Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 和疫苗诱导的免疫性血小板减少症和血栓形成(VITT)中使用活化部分凝血活酶时间监测阿加曲班时应谨慎。

Caution in Using the Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time to Monitor Argatroban in COVID-19 and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT).

机构信息

414090Sheffield Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.

152809The University of Sheffield Department of Infection Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2021 Jan-Dec;27:10760296211066945. doi: 10.1177/10760296211066945.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Argatroban is licensed for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and is conventionally monitored by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) ratio. The target range is 1.5 to 3.0 times the patients' baseline APTT and not exceeding 100 s, however this baseline is not always known. APTT is known to plateau at higher levels of argatroban, and is influenced by coagulopathies, lupus anticoagulant and raised FVIII levels. It has been used as a treatment for COVID-19 and Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT). Some recent publications have favored the use of anti-IIa methods to determine the plasma drug concentration of argatroban.

METHODS

Plasma of 60 samples from 3 COVID-19 patients and 54 samples from 5 VITT patients were tested by APTT ratio and anti-IIa method (dilute thrombin time dTT). Actin FS APTT ratios were derived from the baseline APTT of the patient and the mean normal APTT.

RESULTS

Mean APTT ratio derived from baseline was 1.71 (COVID-19), 1.33 (VITT) compared to APTT ratio by mean normal 1.65 (COVID-19), 1.48 (VITT). dTT mean concentration was 0.64 µg/ml (COVID-19) 0.53 µg/ml (VITT) with poor correlations to COVID-19 baseline APTT ratio r = 0.1526 p <0.0001, mean normal r = 0.2188 p < 0.0001; VITT baseline APTT ratio r = 0.04 p < 0.001, VITT mean normal r = 0.0064 p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that dTT is a superior method to monitor the concentration of argatroban, we have demonstrated significant differences between APTT ratios and dTT levels, which could have clinical impact. This is especially so in COVID-19 and VITT.

摘要

简介

阿加曲班已获准用于肝素诱导的血小板减少症患者,并通过活化部分凝血活酶时间 (APTT) 比值进行常规监测。目标范围是患者基础 APTT 的 1.5 至 3.0 倍,且不超过 100 秒,但这一基础值并非总是可知。APTT 在阿加曲班的较高水平时趋于稳定,且受到凝血障碍、狼疮抗凝剂和升高的 FVIII 水平的影响。它已被用于治疗 COVID-19 和疫苗诱导的免疫性血小板减少症和血栓形成(VITT)。一些最近的出版物倾向于使用抗 IIa 方法来确定阿加曲班的血浆药物浓度。

方法

对 3 名 COVID-19 患者的 60 份样本和 5 名 VITT 患者的 54 份样本进行 APTT 比值和抗 IIa 方法(稀释凝血酶时间 dTT)检测。Actin FS APTT 比值由患者的基础 APTT 和平均正常 APTT 推导得出。

结果

从基础值推导的平均 APTT 比值为 1.71(COVID-19)和 1.33(VITT),而通过平均正常值计算的 APTT 比值为 1.65(COVID-19)和 1.48(VITT)。dTT 平均浓度分别为 0.64μg/ml(COVID-19)和 0.53μg/ml(VITT),与 COVID-19 基础 APTT 比值的相关性较差,r=0.1526,p<0.0001,与平均正常值的相关性较好,r=0.2188,p<0.0001;与 VITT 基础 APTT 比值的相关性较差,r=0.04,p<0.001,与 VITT 平均正常值的相关性较差,r=0.0064,p<0.001。

结论

我们认为 dTT 是监测阿加曲班浓度的一种更好的方法,我们已经证明了 APTT 比值和 dTT 水平之间存在显著差异,这可能具有临床意义。在 COVID-19 和 VITT 中尤其如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9385/8689594/e215f1abe423/10.1177_10760296211066945-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验