• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《专家共识指南系列:双相情感障碍的药物治疗(2000年版)》

The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: Medication Treatment of Bipolar Disorder 2000.

作者信息

Sachs G S, Printz D J, Kahn D A, Carpenter D, Docherty J P

机构信息

Partners Bipolar Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA.

出版信息

Postgrad Med. 2000 Apr;Spec No:1-104.

PMID:10895797
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

New treatments for bipolar disorder have been reported since we first published survey-based expert consensus guidelines in 1996. The evidence for these treatments varies widely; data are especially limited regarding comparisons between treatments and how to sequence them. We therefore undertook a new survey of expert opinion in order to bridge gaps between the research evidence and key clinical decisions.

METHOD

Based on a literature review, a written survey was prepared which asked about 1,276 options for psychopharmacologic interventions in 48 specific clinical situations. Most options were scored using a modified version of the RAND Corporation 9-point scale for rating appropriateness of medical decisions. We contacted 65 national experts, 58 of whom (89%) completed the survey. Consensus on each option was defined as a non-random distribution of scores by chi-square test. We assigned a categorical rank (first-line/preferred choice, second-line/alternate choice, third-line/usually inappropriate) to each option based on the confidence interval of its mean rating. Guideline tables indicating preferred treatment strategies were then developed for key clinical situations.

RESULTS

The expert panel reached consensus on many key strategies, including acute and preventive treatment for mania (euphoric, mixed, and dysphoric subtypes), depression, and rapid cycling, and approaches to managing the complications of treatment resistance and comorbidity. Use of a mood stabilizer is recommended in all phases of treatment. Divalproex (especially for mixed or dysphoric subtypes) and lithium are the cornerstone choices among this class for both acute and preventive treatment of mania. Regardless of which is selected first, if monotherapy fails, the next recommended intervention is to use these agents in combination. The combination can then serve as the foundation on which other medications are added, if needed. Carbamazepine is the leading alternative mood stabilizer for mania. Expert opinion regards other new anticonvulsants as second-line options (e.g., if the previously mentioned mood stabilizers fail or are contraindicated). For milder depression, a mood stabilizer, especially lithium, may be used as monotherapy. Divalproex and lamotrigine are other first-line choices. For more severe depression, a standard antidepressant should be combined with lithium or divalproex. Bupropion, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and venlafaxine are preferred antidepressants, and should be tapered 2 to 6 months after remission. Divalproex monotherapy is recommended for initial treatment of either depression or mania with rapid cycling. Antipsychotics are recommended for use with the above regimens for mania or depression with psychosis, and as potential adjuncts in non-psychotic episodes. Atypical antipsychotics, especially olanzapine and risperidone, were generally preferred over conventional antipsychotics. Recommendations are also given concerning the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), clozapine, thyroid hormone, stimulants, and various novel agents for patients with treatment-refractory illness.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts reached high levels of consensus on key steps in treating bipolar disorder despite obvious gaps in high-quality data. To evaluate many of the treatment options in this survey, the experts had to extrapolate beyond controlled data; however, their recommendations are generally conservative. Experts reserve strongest support for initial strategies and individual medications for which there are high-quality research data, or for which there are longstanding patterns of clinical usage. Within the limits of expert opinion and with the understanding that new research data may take precedence, these guidelines provide clear pathways for addressing common clinical questions in a manner that can be used to inform clinicians and educate patients regarding the relative merits of a variety of interventions.

摘要

目的

自我们于1996年首次发布基于调查的专家共识指南以来,已有关于双相情感障碍的新治疗方法的报道。这些治疗方法的证据差异很大;关于治疗之间的比较以及如何安排治疗顺序的数据尤其有限。因此,我们进行了一项新的专家意见调查,以弥合研究证据与关键临床决策之间的差距。

方法

基于文献综述,编制了一份书面调查问卷,询问了48种特定临床情况下1276种精神药物干预选项。大多数选项使用兰德公司用于评估医疗决策适宜性的9分制的修改版本进行评分。我们联系了65位国内专家,其中58位(89%)完成了调查。通过卡方检验将每个选项的共识定义为分数的非随机分布。根据每个选项平均评分的置信区间,为其分配一个分类等级(一线/首选、二线/替代选择、三线/通常不合适)。然后针对关键临床情况制定了表明首选治疗策略的指南表。

结果

专家小组就许多关键策略达成了共识,包括躁狂(欣快、混合和烦躁亚型)、抑郁和快速循环的急性和预防性治疗,以及处理治疗抵抗和共病并发症的方法。在治疗的所有阶段都建议使用心境稳定剂。丙戊酸(尤其是用于混合或烦躁亚型)和锂盐是这一类药物中用于躁狂急性和预防性治疗的基石选择。无论首先选择哪种药物,如果单一疗法失败,接下来推荐的干预措施是联合使用这些药物。然后,如果需要,这种联合用药可作为添加其他药物的基础。卡马西平是治疗躁狂的主要替代心境稳定剂。专家意见认为其他新型抗惊厥药为二线选择(例如,如果上述心境稳定剂失败或禁忌)。对于较轻的抑郁,一种心境稳定剂,尤其是锂盐,可作为单一疗法使用。丙戊酸和拉莫三嗪是其他一线选择。对于更严重的抑郁,应将标准抗抑郁药与锂盐或丙戊酸联合使用。安非他酮、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和文拉法辛是首选的抗抑郁药,缓解后应在2至6个月内逐渐减量。对于快速循环型抑郁或躁狂的初始治疗,建议使用丙戊酸单一疗法。对于伴有精神病性症状的躁狂或抑郁,建议将抗精神病药物与上述方案联合使用,并作为非精神病性发作的潜在辅助药物。非典型抗精神病药物,尤其是奥氮平和利培酮,通常比传统抗精神病药物更受青睐。还给出了关于难治性疾病患者使用电休克治疗(ECT)、氯氮平、甲状腺激素、兴奋剂和各种新型药物的建议。

结论

尽管高质量数据存在明显差距,但专家们在双相情感障碍治疗的关键步骤上达成了高度共识。为了评估本次调查中的许多治疗选项,专家们不得不超越对照数据进行推断;然而,他们的建议通常较为保守。专家们对有高质量研究数据或有长期临床使用模式的初始策略和个别药物给予了最有力的支持。在专家意见的范围内,并理解新的研究数据可能具有优先性,这些指南以一种可用于告知临床医生并教育患者各种干预措施相对优点的方式,为解决常见临床问题提供了明确的途径。

相似文献

1
The Expert Consensus Guideline Series: Medication Treatment of Bipolar Disorder 2000.《专家共识指南系列:双相情感障碍的药物治疗(2000年版)》
Postgrad Med. 2000 Apr;Spec No:1-104.
2
Using antipsychotic agents in older patients.在老年患者中使用抗精神病药物。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65 Suppl 2:5-99; discussion 100-102; quiz 103-4.
3
The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary.专家共识指南系列。优化精神障碍的药物治疗。引言:方法、评论与总结。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 Suppl 12:5-19.
4
Medication treatment of bipolar disorder 2000: a summary of the expert consensus guidelines.2000年双相情感障碍的药物治疗:专家共识指南摘要
J Psychiatr Pract. 2000 Jul;6(4):197-211. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200007000-00004.
5
The expert consensus guideline series. Treatment of dementia and its behavioral disturbances. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary.专家共识指南系列。痴呆及其行为障碍的治疗。引言:方法、评论与总结。
Postgrad Med. 2005 Jan;Spec No:6-22.
6
The Expert Consensus Guideline Series. Treatment of behavioral emergencies.专家共识指南系列。行为紧急情况的治疗。
Postgrad Med. 2001 May(Spec No):1-88; quiz 89-90.
7
Treatment of pediatric epilepsy: European expert opinion, 2007.儿童癫痫的治疗:欧洲专家意见,2007年
Epileptic Disord. 2007 Dec;9(4):353-412. doi: 10.1684/epd.2007.0144.
8
Treatments for late-life bipolar disorder.老年双相情感障碍的治疗方法。
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Dec;4(4):347-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2006.12.007.
9
Alternative approaches to refractory depression in bipolar illness.双相情感障碍难治性抑郁的替代治疗方法。
Depress Anxiety. 1997;5(4):175-89.
10
The expert consensus guideline series. Treatment of behavioral emergencies 2005.专家共识指南系列。2005年行为紧急情况的治疗
J Psychiatr Pract. 2005 Nov;11 Suppl 1:5-108; quiz 110-2. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200511001-00002.

引用本文的文献

1
Thyrotropin levels in first-episode bipolar disorder and their association with clinical phenotypes: systematic review and meta-analysis.首发双相情感障碍患者的促甲状腺激素水平及其与临床表型的关联:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 14;16:1580854. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1580854. eCollection 2025.
2
Challenges in defining treatment-resistant mania in adults: A systematic review.成人治疗抵抗性躁狂定义中的挑战:系统评价。
Bipolar Disord. 2024 Feb;26(1):7-21. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13383. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
The Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder (KMAP-DD): Changes in Preferred Treatment Strategies and Medications over 20 Years and Five Editions.
韩国抑郁症药物治疗算法项目(KMAP-DD):20年及五个版本中首选治疗策略和药物的变化
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 1;12(3):1146. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031146.
4
Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2022: Comparisons with Other Treatment Guidelines.2022年韩国双相情感障碍药物治疗算法项目:与其他治疗指南的比较
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2023 Feb 28;21(1):32-48. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2023.21.1.32.
5
Effect of valproate and lithium on dementia onset risk in bipolar disorder patients.丙戊酸盐和锂对双相障碍患者痴呆发病风险的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 19;12(1):14142. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18350-1.
6
The Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder 2021: Comparisons with Other Treatment Guidelines.《2021年韩国抑郁症药物治疗算法项目:与其他治疗指南的比较》
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2022 Feb 28;20(1):37-50. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2022.20.1.37.
7
Korean Medication Algorithm for Depressive Disorder 2021, Fourth Revision: An Executive Summary.《2021年韩国抑郁症药物治疗算法,第四次修订版:执行摘要》
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2021 Nov 30;19(4):751-772. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2021.19.4.751.
8
Efficacy and safety of lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar disorder across the lifespan: a systematic review.拉莫三嗪在全生命周期双相情感障碍治疗中的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2021 Oct 8;11:20451253211045870. doi: 10.1177/20451253211045870. eCollection 2021.
9
Lithium orotate: A superior option for lithium therapy?L- 羟赖氨酸:锂治疗的更佳选择?
Brain Behav. 2021 Aug;11(8):e2262. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2262. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
10
A brief online intervention to address aggression in the context of emotion-related impulsivity for those treated for bipolar disorder: Feasibility, acceptability and pilot outcome data.针对双相情感障碍患者在与情绪相关的冲动情境下的攻击行为的简短在线干预:可行性、可接受性及试点结果数据。
J Behav Cogn Ther. 2020 Apr;30(1):65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jbct.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Jul 17.