Suppr超能文献

标本充足性与薄层液基细胞学检测:宫颈管成分

Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.

作者信息

Selvaggi S M, Guidos B J

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Cytopathol. 2000 Jul;23(1):23-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0339(200007)23:1<23::AID-DC5>3.0.CO;2-K.

Abstract

The ThinPrep Pap Test (Cyryc Corp., Boxborough, MA) has proven to be effective in decreasing the number of cervical specimens limited for interpretation by blood/inflammatory exudate as compared to conventional smears. However, its effectiveness in decreasing the number of preparations which lack an endocervical component is less well-established. The purpose of this 1-yr study (January 1998-December 1998) was to determine if the collecting instruments used by physicians played a role in the lack of an endocervical component on ThinPrep slides. On implementation of the ThinPrep Pap Test for cervical cytology, the broom-type sampling device (Papette, Wallach Surgical Devices, Inc., Millford, CT) was the FDA-approved collecting instrument. Subsequently the combined plastic spatula/Zelsmyr Cytobrush (Medscand, Inc., Hollywood, FL) were approved. A survey was sent to 102 physicians in seven primarY care sites and two private obstetrics-gynecology practices affiliated with the Loyola University Health Care System. One site used the broom only, one site used the spatula/cytobrush, five sites used the broom/cytobrush, and in two sites, two different sets of collecting instruments were utilized. Of the 10,241 ThinPrep samples, 620 (6%) were obtained with the broom only, 432 (4.3%) with the spatula/cytobrush, and 9,189 (89.7%) with the broom/cytobrush. An endocervical component was absent in 24% (range, 13.7-25%) of the cervical samples collected with the broom only, 10% (range, 8.4-12.5%) with the spatula/cytobrush, and 13% (range, 6.2-18.8%) with the broom/ cytobrush. The spatula/cytobrush and the broom/cytobrush showed statistical significance (P < 0.001) over the broom alone in the collection of an endocervical component. The results of this study indicate that the collecting instruments used by the physician(s) played a role in the adequacy (endocervical component) of the specimen processed by the ThinPrep method. Diagn. Cyto

摘要

与传统涂片相比,ThinPrep巴氏试验(Cyryc公司,马萨诸塞州博克斯伯勒)已被证明能有效减少因血液/炎性渗出物导致难以判读的宫颈标本数量。然而,其在减少缺乏宫颈管成分的制片数量方面的有效性尚缺乏充分证据。这项为期1年(1998年1月至1998年12月)的研究旨在确定医生使用的采集器械是否与ThinPrep玻片上缺乏宫颈管成分有关。在将ThinPrep巴氏试验用于宫颈细胞学检查时,扫帚型采样装置(Papette,Wallach外科器械公司,康涅狄格州米尔福德)是经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的采集器械。随后,塑料刮板/Zelsmyr细胞刷组合(Medscand公司,佛罗里达州好莱坞)也获得批准。向洛约拉大学医疗系统下属的7个初级保健机构和2个私立妇产科诊所的102名医生发送了一份调查问卷。其中一个机构仅使用扫帚,一个机构使用刮板/细胞刷,5个机构使用扫帚/细胞刷,还有2个机构使用两组不同的采集器械。在10241份ThinPrep样本中,仅用扫帚采集的有620份(6%),用刮板/细胞刷采集的有432份(4.3%),用扫帚/细胞刷采集的有9189份(89.7%)。仅用扫帚采集的宫颈样本中,24%(范围为13.7% - 25%)缺乏宫颈管成分;用刮板/细胞刷采集的样本中,这一比例为10%(范围为8.4% - 12.5%);用扫帚/细胞刷采集的样本中,这一比例为13%(范围为6.2% - 18.8%)。在采集宫颈管成分方面,刮板/细胞刷和扫帚/细胞刷与仅用扫帚相比具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。这项研究结果表明,医生使用的采集器械对ThinPrep方法处理的标本的充分性(宫颈管成分)有影响。诊断细胞病理学

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验