• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

座椅整体不舒适度的定量预测

Quantitative prediction of overall seat discomfort.

作者信息

Ebe K, Griffin M J

机构信息

Human Factors Research Unit, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2000 Jun;43(6):791-806. doi: 10.1080/001401300404751.

DOI:10.1080/001401300404751
PMID:10902888
Abstract

Static seat characteristics (seat stiffness) and dynamic seat characteristics (vibration magnitude) can both influence judgements of seat comfort. It is proposed that seat comfort can be predicted on the basis of Steven's psychophysical law: psi = kphi(n), where psi is a sensation magnitude, phi is the stimulus magnitude and k is a constant. The law is modified to: psi = a + bphis[n(s)] + cphiv[n(v)], where phis and phiv represent seat stiffness and vibration magnitude, n(s) and n(v) are exponents determined by the rate of increase in discomfort associated with the stiffness and vibration magnitude, and a, b and c are constants. The stiffness of foam loaded to 490 N may indicate static seat comfort, while the vibration dose value (VDV) on the seat surface may indicate vibration discomfort. Two experiments with 20 subjects investigated this approach. The first experiment with five magnitudes of vibration, three foams and a rigid wooden flat seat yielded 0.929 for the exponent, n(v), for VDV. In the second experiment subjects judged the overall seat discomfort while exposed six vibration magnitudes with the same four seating conditions. This experiment yielded 1.18 for the exponent, n(s), for seat stiffness. The overall prediction of seat discomfort was given by: psi = -50.3 + 2.68phis1.18 + 101phiv0.929. The prediction equation provided more accurate estimates of subject discomfort than models using either the VDV alone or the stiffness alone, especially when the vibration magnitude was low or the seats were similar. An interaction variable between the VDV and the stiffness slightly improved the prediction. The equivalence of the two stimuli was given by log10 (stiffness) = 0.787 log10 (VDV) + 1.34, or log10 (VDV) = 1.27 log10 (stiffness) - 1.70.

摘要

静态座椅特性(座椅刚度)和动态座椅特性(振动幅度)都会影响对座椅舒适性的判断。有人提出,可以根据史蒂文斯心理物理学定律来预测座椅舒适性:ψ = kφⁿ,其中ψ是感觉强度,φ是刺激强度,k是常数。该定律修改为:ψ = a + bφsⁿ(s) + cφvⁿ(v),其中φs和φv分别代表座椅刚度和振动幅度,n(s)和n(v)是由与刚度和振动幅度相关的不适感增加率确定的指数,a、b和c是常数。加载到490 N的泡沫刚度可能表明静态座椅舒适性,而座椅表面的振动剂量值(VDV)可能表明振动不适感。对20名受试者进行的两项实验研究了这种方法。第一项实验采用了五种振动幅度、三种泡沫和一个刚性木制平板座椅,得出VDV的指数n(v)为0.929。在第二项实验中,受试者在相同的四种座椅条件下暴露于六种振动幅度时,判断整体座椅不适感。该实验得出座椅刚度的指数n(s)为1.18。座椅不适感的总体预测公式为:ψ = -50.3 + 2.68φs¹.¹⁸ + 101φv⁰.⁹²⁹。与单独使用VDV或刚度的模型相比,该预测方程能更准确地估计受试者的不适感,尤其是当振动幅度较低或座椅相似时。VDV和刚度之间的相互作用变量略微改善了预测效果。两种刺激的等效关系为log₁₀(刚度) = 0.787 log₁₀(VDV) + 1.34,或log₁₀(VDV) = 1.27 log₁₀(刚度) - 1.70。

相似文献

1
Quantitative prediction of overall seat discomfort.座椅整体不舒适度的定量预测
Ergonomics. 2000 Jun;43(6):791-806. doi: 10.1080/001401300404751.
2
Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors.包括静态和动态因素的座椅不舒适定性模型。
Ergonomics. 2000 Jun;43(6):771-90. doi: 10.1080/001401300404742.
3
Factors affecting static seat cushion comfort.影响静态座垫舒适度的因素。
Ergonomics. 2001 Aug 15;44(10):901-21. doi: 10.1080/00140130110064685.
4
The application of SEAT values for predicting how compliant seats with backrests influence vibration discomfort.利用座椅等效加速度总值(SEAT)预测带靠背座椅的柔顺性对振动不适的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2014 Nov;45(6):1461-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
5
Objective measurement of the start-motion quality of a forklift truck.叉车启动运动质量的客观测量。
Appl Ergon. 2004 Sep;35(5):467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.03.006.
6
Discomfort during lateral acceleration: influence of seat cushion and backrest.侧向加速度时的不适感:座垫和靠背的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2013 Jul;44(4):588-94. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.11.009. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
7
Predicting discomfort from whole-body vertical vibration when sitting with an inclined backrest.预测坐姿时背部倾斜的全身垂直振动引起的不适
Appl Ergon. 2013 May;44(3):423-34. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
8
Effects of seating on the discomfort caused by mechanical shocks: Measurement and prediction of SEAT values.坐姿对机械冲击引起的不适的影响:SEAT 值的测量和预测。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Jan;74:134-144. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
9
Influence of seat foam and geometrical properties on BioRID P3 kinematic response to rear impacts.座椅泡沫和几何特性对BioRID P3后向碰撞运动学响应的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Dec;4(4):315-23. doi: 10.1080/714040489.
10
Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: discomfort caused by sinusoidal vibration.坐姿人体对全身垂直振动的响应:正弦振动引起的不适
Ergonomics. 2014;57(5):714-32. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.898799. Epub 2014 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Car seat impact on driver's sitting behavior and perceived discomfort during prolonged real driving on varied road types.汽车座椅对驾驶员在不同类型道路上长时间真实驾驶时的坐姿行为和感知不适的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0259934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259934. eCollection 2021.
2
Gender difference in subjective response to whole-body vibration under standing posture.站立姿势下体感振动的主观反应存在性别差异。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012 Feb;85(2):171-9. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0657-0. Epub 2011 Jun 11.