Matias Catarina N, Júdice Pedro B, Santos Diana A, Magalhães João P, Minderico Cláudia S, Fields David A, Sardinha Luís B, Silva Analiza M
a Exercise and Health Laboratory, CIPER, Fac Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa , Estrada da Costa , Cruz-Quebrada , PORTUGAL.
b Department of Pediatrics , Children's Medical Research Institute's Metabolic Research Program, University of Oklahoma Health, Science Center , Oklahoma City , Oklahoma.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2016 Jul;35(5):413-21. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2015.1058198. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
It is important for highly active individuals to easily and accurately assess their hydration level. Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) can potentially meet these needs but its validity in active individuals is not well established. We aim to validate total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), and intracellular water (ICW) estimates obtained from 50 kHz BIA, bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS), and BIA-based models against dilution techniques in 2 populations: active adults and elite athletes.
Active males (N = 28, 20-39 years) involved in recreational sports and elite athletes (females: N = 57, 16-35 years; males: N = 127, 16-38 years) participated in this study. TBW and ECW were assessed with deuterium and bromide dilution, respectively. ICW was assessed as their difference. Body water compartments were also assessed by BIA (BIA-101), BIS (model 4200), and BIA-based equations.
Small but significant differences were observed between alternative methods and the criterion in all subsamples. In female athletes, r(2) > 0.69, r(2) > 0.57, and r(2) > 0.65 were observed between methods in the TBW, ECW, and ICW estimates. In males, r(2) > 0.75, r(2) > 0.65, and r(2) > 0.68 were found between alternative and reference methods in the TBW, ECW, and ICW estimates, respectively, whereas for male recreational exercisers, r(2) > 0.58, r(2) > 0.73, and r(2) > 0.75 were observed. Pure errors ranged between 0.19 to 3.32 kg for TBW, 0.64 to 1.63 for ECW, and 1.98 to 2.64 in ICW. The highest limits of agreement (LoA) were observed in Van Loan and Mayclin equation and the BIA method, respectively, for TBW and ECW assessment and the lowest LoA were observed in BIS for both TBW and ECW estimates.
The higher accuracy of BIS in predicting individual TBW, ECW, and ICW highlights its utility in water assessment of recreational and elite athletes.
对于高活动量个体而言,轻松且准确地评估其水合状态非常重要。生物电阻抗(BIA)可能满足这些需求,但其在高活动量个体中的有效性尚未得到充分证实。我们旨在针对两种人群(活跃成年人和精英运动员),验证通过50kHz生物电阻抗分析(BIA)、生物电阻抗光谱法(BIS)以及基于BIA的模型获得的总体水(TBW)、细胞外水(ECW)和细胞内水(ICW)估计值与稀释技术的一致性。
参与休闲运动的活跃男性(N = 28,年龄20 - 39岁)以及精英运动员(女性:N = 57,年龄16 - 35岁;男性:N = 127,年龄16 - 38岁)参与了本研究。分别采用氘稀释法和溴化物稀释法评估TBW和ECW。ICW通过两者差值进行评估。还通过BIA(BIA - 101)、BIS(4200型)以及基于BIA的公式评估身体水分含量。
在所有子样本中,替代方法与标准方法之间均观察到虽小但显著的差异。在女运动员中,TBW、ECW和ICW估计值的方法间相关性系数(r²)分别> 0.69、> 0.57和> 0.65。在男性中,TBW、ECW和ICW估计值的替代方法与参考方法之间的r²分别> 0.75、> 0.65和> 0.68,而对于男性休闲锻炼者,观察到的r²分别> 0.58、> 0.73和> 0.75。TBW的纯误差范围在0.19至3.32kg之间,ECW为0.64至1.63,ICW为1.98至2.64。在TBW和ECW评估中,分别在Van Loan和Mayclin公式以及BIA方法中观察到最高的一致性界限(LoA),而在TBW和ECW估计值中,BIS的LoA最低。
BIS在预测个体TBW、ECW和ICW方面具有更高的准确性,突出了其在休闲和精英运动员水分评估中的实用性。