Aix-Marseille Univ, CNRS, ISM, Marseille, France.
Stellantis, Centre Technique de Vélizy, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France.
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0259934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259934. eCollection 2021.
Prolonged driving under real conditions can entail discomfort linked to driving posture, seat design features, and road properties like whole-body vibrations (WBV). This study evaluated the effect of three different seats (S1 = soft; S2 = firm; S3 = soft with suspension system) on driver's sitting behavior and perceived discomfort on different road types in real driving conditions. Twenty-one participants drove the same 195 km itinerary alternating highway, city, country, and mountain segments. Throughout the driving sessions, Contact Pressure (CP), Contact Surface (CS), Seat Pressure Distribution Percentage (SPD%) and Repositioning Movements (RM) were recorded via two pressure mats installed on seat cushion and backrest. Moreover every 20 minutes, participants rated their whole-body and local discomfort. While the same increase in whole-body discomfort with driving time was observed for all three seats, S3 limited local perceived discomfort, especially in buttocks, thighs, neck, and upper back. The pressure profiles of the three seats were similar for CP, CS and RM on the backrest but differed on the seat cushion. The soft seats (S1 & S3) showed better pressure distribution, with lower SPD% than the firm seat (S2). All three showed highest CP and CS under the thighs. Road type also affected both CP and CS of all three seats, with significant differences appearing between early city, highway and country segments. In the light of these results, automotive manufacturers could enhance seat design for reduced driver discomfort by combining a soft seat cushion to reduce pressure peaks, a firm backrest to support the trunk, and a suspension system to minimize vibrations.
在真实驾驶条件下长时间驾驶可能会导致与驾驶姿势、座椅设计特点以及道路特性(如全身振动(WBV))相关的不适。本研究评估了三种不同座椅(S1=柔软;S2=坚固;S3=柔软带悬挂系统)对驾驶员坐姿和在真实驾驶条件下不同道路类型的感知不适的影响。21 名参与者在高速公路、城市、乡村和山区路段交替行驶相同的 195 公里行程。在整个驾驶过程中,通过安装在座椅垫和靠背的两个压力垫记录接触压力(CP)、接触面积(CS)、座椅压力分布百分比(SPD%)和重新定位动作(RM)。此外,每隔 20 分钟,参与者会对全身和局部不适进行评分。虽然在所有三种座椅上,随着驾驶时间的增加,全身不适感都相同,但 S3 限制了局部感知不适,特别是臀部、大腿、颈部和上背部。三种座椅的背部 CP、CS 和 RM 的压力分布相似,但座椅垫不同。柔软座椅(S1 和 S3)的压力分布更好, SPD%低于坚固座椅(S2)。所有三个座椅在大腿下的 CP 和 CS 最高。道路类型也会影响所有三种座椅的 CP 和 CS,早期城市、高速公路和乡村路段之间存在显著差异。鉴于这些结果,汽车制造商可以通过组合柔软的座椅垫来减少压力峰值、坚固的靠背来支撑躯干以及悬挂系统来最小化振动,从而增强座椅设计以减少驾驶员不适。