Pah Nemuel D, Ngo Quoc C, McConnell Nicole, Polus Barbara, Kempster Peter, Bhattacharya Arup, Raghav Sanjay, Kumar Dinesh K
School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Electrical Engineering, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Front Med Technol. 2024 Nov 25;6:1477502. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1477502. eCollection 2024.
Abnormal reactive saccade, with reduced saccadic gain, impaired smooth pursuit, and unwarranted reactions are clinically used to assess people with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). However, there are inconsistent findings related to other saccade parameters such as latency and transition times. This study aimed to identify differences in the reflexive saccade parameters of early stage PwPD and aged-matched control (AMC).
In this observational study, the reactive eye-gaze was recorded for 70 participants (42 PwPD) and parameters of reflexive saccades and eye-gaze fluctuations were extracted. These parameters were then statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney -test.
Results showed that PwPD had significantly shorter latency than AMC for reflexive saccadic movement away from the center of the screen. The overshoot as a fraction of the screen width, a measure of the inaccuracy in reaching the target, was also significantly higher for PwPD. PwPD had greater horizontal and vertical eye gaze fluctuation with a steady target. The numbers of invalid saccades, i.e., when the gaze goes in the opposite direction from the target movement or is considered anticipatory, were similar for both groups; PwPD with 33.43% and AMC with 25.71%.
This study shows that there are significant differences in the reflexive saccade of PwPD and AMC measured using an inexpensive eye-tracking device. The presence of invalid saccade trials, and differences between towards and away from screen center, both of which were not considered in earlier studies, may explain the discrepancies between earlier studies. The outcome of this study has the potential to be made a device that would assist neurologists in the assessment of PwPD.
异常的反应性扫视,伴有扫视增益降低、平稳跟踪受损和无端反应,临床上用于评估帕金森病患者(PwPD)。然而,关于其他扫视参数,如潜伏期和过渡时间,存在不一致的研究结果。本研究旨在确定早期PwPD患者与年龄匹配的对照组(AMC)在反射性扫视参数上的差异。
在这项观察性研究中,记录了70名参与者(42名PwPD患者)的反应性眼注视,并提取了反射性扫视和眼注视波动的参数。然后使用曼-惠特尼U检验对这些参数进行统计分析。
结果显示,对于从屏幕中心移开的反射性扫视运动,PwPD患者的潜伏期明显短于AMC组。作为屏幕宽度一部分的过冲,即到达目标时不准确性的一种度量,PwPD患者也明显更高。在目标稳定时,PwPD患者的水平和垂直眼注视波动更大。无效扫视的数量,即当注视方向与目标运动方向相反或被认为是预期性的情况,两组相似;PwPD患者为33.43%,AMC组为25.71%。
本研究表明,使用廉价的眼动追踪设备测量时,PwPD患者和AMC组在反射性扫视方面存在显著差异。早期研究未考虑的无效扫视试验的存在,以及朝向和远离屏幕中心的差异,可能解释了早期研究之间的差异。本研究的结果有可能制成一种设备,协助神经科医生评估PwPD患者。