Bambauer R, Schiel R, Latza R
Institute for Blood Purification, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Ther Apher. 2000 Jun;4(3):213-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2000.00180.x.
The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidaemia (HLP), sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, and coronary heart disease (CHD) refractory to diet and lipid lowering drugs is poor. A new therapeutic option for such patients is regular treatment with low density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. In total 33 patients (16 males, 17 female, aged 43.8+/-14.3 years), suffering from severe HLP resistant to diet and lipid lowering drugs, were treated for 62.3+/-21.3 (range, 1-113) months with LDL-apheresis. Four different LDL-apheresis systems were used: the dextran sulfate adsorption for 28 of 33 (Liposorber, Kaneka, Japan), immunoadsorption for 2 of 33 (Therasorb, Baxter, Germany), LDL-hemoperfusion for 2 of 33 (Dali, Fresenius, Germany), and the immunoadsorption system with special antilipoprotein (a) columns for 1 of 33 patients (Lipopak, Pocard, Russia). Before applying LDL-apheresis, 27 of 33 patients suffered from CHD with severe angina pectoris symptoms, a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery venous bypass (CAVB). With LDL-apheresis, reductions (p < 0.05) of 46% for total cholesterol, 49% for LDL, 28% for Lp(a), and 38% for triglycerides were reached. Severe side-effects, such as shock or allergic reactions, were very rare (0.5%). In the course of treatment an improvement in general well-being and increased performance were experienced in 29 of 33 patients. In 23 of 27 patients suffering from CHD, a reduction of 60 to 100% of nitrate medication was observed. Regarding the different apheresis systems used, there were no significant differences with respect to the clinical outcome and concerning total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, and triglyceride concentrations. But, in respect to elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, the immunoadsorption method using special anti-lipoprotein (a) columns seems to be the most effective (-57% versus -25% [Kaneka, p < 0.05] or -23% [Baxter, p < 0.05]). The present data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL-apheresis in patients suffering from severe HLP, refractory to maximum conservative therapy, is effective and safe in long-term application.
患有严重高脂血症(HLP)(有时合并脂蛋白(a)水平升高)且对饮食和降脂药物治疗无效的冠心病(CHD)患者预后较差。对于此类患者,一种新的治疗选择是定期进行低密度脂蛋白(LDL)单采治疗。共有33例患者(16例男性,17例女性,年龄43.8±14.3岁),患有对饮食和降脂药物治疗无效的严重HLP,接受了LDL单采治疗62.3±21.3(范围1 - 113)个月。使用了四种不同的LDL单采系统:33例中的28例采用硫酸葡聚糖吸附法(Liposorber,日本Kaneka公司),33例中的2例采用免疫吸附法(Therasorb,德国Baxter公司),33例中的2例采用LDL血液灌流法(Dali,德国Fresenius公司),33例中的1例患者采用带有特殊抗脂蛋白(a)柱的免疫吸附系统(Lipopak,俄罗斯Pocard公司)。在进行LDL单采治疗前,33例患者中有27例患有CHD,伴有严重心绞痛症状、心肌梗死病史或冠状动脉静脉搭桥术(CAVB)。通过LDL单采治疗,总胆固醇降低了46%(p < 0.05),LDL降低了49%,Lp(a)降低了28%,甘油三酯降低了38%。严重的副作用,如休克或过敏反应,非常罕见(0.5%)。在治疗过程中,33例患者中有29例总体健康状况得到改善,身体机能增强。在27例患有CHD的患者中,有23例观察到硝酸酯类药物用量减少了60%至100%。关于所使用的不同单采系统,在临床结果以及总胆固醇、LDL、HDL和甘油三酯浓度方面没有显著差异。但是,对于升高的脂蛋白(a)水平,使用特殊抗脂蛋白(a)柱的免疫吸附方法似乎是最有效的(降低57%,而[Kaneka公司产品]降低25% [p < 0.05]或[Baxter公司产品]降低23% [p < 0.05])。目前的数据清楚地表明,对于患有严重HLP且对最大程度保守治疗无效的患者,长期应用LDL单采治疗是有效且安全的。