Colletti L M, Mulholland M W, Sonnad S S
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, 2921 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0331, USA.
Arch Surg. 2000 Aug;135(8):972-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.8.972.
We conducted this study to determine whether concerns expressed by male and female surgeons at 1 academic center are generally reflective of broader concerns for academic surgery and academic medicine. We reviewed published studies concerning women in academic surgery within the context of reporting the results of a survey of both male and female surgeons at 1 academic center.
We developed a survey that included demographic information, work experience, and social issues. The survey was distributed to the entire faculty. For key questions, we compared answers between male and female faculty. Additional data came from the published literature.
We reviewed all available studies identified by a MEDLINE search with key words women and academic and medicine or physician. Included studies contained either data collection or editorial comment concerning women in academic medicine.
Data and opinions from all included studies paralleling survey questions were extracted from each article.
Male and female faculty members reported different experiences and perceptions, specifically relating to relationships between family and professional life and perceptions of subtle sex-related biases. Both men and women reported insufficient mentoring and difficulties in balancing personal and professional responsibilities.
Attitudes, behaviors, and traditions surrounding how we structure work and evaluate participation in academic surgery are more difficult to change than just addressing obvious inequities in support for female surgeons. However, attempting the deeper changes is worthwhile, because addressing obstacles faced by female faculty, many of which also affect men, will allow progress toward environments that attract and retain the best physicians, regardless of sex.
我们开展这项研究,以确定一所学术中心的男性和女性外科医生所表达的担忧是否普遍反映了学术外科和学术医学领域更广泛的担忧。在报告对一所学术中心的男性和女性外科医生的调查结果时,我们回顾了已发表的有关学术外科领域女性的研究。
我们设计了一项涵盖人口统计学信息、工作经历和社会问题的调查。该调查分发给了全体教职员工。对于关键问题,我们比较了男性和女性教职员工的答案。其他数据来自已发表的文献。
我们回顾了通过MEDLINE检索以“女性”“学术”“医学”或“医生”为关键词所确定的所有可用研究。纳入的研究包含有关学术医学领域女性的数据收集或编辑评论。
从每篇文章中提取与调查问题平行的所有纳入研究中的数据和观点。
男性和女性教职员工报告了不同的经历和看法,特别是在家庭与职业生活的关系以及对细微性别相关偏见的看法方面。男性和女性都报告了指导不足以及在平衡个人和职业责任方面存在困难。
围绕我们如何构建工作以及评估学术外科参与度的态度、行为和传统,比仅仅解决对女性外科医生支持方面明显的不平等问题更难改变。然而,尝试进行更深入的变革是值得的,因为解决女性教职员工面临的障碍(其中许多障碍也影响男性)将有助于营造吸引和留住最优秀医生的环境,无论性别如何。