• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类中最佳的L(1)-L(2)基音水平分离与测试频率无关。

Optimal L(1)-L(2) primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans.

作者信息

Kummer P, Janssen T, Hulin P, Arnold W

机构信息

Hals-Nasen-Ohren Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2000 Aug;146(1-2):47-56. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00097-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00097-6
PMID:10913883
Abstract

Previous studies described a systematic asymmetry of the level of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission (DP) in the space of the primary tones levels L(1) and L(2) in normal-hearing humans. Optimal primary tone level separations L(1)-L(2), which result in maximum DP levels, were close to L(1)=L(2) at high levels, but continuously increased with decreasing stimulus level towards L(1)>L(2) (Gaskill and Brown, 1990, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 821-839). At these optimal L(1)-L(2), however, not only DP levels in normal hearing were maximal, but also trauma-induced DP reductions. A linear equation that approximates optimal L(1)-L(2) level separations thus was suggested to be optimum for use in clinical applications (Whitehead et al., 1995, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 2359-2377). It was the aim of this study to extend the generality of optimal L(1)-L(2) separations to the typical human test frequency range for f(2) frequencies between 1 and 8 kHz. DPs were measured in 22 normal-hearing human ears at 61 primary tone level combinations, with L(2) between 5 and 65 dB SPL and L(1) between 30 and 70 dB SPL (f(2)/f(1)=1.2). It was found that the systematic dependence of the maximum DP level on the L(1)-L(2) separation is independent on frequency. Optimal L(1)-L(2) level separations may well be approximated by a linear equation L(1)=a L(2)+(1-a) b (after Whitehead et al., 1995) with parameters a=0.4 and b=70 dB SPL at f(2) frequencies between 1 and 8 kHz and L(2) levels between 20 and 65 dB SPL. Below L(2)=20 dB SPL, the optimal L(1) was found to be almost constant. Following previous notions (Gaskill and Brown, 1990), an analysis of basilar membrane response data in experimental animals (after Ruggero and Rich, 1991, Hear. Res. 51, 215-230) is further presented that relates optimal L(1)-L(2) separations to frequency-selective compression of the basilar membrane. Based on the assumption that optimal conditions for the DP generation are equal primary tone responses at the f(2) place, a linear increase of the optimal L(1)-L(2) level separation is graphically demonstrated, similar to our results in human ears.

摘要

先前的研究描述了在听力正常的人类中,2f(1)-f(2)畸变产物耳声发射(DP)水平在初级音调水平L(1)和L(2)空间中的系统不对称性。在高声级时,导致最大DP水平的最佳初级音调水平间隔L(1)-L(2)接近L(1)=L(2),但随着刺激水平降低,L(1)-L(2)持续增加,趋向于L(1)>L(2)(Gaskill和Brown,1990年,《美国声学学会杂志》88卷,821 - 839页)。然而,在这些最佳L(1)-L(2)时,不仅正常听力中的DP水平最大,而且创伤引起的DP降低也最大。因此,有人提出一个近似最佳L(1)-L(2)水平间隔的线性方程在临床应用中是最佳的(Whitehead等人,1995年,《美国声学学会杂志》97卷,2359 - 2377页)。本研究的目的是将最佳L(1)-L(2)间隔的普遍性扩展到f(2)频率在1至8 kHz之间的典型人类测试频率范围。在22只听力正常的人耳中,以61种初级音调水平组合测量DP,L(2)在5至65 dB SPL之间,L(1)在30至70 dB SPL之间(f(2)/f(1)=1.2)。研究发现,最大DP水平对L(1)-L(2)间隔的系统依赖性与频率无关。最佳L(1)-L(2)水平间隔可以很好地用线性方程L(1)=a L(2)+(1 - a) b(参照Whitehead等人,1995年)近似,在f(2)频率为1至8 kHz且L(2)水平为20至65 dB SPL时,参数a = 0.4,b = 70 dB SPL。在L(2)=20 dB SPL以下,发现最佳L(1)几乎恒定。根据先前的观点(Gaskill和Brown,1990年),进一步呈现了对实验动物基底膜反应数据的分析(参照Ruggero和Rich,1991年,《听觉研究》51卷,215 - 230页),该分析将最佳L(1)-L(2)间隔与基底膜的频率选择性压缩联系起来。基于DP产生的最佳条件是在f(2)位置处初级音调反应相等的假设,以图形方式展示了最佳L(1)-L(2)水平间隔的线性增加,类似于我们在人耳中的结果。

相似文献

1
Optimal L(1)-L(2) primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans.人类中最佳的L(1)-L(2)基音水平分离与测试频率无关。
Hear Res. 2000 Aug;146(1-2):47-56. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00097-6.
2
Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.通过畸变产物耳声发射测量进行的耳蜗压缩估计
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Sep;114(3):1499-507. doi: 10.1121/1.1604122.
3
Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.通过畸变产物耳声发射输入/输出函数预测纯音听阈的进一步研究。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jun;113(6):3275-84. doi: 10.1121/1.1570433.
4
Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea.灰鼠耳蜗基底膜上的双音畸变。
J Neurophysiol. 1997 May;77(5):2385-99. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.5.2385.
5
Evidence for multiple DPOAE components based upon group delay of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion in the gerbil.
Hear Res. 2000 Feb;140(1-2):99-110. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00189-6.
6
Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.噪声中的语音识别:估计基底膜反应中压缩非线性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):682-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7156.
7
Level dependence of optimal stimulus level difference for evoking DPOAEs in the gerbil.
Hear Res. 2002 Dec;174(1-2):260-3. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00700-1.
8
Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.正常听力和听力受损人耳中的畸变产物耳声发射抑制调谐曲线。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jul;114(1):263-78. doi: 10.1121/1.1575751.
9
Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans.
Hear Res. 2003 Mar;177(1-2):111-22. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00028-5.
10
Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.耳蜗听力障碍的评估:正常畸变产物耳声发射测量
Ear Hear. 2007 Dec;28(6):778-92. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181576755.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ins and Outs of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Growth: A Review.畸变产物耳声发射增长的来龙去脉:综述
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2025 Feb;26(1):17-32. doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00969-8. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
2
A Variable-Stimulus Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Screening Method to Match Cochlear Place-Specific Properties.一种匹配耳蜗特定部位特性的可变刺激畸变产物耳声发射筛查方法。
Ear Hear. 2025;46(2):421-432. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001594. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
3
The relationship and interdependence of auditory thresholds, proposed behavioural measures of hidden hearing loss, and physiological measures of auditory function.
听觉阈值、所提出的隐匿性听力损失行为测量指标以及听觉功能生理测量指标之间的关系和相互依存性。
Int J Audiol. 2025 Jan;64(1):11-24. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2391986. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
4
Metabolic and Sensory Components of Age-Related Hearing Loss: Associations With Distortion- and Reflection-Based Otoacoustic Emissions.与基于失真和反射的耳声发射相关的与年龄相关的听力损失的代谢和感觉成分。
Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165231213776. doi: 10.1177/23312165231213776.
5
Characterizing a Joint Reflection-Distortion OAE Profile in Humans With Endolymphatic Hydrops.特发性膜迷路积水患者的联合声反射-失真耳声发射特征。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(6):1437-1450. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001387. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
6
The Effect of Stimuli Level on Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission in Normal Hearing Adults.刺激水平对正常听力成年人畸变产物耳声发射的影响。
Acoustics (Basel). 2023 Mar;5(1):72-86. doi: 10.3390/acoustics5010005. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
7
Optimizing distortion product otoacoustic emission recordings in normal-hearing ears by adopting cochlear place-specific stimuli.采用耳蜗位置特异性刺激优化正常听力耳的失真产物耳声发射记录。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Aug;152(2):776. doi: 10.1121/10.0013218.
8
Understanding Self-reported Hearing Disability in Adults With Normal Hearing.成人正常听力者自报听力障碍的理解。
Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):773-784. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001161.
9
A convolutional neural-network model of human cochlear mechanics and filter tuning for real-time applications.一种用于实时应用的人类耳蜗力学和滤波器调谐的卷积神经网络模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2021 Feb;3(2):134-143. doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-00286-8. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
10
Reliability of Measures Intended to Assess Threshold-Independent Hearing Disorders.用于评估阈下听力障碍的测量指标的可靠性。
Ear Hear. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):1267-1279. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000711.