• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阴道胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤的盆腔脏器清除术:综述

Pelvic exenteration for vaginal embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: a review.

作者信息

Hilgers R D

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Feb;45(2):175-80.

PMID:1090863
Abstract

The English language literature for the years 1935-1972 was reviewed to assess the effect of pelvic exenteration on vaginal embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. Twenty-one cases were determined eligible for review. Tumor was confined to the vagina in 8 cases and extended beyond the vagina in 13 cases. Treatment by pelvic exenteration was found to be relatively ineffective means of curing patients with tumor extending beyond the limits of the vagina. Recent evidence from the literature indicates that better results can be obtained by coordinated treatment, ie, surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy, than by surgery alone.

摘要

回顾了1935年至1972年的英文文献,以评估盆腔脏器清除术对阴道胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤的疗效。确定了21例符合审查条件的病例。8例肿瘤局限于阴道,13例肿瘤超出阴道范围。对于肿瘤超出阴道范围的患者,盆腔脏器清除术被发现是一种相对无效的治疗方法。文献中的最新证据表明,通过手术、放疗和/或化疗等综合治疗,比单纯手术能取得更好的效果。

相似文献

1
Pelvic exenteration for vaginal embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: a review.阴道胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤的盆腔脏器清除术:综述
Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Feb;45(2):175-80.
2
Myogenin and desmin immunohistochemistry in the assessment of post-chemotherapy genitourinary embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: prognostic and management implications.肌生成素和结蛋白免疫组织化学在化疗后泌尿生殖系统胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤评估中的应用:对预后及治疗的意义
J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 2):1751-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.117.
3
Pelvic exenteration for malignant melanomas of the vagina or urethra with over 3 mm of invasion.针对浸润深度超过3毫米的阴道或尿道恶性黑色素瘤进行盆腔脏器切除术。
Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Dec;59(3):338-41. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.9966.
4
The role of surgical resection when combined with chemotherapy and radiation in the management of pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma.手术切除联合化疗和放疗在盆腔横纹肌肉瘤治疗中的作用。
Ann Surg. 1984 May;199(5):509-14. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198405000-00003.
5
Primary spindle cell sarcoma of the vagina treated with neoadjuvant radiation and pelvic exenteration.经新辅助放疗及盆腔脏器清除术治疗的原发性阴道梭形细胞肉瘤。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007 Apr;11(2):105-7. doi: 10.1097/01.lgt.0000245037.06977.43.
6
Vaginal neoplasms in infancy: the combined role of chemotherapy and conservative surgical resection.
J Pediatr Surg. 1988 Sep;23(9):842-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(88)80236-7.
7
Lower genital tract rhabdomyosarcoma: case series and literature review.下生殖道横纹肌肉瘤:病例系列及文献综述
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Jul;278(1):65-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0503-5. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
8
Combined radical surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy in infants with vulvovaginal embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma.联合根治性手术、放射治疗和化疗治疗婴幼儿外阴阴道胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤
Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Oct;42(4):522-6. doi: 10.1097/00006250-197310000-00006.
9
[Malignant tumors of the genitalia in girls].[女童生殖器恶性肿瘤]
Vopr Onkol. 1986;32(1):74-80.
10
Botryoid rhabdomyosarcoma of vagina--two case reports.阴道葡萄状横纹肌肉瘤——两例报告
J Indian Med Assoc. 2004 Sep;102(9):512, 514.

引用本文的文献

1
Rhabdomyosarcoma of Cervix: A Case Report.宫颈横纹肌肉瘤:一例报告
Iran J Cancer Prev. 2016 Jun 18;9(3):e4383. doi: 10.17795/ijcp-4383. eCollection 2016 Jun.
2
Management of stage I cervical sarcoma botryoides in childhood and adolescence.儿童及青少年I期葡萄状宫颈肉瘤的管理
Eur J Pediatr. 2004 Aug;163(8):452-6. doi: 10.1007/s00431-004-1469-y. Epub 2004 Jun 2.
3
Conservative treatment followed by chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide for cervical sarcoma botryoides in young females.年轻女性葡萄状宫颈肉瘤采用保守治疗后联合阿霉素和异环磷酰胺进行化疗。
Br J Cancer. 1999 May;80(3-4):403-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690370.
4
The management of rhabdomyosarcoma in children and young adults.儿童和青年横纹肌肉瘤的管理
World J Surg. 1980 Jan;4(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/BF02393087.
5
Sarcoma botryoides of the vagina.阴道葡萄状肉瘤
Indian J Pediatr. 1983 Jul-Aug;50(405):445-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02753388.