Recent advances. Medical ethics.
作者信息
Singer P A
机构信息
University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics, 88 College Street, Toronto ON, Canada M5G-1L4.
出版信息
BMJ. 2000 Jul 29;321(7256):282-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.282.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Recent advances. Medical ethics.最新进展。医学伦理学。
BMJ. 2000 Jul 29;321(7256):282-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7256.282.
2
Medical ethics is whatever you say it is.医学伦理就是你所说的那样。
APA Newsl Philos Med. 2001 Fall;1(1):164-5.
3
Ethics and law for medical students: the core curriculum.医学生的伦理与法律：核心课程
J Med Ethics. 1998 Jun;24(3):147-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.3.147.
4
A medical student's experience of being taught medical ethics.一名医学生接受医学伦理学教学的经历。
Bull Med Ethics. 2004 Sep(201):13-8.
5
Workshop-based learning: a model for teaching ethics.基于工作坊的学习：一种道德教学模式
JAMA. 1995 Sep 6;274(9):770-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.770.
6
A model for teaching and assessing ethics and law within the clinical curriculum.临床课程中伦理与法律教学及评估的一种模式。
Eur J Med. 1993 Aug-Sep;2(7):424-9.
7
CQ sources/bibliography.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2010 Oct;19(4):527-9. doi: 10.1017/s0963180110000423.
8
Nationwide perspective on the use of a formal ethics curriculum during critical care fellowship training.
Acad Med. 1998 Jan;73(1):103. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199801000-00022.
9
The inescapable relevance of bioethics for the practicing clinician.生物伦理学对临床执业医师来说有着不可避免的相关性。
Chest. 2006 Dec;130(6):1864-72. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1864.
10
Teaching ethics in the health care setting. Part II: Sample syllabus.医疗环境中的伦理教学。第二部分：教学大纲示例。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991 Sep;1(3):263-72. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0162.
引用本文的文献
1
Challenges of the Medical Ethics PhD curriculum in Iran: A qualitative study.伊朗医学伦理学博士课程面临的挑战：一项定性研究。
Caspian J Intern Med. 2022 Summer;13(3):498-510. doi: 10.22088/cjim.13.3.498.
2
Physician-Patient Relationship, Assisted Suicide and the Italian Constitutional Court.医患关系、协助自杀与意大利宪法法院
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Dec;18(4):671-681. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10136-w. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
3
Severity as a Priority Setting Criterion: Setting a Challenging Research Agenda.严重性作为优先设置标准：制定具有挑战性的研究议程。
Health Care Anal. 2020 Mar;28(1):25-44. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00371-z.
4
Accountability for reasonableness: the relevance, or not, of exceptionality in resource allocation.合理性问责制：资源分配中特殊性的相关性与否。
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 May;18(2):217-27. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9592-7.
5
Research for better health: the Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process.改善健康的研究：巴拿马的优先事项设定经验及新流程的必要性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Aug 12;12:38. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-38.
6
Research priority setting for health policy and health systems strengthening in Nigeria: the policymakers and stakeholders perspective and involvement.尼日利亚卫生政策与卫生系统强化的研究重点设定：政策制定者与利益相关者的观点及参与情况
Pan Afr Med J. 2013 Sep 12;16:10. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2013.16.10.2318. eCollection 2013.
7
Ethics in medical curriculum; Ethics by the teachers for students and society.医学课程中的伦理学；教师为学生和社会讲授的伦理学。
Indian J Urol. 2009 Jul;25(3):337-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.56192.
8
For an indeterministic ethics. The emptiness of the rule in dubio pro vita and life cessation decisions.对于一种非决定论的伦理学。“疑则从宽”规则的空洞性与生命终止决策
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2009 May 14;4:6. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-4-6.
9
Successful priority setting in low and middle income countries: a framework for evaluation.在中低收入国家成功设定优先级：评估框架。
Health Care Anal. 2010 Jun;18(2):129-47. doi: 10.1007/s10728-009-0115-2. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
10
Ethical considerations for short-term experiences by trainees in global health.全球健康领域实习生短期经历的伦理考量
JAMA. 2008 Sep 24;300(12):1456-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.12.1456.
本文引用的文献
1
Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers.医疗保健的局限：公平程序、民主审议与保险公司的正当性问题
Philos Public Aff. 1997 Fall;26(4):303-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00082.x.
2
Can old cells learn new tricks?衰老细胞能学会新技能吗？
Science. 2000 Feb 25;287(5457):1418-9. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1418.
3
Let's talk about error.我们来谈谈误差。
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):730. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.730.
4
Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too.医疗差错：第二位受害者。犯错的医生同样需要帮助。
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):726-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726.
5
Safe health care: are we up to it?安全医疗：我们能做到吗？
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):725-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.725.
6
Out of Eden: stem cells and their niches.走出伊甸园：干细胞及其微环境
Science. 2000 Feb 25;287(5457):1427-30. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1427.
7
A time for restraint.
Science. 2000 Feb 25;287(5457):1424. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1424.
8
Patients' voices: the powerful sound in the stem cell debate.
Science. 2000 Feb 25;287(5457):1423. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1423.
9
Poverty and inequity: a proper focus for the new century.贫困与不平等：新世纪的恰当关注点。
Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):1-2.
10
Tragic choices in health care: lessons from the child B case.医疗保健中的悲剧性抉择：儿童B案例的教训
BMJ. 1999 Nov 6;319(7219):1258-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1258.
Zotero 插件