operative vaginal interventions in private patients need analysis.
作者信息
King J F
出版信息
BMJ. 2000 Jul 15;321(7254):125-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7254.125.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Obstetric interventions among private and public patients. High rates of operative vaginal interventions in private patients need analysis.私立和公立患者的产科干预措施。私立患者中手术阴道干预的高发生率需要分析。
BMJ. 2000 Jul 15;321(7254):125-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7254.125.
2
Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study.澳大利亚私立和公立患者的产科干预率：基于人群的描述性研究。
BMJ. 2000 Jul 15;321(7254):137-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7254.137.
3
Private health care coverage and increased risk of obstetric intervention.私人医疗保险与产科干预风险增加
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 13;14:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-13.
4
Outcome of attempted vaginal delivery after a previous vacuum extraction: a population-based study.既往真空吸引术后尝试经阴道分娩的结局：一项基于人群的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Mar;95(3):362-7. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12824. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
5
Impact of maternity care policy in Catalonia: a retrospective cross-sectional study of service delivery in public and private hospitals.加泰罗尼亚地区孕产妇护理政策的影响：一项关于公立和私立医院服务提供情况的回顾性横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 13;15:23. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0446-y.
6
BirthStats: rates of cesarean delivery, and unassisted and assisted vaginal delivery, United States, 1996, 2000, and 2006.出生统计数据：美国1996年、2000年和2006年的剖宫产率、自然阴道分娩率和辅助阴道分娩率。
Birth. 2009 Jun;36(2):167. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00317.x.
7
Vaginal operative deliveries in Italy.意大利的阴道手术分娩
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Oct;73(9):698-700. doi: 10.3109/00016349409029406.
8
International differences in the use of obstetric interventions.产科干预措施使用方面的国际差异。
JAMA. 1990 Jun 27;263(24):3286-91.
9
Level of birth care and operative delivery rates.分娩护理水平和手术分娩率。
BJOG. 2012 Feb;119(3):377; author reply 377-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03208.x.
10
Outcome of the next labour in women who had a vaginal delivery in their first pregnancy.首次妊娠经阴道分娩的女性下次分娩的结局
BJOG. 2000 Jul;107(7):932-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11094.x.
引用本文的文献
1
Frequency and determinants of misuse of augmentation of labor in France: A population-based study.法国产程干预滥用的频率及其决定因素：一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 9;16(2):e0246729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246729. eCollection 2021.
2
Do you pay to go private?: a single centre comparison of induction of labour and caesarean section rates in private versus public patients.你是否付费选择私立医院服务？：一项单中心研究比较了私立患者与公立患者的引产和剖宫产率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03443-4.
3
Caesarean Section rate amongst Obstetricians at a tertiary-care hospital of Karachi.卡拉奇一家三级护理医院产科医生的剖宫产率。
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):553-557. doi: 10.12669/pjms.343.14722.
本文引用的文献
1
Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study.澳大利亚私立和公立患者的产科干预率：基于人群的描述性研究。
BMJ. 2000 Jul 15;321(7254):137-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7254.137.
2
Recent advances: obstetrics.最新进展：产科学
BMJ. 2000 Jul 1;321(7252):33-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7252.33.
3
Caesarean section controversy. Women choose caesarean section.剖宫产争议。女性选择剖宫产。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1073; author reply 1074.
4
Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.用于辅助阴道分娩的真空吸引术与产钳术比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000224.
5
The pelvic floor sequelae of childbirth.分娩的盆底后遗症。
Br J Hosp Med. 1996;55(9):575-9.
Zotero 插件