Suppr超能文献

肾功能对肝素诱导的血小板减少症中阿加曲班治疗的影响。

Effect of renal function on argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

作者信息

Guzzi Louis M, McCollum David A, Hursting Marcie J

机构信息

Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006 Dec;22(3):169-76. doi: 10.1007/s11239-006-9019-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Argatroban is considered to be an alternative anticoagulant of choice in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and renal impairment. The recommended initial dose in HIT is 2 microg/kg/min (0.5 microg/kg/min in hepatic impairment), adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) 1.5-3 times baseline. Although argatroban is predominantly hepatically metabolized with minimal renal clearance, recent limited data have suggested that a patient's renal function should also be considered when initiating argatroban therapy for HIT. We retrospectively evaluated the effect of renal function on argatroban therapy in HIT patients with normal hepatic function, with the goal of refining dosing guidance, if needed.

METHODS

From case records of previous prospective studies of argatroban in clinically diagnosed HIT, we identified patients who had baseline laboratory data on liver and renal function. Individuals with abnormal hepatic function (serum total bilirubin > 1.5 mg/dl or ALT or AST > 100 U/l) were excluded. Patients were stratified according to their estimated creatinine clearance (CL(cr)): normal or mild impairment (CL(cr) > 60 ml/min), moderate impairment (CL(cr) 30-60 ml/min), or severe impairment (CL(cr) < 30 ml/min). Argatroban doses, aPTTs, and clinical outcomes were summarized overall and by group. By-patient relationships between CL(cr) and dose or aPTT during therapy were explored using regression analyses.

RESULTS

The analysis population included 260 patients with normal to mild (n = 144), moderate (n = 80), or severe (n = 36) renal impairment. Argatroban was initiated at a mean infusion dose of 1.8 +/- 0.7 microg/kg/min (overall), titrated to achieve aPTTs 1.5-3 times baseline. Among renal function groups, no significant differences occurred in argatroban dose during therapy (overall value, 1.9 +/- 1.1 microg/kg/min), duration of therapy (7 +/- 6 days), or aPTTs (63 +/- 17 s). Regression analyses showed a 0.1 microg/kg/min increase in dose (r2 = 0.02) for each 30 ml/min increase in CL(cr). Within a 37 day follow-up, 46 (17.7%) patients died, most often when severe renal impairment was present. New thrombosis (11.5% overall) and major bleeding (5.0%) did not differ among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of HIT patients with normal hepatic function and varying levels of renal function, argatroban administered in accordance with current recommendations provided adequate levels of anticoagulation and was well tolerated. Altered renal function did not clinically significantly affect argatroban doses, aPTT responses, or rates of thrombosis or bleeding. These findings further support argatroban as an alternative anticoagulant of choice, without need for initial dose adjustment, in most patients with HIT and renal impairment.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

We retrospectively evaluated the effect of renal function on argatroban therapy in HIT patients with normal hepatic function, with the goal of refining current dosing guidance, if needed. From previous prospective studies of argatroban in HIT, we identified 260 patients with clinically diagnosed HIT, normal hepatic function, and varying degrees of renal function. Among patients whose renal function was normal or mildly impaired (estimated creatinine clearance, CL(cr) > 60 ml/min); moderately impaired (CL(cr) 30-60 ml/min), or severely impaired (CL(cr) < 30 ml/min), no significant differences occurred in the argatroban dose, aPTT response, duration of therapy, or rates of thrombosis or major bleeding. By regression analysis, there was a clinically insignificant 0.1 microg/kg/min increase in dose for each 30 ml/min increase in CL(cr). Overall, argatroban administered in accordance with current recommendations provided adequate levels of anticoagulation and was well tolerated, supporting its use as an alternative anticoagulant of choice, without need for initial dose adjustment, in most patients with HIT and renal impairment.

摘要

背景

阿加曲班被认为是肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)和肾功能损害患者的一种替代抗凝剂选择。HIT患者的推荐初始剂量为2微克/千克/分钟(肝功能损害患者为0.5微克/千克/分钟),调整剂量以使活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)达到基线值的1.5 - 3倍。尽管阿加曲班主要通过肝脏代谢,经肾脏清除的极少,但最近的有限数据表明,在开始对HIT患者进行阿加曲班治疗时,也应考虑患者的肾功能。我们回顾性评估了肾功能对肝功能正常的HIT患者阿加曲班治疗的影响,目的是在必要时完善给药指导。

方法

从之前关于阿加曲班治疗临床诊断HIT的前瞻性研究的病例记录中,我们确定了有肝脏和肾功能基线实验室数据的患者。肝功能异常(血清总胆红素>1.5毫克/分升或ALT或AST>100 U/L)的个体被排除。根据估计的肌酐清除率(CL(cr))对患者进行分层:正常或轻度损害(CL(cr)>60毫升/分钟)、中度损害(CL(cr) 30 - 60毫升/分钟)或重度损害(CL(cr)<30毫升/分钟)。总体及按组总结了阿加曲班剂量、aPTT和临床结果。使用回归分析探讨了治疗期间CL(cr)与剂量或aPTT之间的个体间关系。

结果

分析人群包括260例肾功能正常至轻度(n = 144)、中度(n = 80)或重度(n = 36)损害的患者。阿加曲班开始时的平均输注剂量为1.8±0.7微克/千克/分钟(总体),调整剂量以使aPTT达到基线值的1.5 - 3倍。在各肾功能组中,治疗期间阿加曲班剂量(总体值为1.9±1.1微克/千克/分钟)、治疗持续时间(7±6天)或aPTT(63±17秒)无显著差异。回归分析显示,CL(cr)每增加30毫升/分钟,剂量增加0.1微克/千克/分钟(r2 = 0.02)。在37天的随访期内,46例(17.7%)患者死亡,最常见于存在严重肾功能损害时。新血栓形成(总体11.5%)和大出血(5.0%)在各组间无差异。

结论

在这一大群肝功能正常、肾功能水平各异的HIT患者中,按照当前推荐使用阿加曲班可提供足够的抗凝水平且耐受性良好。肾功能改变在临床上并未显著影响阿加曲班剂量、aPTT反应或血栓形成或出血发生率。这些发现进一步支持阿加曲班作为大多数HIT和肾功能损害患者的替代抗凝剂选择,无需进行初始剂量调整。

摘要

我们回顾性评估了肾功能对肝功能正常的HIT患者阿加曲班治疗的影响,目的是在必要时完善当前给药指导。从之前关于阿加曲班治疗HIT的前瞻性研究中,我们确定了260例临床诊断为HIT、肝功能正常且肾功能程度不同的患者。在肾功能正常或轻度损害(估计肌酐清除率,CL(cr)>60毫升/分钟)、中度损害(CL(cr) 30 - 60毫升/分钟)或重度损害(CL(cr)<30毫升/分钟)的患者中,阿加曲班剂量、aPTT反应、治疗持续时间或血栓形成或大出血发生率无显著差异。通过回归分析,CL(cr)每增加30毫升/分钟,剂量临床上无显著增加0.1微克/千克/分钟。总体而言,按照当前推荐使用阿加曲班可提供足够的抗凝水平且耐受性良好,支持其作为大多数HIT和肾功能损害患者的替代抗凝剂选择,无需进行初始剂量调整。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验