• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧迫性对决策时间的影响。

The influence of urgency on decision time.

作者信息

Reddi B A, Carpenter R H

机构信息

The Physiological Laboratory, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EG, UK.

出版信息

Nat Neurosci. 2000 Aug;3(8):827-30. doi: 10.1038/77739.

DOI:10.1038/77739
PMID:10903577
Abstract

A fruitful quantitative approach to understanding how the brain makes decisions has been to look at the time needed to make a decision, and how it is affected by factors such as the supply of information, or an individual's expectations. This approach has led to a model of decision-making, consistent with recent neurophysiological data, that explains the observed variability of reaction times and correctly predicts the effects of altered expectations. Can it also predict what happens when the urgency of making the response changes? We asked subjects to make eye movements to low-visibility targets either as fast or as accurately as possible, and found that the model does indeed predict the timing of their responses: the degree of urgency seems to influence the criterion level at which a decision signal triggers a response.

摘要

一种卓有成效的定量方法,用于理解大脑如何做出决策,就是观察做出决策所需的时间,以及它如何受到诸如信息供应或个体期望等因素的影响。这种方法已得出一种决策模型,该模型与近期的神经生理学数据一致,它解释了观察到的反应时间变异性,并正确预测了期望改变的影响。它能否还预测当做出反应的紧迫性改变时会发生什么呢?我们要求受试者尽可能快速或准确地向低可见度目标进行眼球运动,结果发现该模型确实能预测他们的反应时间:紧迫性程度似乎会影响决策信号触发反应的标准水平。

相似文献

1
The influence of urgency on decision time.紧迫性对决策时间的影响。
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Aug;3(8):827-30. doi: 10.1038/77739.
2
Task switching as a two-stage decision process.任务切换作为一个两阶段决策过程。
J Neurophysiol. 2006 May;95(5):3146-53. doi: 10.1152/jn.01184.2005. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
3
A neural model of decision-making by the superior colicullus in an antisaccade task.上丘在反扫视任务中进行决策的神经模型。
Neural Netw. 2007 Aug;20(6):690-704. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Mar 18.
4
Accuracy, information, and response time in a saccadic decision task.扫视决策任务中的准确性、信息及反应时间。
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Nov;90(5):3538-46. doi: 10.1152/jn.00689.2002. Epub 2003 Jun 18.
5
Interstimulus contingency facilitates saccadic responses in a bimodal go/no-go task.刺激间的关联性在双模式执行/不执行任务中促进了扫视反应。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):261-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.06.006.
6
Antisaccades as decisions: LATER model predicts latency distributions and error responses.反扫视作为决策:LATER 模型预测潜伏期分布和错误反应。
Eur J Neurosci. 2013 Jan;37(2):330-8. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12025. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
7
Larger variability of saccadic reaction times in schizophrenia patients.精神分裂症患者扫视反应时间的变异性更大。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Jul 30;168(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.04.015. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
8
The time course of saccadic decision making: dynamic field theory.扫视决策的时间进程:动态场理论
Neural Netw. 2006 Oct;19(8):1059-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
9
Strength of figure-ground activity in monkey primary visual cortex predicts saccadic reaction time in a delayed detection task.猴子初级视觉皮层中图形-背景活动的强度可预测延迟检测任务中的扫视反应时间。
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jun;17(6):1468-75. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl058. Epub 2006 Aug 18.
10
The time course of stimulus expectation in a saccadic decision task.扫视决策任务中刺激预期的时间进程。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):2722-30. doi: 10.1152/jn.01238.2006. Epub 2007 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The limits of metacognitive control during perceptual decision-making: opting out without improving accuracy.知觉决策过程中元认知控制的局限性:在不提高准确性的情况下选择退出。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 20;16:1551665. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1551665. eCollection 2025.
2
Speed is associated with polarization during subjective evaluation: no tradeoff, but an effect of the ease of processing.在主观评价过程中,速度与两极分化相关:不存在权衡取舍,而是处理难易程度的一种效应。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Dec;18(6):3691-3714. doi: 10.1007/s11571-024-10151-8. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Reflexive eye saccadic parameters in Parkinson's disease.
帕金森病中的反射性眼球扫视参数。
Front Med Technol. 2024 Nov 25;6:1477502. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1477502. eCollection 2024.
4
Dissociable Effects of Urgency and Evidence Accumulation during Reaching Revealed by Dynamic Multisensory Integration.动态多感官整合揭示的伸手过程中紧迫性和证据积累的可分离效应
eNeuro. 2024 Dec 9;11(12). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0262-24.2024. Print 2024 Dec.
5
Graded decisions in the human brain.人类大脑的分级决策。
Nat Commun. 2024 May 21;15(1):4308. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48342-w.
6
Balancing true and false detection of intermittent sensory targets by adjusting the inputs to the evidence accumulation process.通过调整证据积累过程的输入来平衡间歇性感觉目标的真阳性和假阳性检测。
Elife. 2023 Aug 30;12:e83025. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83025.
7
Controlling the trajectory of a moving object substantially shortens the latency of motor responses to visual stimuli.控制移动物体的轨迹可大幅缩短对视觉刺激的运动反应延迟。
iScience. 2023 May 6;26(6):106838. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106838. eCollection 2023 Jun 16.
8
Sensorimotor feedback loops are selectively sensitive to reward.感觉运动反馈回路对奖励具有选择性敏感性。
Elife. 2023 Jan 13;12:e81325. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81325.
9
Post-saccadic Eye Movement Indices Under Cognitive Load: A Path Analysis to Determine Visual Performance.认知负荷下扫视后眼动指标:确定视觉表现的路径分析
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2022 Aug 15;17(3):397-404. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v17i3.11578. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
10
Attaining the recesses of the cognitive space.进入认知空间的深处。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2022 Aug;16(4):767-778. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09755-1. Epub 2021 Nov 20.