Suppr超能文献

对于进行性系统性硬化症患者,血清表面活性蛋白A和D水平是间质性肺病的有用生物标志物。

Serum levels of surfactant proteins A and D are useful biomarkers for interstitial lung disease in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis.

作者信息

Takahashi H, Kuroki Y, Tanaka H, Saito T, Kurokawa K, Chiba H, Sagawa A, Nagae H, Abe S

机构信息

Third Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Biochemistry, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jul;162(1):258-63. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.1.9903014.

Abstract

To find a less-invasive and lung-specific clinical biomarker, we measured serum levels of surfactant proteins A and D (SP-A and SP-D) by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in 42 patients with progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) to evaluate their significance in relation to the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and to assess their diagnostic merits. The patients were divided into two groups based on findings by chest computed tomography (CT): 30 patients with ILD (CT-positive ILD group), and 12 patients without any lung abnormalities (CT-negative ILD group). The CT-positive ILD group was further divided into two groups: 24 patients with ILD detectable by chest plain radiography (X-ray-positive ILD group) and six patients with ILD showing no abnormality (X-ray-negative ILD group). The levels of SP-A and SP-D in sera were significantly higher in the CT-positive ILD group than in the CT-negative ILD group. They were also significantly higher in the X-ray-positive ILD group than in the CT-negative ILD group. In the X-ray-negative ILD group, their levels were higher than those of the CT-negative ILD group. We next estimated sensitivity and specificity of SP-A, SP-D, and X-ray for detecting ILD on CT. Sensitivity of SP-D was high (77%) as well as that of X-ray (80%), whereas SP-A showed a low sensitivity (33%). Remarkably, five of six patients in the X-ray-negative ILD group showed SP-D concentrations over its cut-off level, thereby demonstrating that an SP-D assay contributes to the detection of ILD overlooked by X-ray. Moreover, a combination of X-ray and SP-D dramatically increases sensitivity to 97%. Specificity of SP-A, SP-D, and X-ray to the CT-negative ILD group was 100%, 83%, and 100%, respectively. In conclusion, this study indicates that elevated levels of serum SP-A and SP-D reflect well the presence of ILD and that the combination of SP-D and X-ray contributes to reduce the risk of clinicians overlooking ILD complicated by PSS, although a repetition in another set of subjects is needed to confirm these indications.

摘要

为了找到一种侵入性较小且针对肺部的临床生物标志物,我们采用夹心酶联免疫吸附测定法检测了42例进行性系统性硬化症(PSS)患者血清中表面活性蛋白A和D(SP-A和SP-D)的水平,以评估它们与间质性肺疾病(ILD)存在的相关性,并评估其诊断价值。根据胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)结果将患者分为两组:30例患有ILD的患者(CT阳性ILD组)和12例无任何肺部异常的患者(CT阴性ILD组)。CT阳性ILD组进一步分为两组:24例胸部X线平片可检测到ILD的患者(X线阳性ILD组)和6例ILD无异常表现的患者(X线阴性ILD组)。CT阳性ILD组血清中SP-A和SP-D水平显著高于CT阴性ILD组。它们在X线阳性ILD组中也显著高于CT阴性ILD组。在X线阴性ILD组中,它们的水平高于CT阴性ILD组。接下来,我们评估了SP-A、SP-D和X线对CT上检测ILD的敏感性和特异性。SP-D的敏感性较高(77%),X线的敏感性也较高(80%),而SP-A的敏感性较低(33%)。值得注意的是,X线阴性ILD组的6例患者中有5例SP-D浓度超过其临界值,从而表明SP-D检测有助于发现X线遗漏的ILD。此外,X线和SP-D联合使用可将敏感性显著提高至97%。SP-A、SP-D和X线对CT阴性ILD组的特异性分别为100%、83%和100%。总之,本研究表明血清SP-A和SP-D水平升高很好地反映了ILD的存在,并且SP-D与X线联合使用有助于降低临床医生漏诊PSS合并ILD的风险,不过需要在另一组受试者中重复研究以证实这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验