Depairon M, Tutta P, van Melle G, Hayoz D, Kappenberger L, Darioli R
Division d'hypertension et de médecine vasculaire, CHUV, Lausanne, Suisse.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2000 Jun;93(6):721-6.
Many studies have shown a close correlation between intima-medial thickness of the carotid artery measured by high resolution ultrasonography and the presence of coronary artery disease or atherogenic risk factors. However, reference values for the value of intima-medial thickness (IMT) in healthy subjects have not yet been established. The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine the reference values of carotid (C-IMT) and femoral intima-medial thickness (F-IMT) with respect to age and gender in healthy subjects (53 women and 45 men) aged 20 to 60, with no family or personal history of cardiovascular disease or atherogenic risk factors, underwent high resolution colour echo-Doppler examination. The mean C-IMT was 556 +/- 57 microns in women and 573 +/- 70 microns in men (NS), and the femoral equivalent was 543 +/- 63 microns in women and 562 +/- 74 microns in men (NS). Between the ages of 20 and 60, the C-IMT increased by 1.8 microns per year (p < 0.03) in women and 3.4 microns (p < 0.001) in men, the variations being respectively 1.2 microns (NS) and 3.1 microns (p < 0.002) in the femoral artery. Multiple regression analysis including gender and individual values of age, body mass index and lipid profile confirmed that only age was significantly correlated to the increase in thickness. The authors conclude that the reference values of IMT do not differ with gender or site of analysis, but there is a slight influence with respect to age.
许多研究表明,通过高分辨率超声测量的颈动脉内膜中层厚度与冠状动脉疾病或动脉粥样硬化危险因素之间存在密切相关性。然而,健康受试者内膜中层厚度(IMT)的参考值尚未确定。因此,本研究的目的是确定年龄在20至60岁、无心血管疾病家族史或个人史且无动脉粥样硬化危险因素的健康受试者(53名女性和45名男性)的颈动脉(C-IMT)和股动脉内膜中层厚度(F-IMT)的参考值,这些受试者接受了高分辨率彩色超声多普勒检查。女性的平均C-IMT为556±57微米,男性为573±70微米(无显著性差异),股动脉相应值女性为543±63微米,男性为562±74微米(无显著性差异)。在20至60岁之间,女性的C-IMT每年增加1.8微米(p<0.03),男性增加3.4微米(p<0.001),股动脉的变化分别为1.2微米(无显著性差异)和3.1微米(p<0.002)。包括性别以及年龄、体重指数和血脂谱个体值的多元回归分析证实,只有年龄与厚度增加显著相关。作者得出结论,IMT的参考值不因性别或分析部位而异,但年龄有轻微影响。