Suter D, Chen F
Department of Electrical Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton Vic, Australia.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000 Apr;19(4):295-305. doi: 10.1109/42.848181.
In medical imaging it is common to reconstruct dense motion estimates, from sparse measurements of that motion, using some form of elastic spline (thin-plate spline, snakes and other deformable models, etc.). Usually the elastic spline uses only bending energy (second-order smoothness constraint) or stretching energy (first-order smoothness constraint), or a combination of the two. These elastic splines belong to a family of elastic vector splines called the Laplacian splines. This spline family is derived from an energy minimization functional, which is composed of multiple-order smoothness constraints. These splines can be explicitly tuned to vary the smoothness of the solution according to the deformation in the modeled material/tissue. In this context, it is natural to question which members of the family will reconstruct the motion more accurately. We compare different members of this spline family to assess how well these splines reconstruct human cardiac motion. We find that the commonly used splines (containing first-order and/or second-order smoothness terms only) are not the most accurate for modeling human cardiac motion.
在医学成像中,通常会使用某种形式的弹性样条(薄板样条、蛇形模型及其他可变形模型等),从运动的稀疏测量值中重建密集的运动估计值。通常,弹性样条仅使用弯曲能量(二阶平滑约束)或拉伸能量(一阶平滑约束),或两者的组合。这些弹性样条属于一类称为拉普拉斯样条的弹性向量样条。这个样条族源自一个能量最小化泛函,该泛函由多阶平滑约束组成。这些样条可以根据建模材料/组织中的变形进行显式调整,以改变解的平滑度。在这种情况下,很自然会质疑该样条族中的哪些成员能更准确地重建运动。我们比较了这个样条族的不同成员,以评估这些样条对人类心脏运动的重建效果。我们发现,常用的样条(仅包含一阶和/或二阶平滑项)在模拟人类心脏运动时并非最准确的。