Sachs G S, Printz D J, Kahn D A, Carpenter D, Docherty J P
Partners Bipolar Treatment Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Postgrad Med. 2000 Apr;Spec No:1-104.
New treatments for bipolar disorder have been reported since we first published survey-based expert consensus guidelines in 1996. The evidence for these treatments varies widely; data are especially limited regarding comparisons between treatments and how to sequence them. We therefore undertook a new survey of expert opinion in order to bridge gaps between the research evidence and key clinical decisions.
Based on a literature review, a written survey was prepared which asked about 1,276 options for psychopharmacologic interventions in 48 specific clinical situations. Most options were scored using a modified version of the RAND Corporation 9-point scale for rating appropriateness of medical decisions. We contacted 65 national experts, 58 of whom (89%) completed the survey. Consensus on each option was defined as a non-random distribution of scores by chi-square test. We assigned a categorical rank (first-line/preferred choice, second-line/alternate choice, third-line/usually inappropriate) to each option based on the confidence interval of its mean rating. Guideline tables indicating preferred treatment strategies were then developed for key clinical situations.
The expert panel reached consensus on many key strategies, including acute and preventive treatment for mania (euphoric, mixed, and dysphoric subtypes), depression, and rapid cycling, and approaches to managing the complications of treatment resistance and comorbidity. Use of a mood stabilizer is recommended in all phases of treatment. Divalproex (especially for mixed or dysphoric subtypes) and lithium are the cornerstone choices among this class for both acute and preventive treatment of mania. Regardless of which is selected first, if monotherapy fails, the next recommended intervention is to use these agents in combination. The combination can then serve as the foundation on which other medications are added, if needed. Carbamazepine is the leading alternative mood stabilizer for mania. Expert opinion regards other new anticonvulsants as second-line options (e.g., if the previously mentioned mood stabilizers fail or are contraindicated). For milder depression, a mood stabilizer, especially lithium, may be used as monotherapy. Divalproex and lamotrigine are other first-line choices. For more severe depression, a standard antidepressant should be combined with lithium or divalproex. Bupropion, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and venlafaxine are preferred antidepressants, and should be tapered 2 to 6 months after remission. Divalproex monotherapy is recommended for initial treatment of either depression or mania with rapid cycling. Antipsychotics are recommended for use with the above regimens for mania or depression with psychosis, and as potential adjuncts in non-psychotic episodes. Atypical antipsychotics, especially olanzapine and risperidone, were generally preferred over conventional antipsychotics. Recommendations are also given concerning the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), clozapine, thyroid hormone, stimulants, and various novel agents for patients with treatment-refractory illness.
The experts reached high levels of consensus on key steps in treating bipolar disorder despite obvious gaps in high-quality data. To evaluate many of the treatment options in this survey, the experts had to extrapolate beyond controlled data; however, their recommendations are generally conservative. Experts reserve strongest support for initial strategies and individual medications for which there are high-quality research data, or for which there are longstanding patterns of clinical usage. Within the limits of expert opinion and with the understanding that new research data may take precedence, these guidelines provide clear pathways for addressing common clinical questions in a manner that can be used to inform clinicians and educate patients regarding the relative merits of a variety of interventions.
自我们于1996年首次发布基于调查的专家共识指南以来,已有关于双相情感障碍的新治疗方法的报道。这些治疗方法的证据差异很大;关于治疗之间的比较以及如何安排治疗顺序的数据尤其有限。因此,我们进行了一项新的专家意见调查,以弥合研究证据与关键临床决策之间的差距。
基于文献综述,编制了一份书面调查问卷,询问了48种特定临床情况下1276种精神药物干预选项。大多数选项使用兰德公司用于评估医疗决策适宜性的9分制的修改版本进行评分。我们联系了65位国内专家,其中58位(89%)完成了调查。通过卡方检验将每个选项的共识定义为分数的非随机分布。根据每个选项平均评分的置信区间,为其分配一个分类等级(一线/首选、二线/替代选择、三线/通常不合适)。然后针对关键临床情况制定了表明首选治疗策略的指南表。
专家小组就许多关键策略达成了共识,包括躁狂(欣快、混合和烦躁亚型)、抑郁和快速循环的急性和预防性治疗,以及处理治疗抵抗和共病并发症的方法。在治疗的所有阶段都建议使用心境稳定剂。丙戊酸(尤其是用于混合或烦躁亚型)和锂盐是这一类药物中用于躁狂急性和预防性治疗的基石选择。无论首先选择哪种药物,如果单一疗法失败,接下来推荐的干预措施是联合使用这些药物。然后,如果需要,这种联合用药可作为添加其他药物的基础。卡马西平是治疗躁狂的主要替代心境稳定剂。专家意见认为其他新型抗惊厥药为二线选择(例如,如果上述心境稳定剂失败或禁忌)。对于较轻的抑郁,一种心境稳定剂,尤其是锂盐,可作为单一疗法使用。丙戊酸和拉莫三嗪是其他一线选择。对于更严重的抑郁,应将标准抗抑郁药与锂盐或丙戊酸联合使用。安非他酮、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和文拉法辛是首选的抗抑郁药,缓解后应在2至6个月内逐渐减量。对于快速循环型抑郁或躁狂的初始治疗,建议使用丙戊酸单一疗法。对于伴有精神病性症状的躁狂或抑郁,建议将抗精神病药物与上述方案联合使用,并作为非精神病性发作的潜在辅助药物。非典型抗精神病药物,尤其是奥氮平和利培酮,通常比传统抗精神病药物更受青睐。还给出了关于难治性疾病患者使用电休克治疗(ECT)、氯氮平、甲状腺激素、兴奋剂和各种新型药物的建议。
尽管高质量数据存在明显差距,但专家们在双相情感障碍治疗的关键步骤上达成了高度共识。为了评估本次调查中的许多治疗选项,专家们不得不超越对照数据进行推断;然而,他们的建议通常较为保守。专家们对有高质量研究数据或有长期临床使用模式的初始策略和个别药物给予了最有力的支持。在专家意见的范围内,并理解新的研究数据可能具有优先性,这些指南以一种可用于告知临床医生并教育患者各种干预措施相对优点的方式,为解决常见临床问题提供了明确的途径。