Oe B, de Fijter C W, Geers T B, Vos P F, Donker A J, de Vries P M
Cardiovascular Research School ICaR-VU, Department of Internal Medicine, Academic Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Artif Organs. 2000 Jul;24(7):575-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.2000.06502.x.
In 19 stable peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, hydration status was evaluated by measurement of vena cava diameter (VCD) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) variables: intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW), and total body water (TBW). We investigated whether BIA can replace VCD. VCD did not correlate with TBW but correlated moderately with ECW/TBW (r = 0.42; 0.025 < p < 0.05) and ICW/ECW (r = -0.47; p < 0.025). Patients with underhydration (n = 4; VCD <8 mm/m2) revealed limits for BIA variables as ICW/ECW (>1.50) and ECW/TBW (<0.40). The same held true for overhydration (n = 5; VCD >11.5 mm/m2): ICW/ECW (<1.50) and ECW/TBW (>0.40). Although the positive predictive value of ICW/ECW and ECW/TBW for both under- and overhydration was only 50% and 54%, respectively, there were no false negative values. Although BIA cannot replace VCD in PD patients, the reverse holds true as well. Combining BIA and VCD may lead to a better estimation of hydration status because both techniques provide complementary information.
在19例稳定的腹膜透析(PD)患者中,通过测量腔静脉直径(VCD)和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)变量:细胞内水(ICW)、细胞外水(ECW)和总体水(TBW)来评估水化状态。我们研究了BIA是否可以替代VCD。VCD与TBW不相关,但与ECW/TBW中度相关(r = 0.42;0.025 < p < 0.05)以及与ICW/ECW相关(r = -0.47;p < 0.025)。水化不足的患者(n = 4;VCD <8 mm/m2)显示出BIA变量的界限,如ICW/ECW(>1.50)和ECW/TBW(<0.40)。水化过度的患者(n = 5;VCD >11.5 mm/m2)情况相同:ICW/ECW(<1.50)和ECW/TBW(>0.40)。尽管ICW/ECW和ECW/TBW对水化不足和水化过度的阳性预测值分别仅为50%和54%,但不存在假阴性值。虽然在PD患者中BIA不能替代VCD,但反之亦然。结合BIA和VCD可能会更好地评估水化状态,因为这两种技术提供互补信息。